Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
wat camera should i buy...?, nid professional help me...
|
SUSsanook
|
Dec 19 2006, 02:12 PM
|
|
anti-shake is a farking scam, an advertising gimmick for increasing ISO and/or lowering the shutter speed and something similar. what you all should be looking for is OPTICAL IMAGE STABILISATION. anything else doesn't farking matter!
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSsanook
|
Dec 20 2006, 12:17 AM
|
|
@TZERNG, Most compact cameras don't have proper image stabilisation feature except for the PANASONIC FX series. You should buy your camera according to your needs, budget and priority. If you want a compact, portable cameras that can you carry easily around and take reasonably good pictures, you can't expect them to have all the advanced features that big, bulky DSLR cameras have. All compact cameras have their strengths and weaknesses and even the PANASONIC FX series, which has optical image stabilisation, are not immediately superior to compact cameras from CANON, SONY etc. One of the major weakness of the FX series is its relatively bad low-night shots and its tendency to produce grainy image when high ISO is used. so, your question of whether T-10 is good enough will depend on your individual expectation and preference. take a look at this review http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/T10/T10A.HTMit appeared that the T-10 has optical image stabilisation and the review is positive enough. check at www.pbase.com for some pictures taken by the camera and see if you like them and then check the prices and if it fits your budget, it looks like the camera may be what you are looking for. This post has been edited by sanook: Dec 20 2006, 12:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|