Hi guys,just sharing testimoni.!!

my myvi 1.3 2009 pump this fuel ron 100. The engine is smoother and the fuel consumption decrease. i tested it just now when i go back to Melaka, i only use 15km/l and i was on full throttle all the way. If i use ron 95, my fuel consumption will be about 11km/l or so..

tq, just end of my  ron100 story.

all the japan import RX8, FD2R, EVO X/IX etc etc need RON100 to achieve the mentioned HP, no?

I mean compared if I pump 95 and go back melaka and ron100. The difference is 4km/l with the same driving style and conditions

Axia with ron 100, got add power or not.

Then pretty pointless to buy ron100. Unless those expansive car.
I seen myvi fill ron 100.

I believe cars are tuned to only one RON rating, not a range of them. You can use petrol with that RON or higher but not lower. Using a higher RON petrol has no benefit but won't harm the engine either. Using a lower RON risk engine knocking.

Not harder to burn.. it is more resistant to self ignition.. so that it does not prematurely detonate before the spark plugs ignites it. Once the spark plug fires and there is a source of ignition, the RON 100 will burn just like any other fuel.

I'm sceptical about the hydrocarbon part.... the amount of hydrocarbon in a given volume of petrol is fixed, how does regular cars product "more" hydrocarbons from burning the same volume of said petrol. 

He is coming from the point that they have to put more hydrocarbons in it to up the RON.. which is also why higher RON petrol does not produce the same amount of power as lower ron since there is 'more' hydrocarbons per part of fuel.

Dont spread misinformation to people when you don't know jack shit how things work. A RON number is not a measure of the fuels calorific or energy value. It is a standard the petroleum industry uses to quantify the anti-knocking properties of a fuel.

A RON90 fuel corresponds to a fuel with the same anti-knock ability as equivalent 90% vol of iso-octane (which is a component in gasoline usually added to raise the knock resistance).

Think of an explosion as a series of successive chain reaction. When you add long chain branched hydrocarbon (such as iso-octane), the chain reaction propogation is harder because long chain branched hydrocarbon are harder to break which essentially kill off your chain reaction (no chain reaction, no detonation).

Methanol, ethanol, MTBE are all anti-knock agents that the petroleum industry add to fuel. The energy or calorific value of fuel is an important fuel specification and the industry blends the fuel with additive and chemicals to get the required spec.

Pls don't  mind him bro..

He said in axia thread that pumping ron 100 will damage n is harmful  for the environment compared to ron 95

I challenged him n said ron 95 is euro 2 petrol while ron 97 n 100 is euro 4 petrol

How can it be more  harmful for the environment when there is less sulphur n gas  emission?

He didn't  even dare to respond after that

A lot of weirdos n "car experts " in lyn forum

Whatever nerd, u r probably  jealous of my ride(s)