extra 14k for a turbo 1.5 spec, why not get the 1.8 n turbo it, instead of spend 14k on soft turbo, u can get a real turbo for 9k, the rest of the money spend on better brake pads
10th Gen Honda Civic
10th Gen Honda Civic
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 09:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
60 posts Joined: Dec 2013 |
extra 14k for a turbo 1.5 spec, why not get the 1.8 n turbo it, instead of spend 14k on soft turbo, u can get a real turbo for 9k, the rest of the money spend on better brake pads
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 10:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
60 posts Joined: Dec 2013 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 11:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
60 posts Joined: Dec 2013 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 12:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
60 posts Joined: Dec 2013 |
|
|
|
Sep 15 2017, 04:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
60 posts Joined: Dec 2013 |
QUOTE(berann @ Jun 15 2016, 11:35 PM) Looking at Honda 3M and Ecotint specs, is not worth 1500. Is lower range from 3M. With 1500-1600, you can actually get Raytech MX 5mil TESR 57% & IR 85% which is much better. sorry for digging out old post, but how much raytech qoute you for the MX series last year? thank youMy car always park under hot sun. So i plan for Raytech best tint 6 mil with IR 98% for front/back/side. Can get about 2.5-2.6k after discount. Really good after tested my boss car. Since will drive for 7 years min, Ill go for best tint and not to regret later for cheaper tint just to save some money. Decided to go for Raytech after comparing other top brands like Llumar/3M/Vkool/huper optik. I believe all these are equally good. Just my opinion, go for good tint for better comfort/cooling, better interior protection & better safety for the next few years. |
| Change to: | 0.0172sec
0.51
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 06:28 PM |