I currently own a 16-50mm F3.5-5.6

Plan to buy in another lens
for portrait and landscape

Both lens above I got the same offer price
-I tested 50-200 mm is quite good in background blur in portrait
-16mm F2.4 outcome much more sharper image(but I own a 16-50mm already)..

so can't decide to get which one.

Please advise which one is more better for daily use?

This post has been edited by teanbread: Jan 20 2016, 11:29 AM