QUOTE(hightechgadgets8 @ Dec 30 2019, 08:40 PM)
Can help open the next thread? I don't have pc at the moment. Phone is abit hard lol Group Genting/Guerrilla Gamblers Club
Group Genting/Guerrilla Gamblers Club
|
|
Dec 30 2019, 08:45 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 31 2019, 12:14 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Jan 17 2020, 08:20 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
QUOTE(HunterBBQ @ Jan 15 2020, 07:53 PM) Hello im new here. There is already a simulator out thereI played most of the genting game. And now focus on the baccarat game. Did anyone find anyway to beat the game yet?. Want to ask have any do any kind of simulation test on the baccarat?. Currently i working on a simulation for baccarat and BJ project and testing out. Hope we may share more info about the simulation for the game and get better results. Cheer https://wizardofodds.com/play/baccarat/ You can't beat statistics but you can always hit and run. Imagine playing baccarat just on banker/player with no side bets. It's almost like a coin toss. |
|
|
Jan 17 2020, 08:21 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
QUOTE(HunterBBQ @ Jan 17 2020, 05:52 PM) without a doubt, the answer will be yes, but that not means player always lose. There is no formula, code or any of that nonsense statistics and odds don't lie.games are created to be beaten, its matter of time and who is that wiredo . using simulation we can test out many ways and patterns, its AI future, soon or later will crack any formula. the project i had now having very small EV+ positive, and looking to test out all the betting system to check which one standout better. i had shared my simulation results on others forums, and not sure its good idea to put it here, because there are long data-type. This blog i wrote 9 years ago 🤣 http://beatbaccarat.blogspot.com/2011/01/b...t-game.html?m=1 This post has been edited by ghoss: Jan 17 2020, 08:25 PM |
|
|
Jan 17 2020, 09:06 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
QUOTE(HunterBBQ @ Jan 17 2020, 08:58 PM) you are so right about it, gambler will never quit till they are broke. Can you tell me what is your rule of strategy for the simulation? So that can explain to you that, there is no such thing of a winning system. Cos every results there is another different results.we cant use that "play simulation" to test million or billion of hand, so i build 1 to test take about 5min to read your blog and there is basic rule of the game and some "look at the scoreboard" and find a pattern to play. if you are interested in my things, you may go to https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/ev-p...188/#post-89692 i cant say i had a won or big, but i got winner cheque is what i want to say, and so i also believe there is a way to keep a win on the game. but the way is not easy and it's more like working in the casino. i know this forum might have someone had better skills than me and i wish to ask for advice on how to improve the programming thing and speed up the testing process and so. if anyone know what its, please give me some advice, and currently i using python for my simulation. i know it will be slower than C, but python have the AI, later on, to support it if i need jump over to AI. By the way this site has already simulation https://wizardofodds.com/games/baccarat/basics/#simulations This post has been edited by ghoss: Jan 17 2020, 09:13 PM |
|
|
Jan 17 2020, 09:32 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
QUOTE(HunterBBQ @ Jan 17 2020, 09:17 PM) now the project still under testing and researching, in the testing we able to win 2 to 5hands in 1 shoe. No offence and not to throw cold water on you. the simulations you provide in wizardofodds.com is data, but cant use that to check 1by1. it may take lifetime to check all kind of testing if you have a simulation and let it do the work in less than 10sec per testing. But i can tell you, your system if it's positive. The sample size is too small to be significant. All the best to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 20 2020, 07:05 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
QUOTE(vamp1re @ Jan 19 2020, 11:25 AM) Proven that u r good , skillful and disciplined gambler since u got few hundred thousand winning cheque from Genting. Some people just need to learn it the hard way i guess.But disagree that there is a way to keep a win on game. No way to beat casino!! If there is a winning system, by now the casino would have changed their system. Even if you win, your sample size is too small compared to a big size of the data. |
|
|
Jan 21 2020, 03:35 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
Let me give you a simple example on why any systems don't work.
Let say we're using a simple martingale system with 4 players playing the same table. Each player will double up when the lose and stops after 1 win. Player A bets Banker Banker Player B bets Banker Player Player C bets Player Banker Player D bets Player Player Results is Banker followed by another Banker Player A won 0.95 unit Player B won 0.95 unit Player C won 0.90 unit Player D lost 3 units Casino profit 0.20 unit What are the odds for the players? Players have 75% chance of winning 1 unit with 25% chance of losing 3 units. No matter how you change the system, when you lose you big. |
|
|
Jan 21 2020, 03:42 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
Another example using same system but stops after losing 1 unit and will double up when won aka reverse martingale.
Player A bets Banker Banker Player B bets Banker Player Player C bets Player Banker Player D bets Player Player Results is Banker followed by another Banker Player A won 2.85 units Player B lost 1.05 units Player C lost 1 unit Player D lost 1 unit Casino still profit 0.20 Players have 25% of odds of winning 3 units with 75% chance of losing 1 unit. However you turn the system, the higher the chance of winning, the more you lose when you lost. |
|
|
Jan 21 2020, 07:08 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
My gosh.... This guy is disillusional if he can make a system for casino. For sports betting maybe yes. But n way for casino.
|
|
|
Feb 21 2020, 03:50 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2020, 03:52 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2020, 10:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Penang |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.1757sec
0.62
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 05:30 PM |