Acer v nitro
Intel Core i5-6200U Dual-core 2.30 GHz
39.6 cm (15.6") Full HD (1920 x 1080) 16:9 IPS
NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 950M with 4 GB DDR3 VRAM
4 GB, DDR4 SDRAM
1 TB HDD
Rm 3k
Or

Dell inspiron 7559
Intel® Core™ i5-6300HQ Processor
- 2.3GHz, 6MB cache
- Display 15.6-inch FHD (1920 x 1080) Anti-Glare LED-Backlit Display
- NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 960M 4GB GDDR5
- 4GB Single Channel DDR3L 1600MHz (4GBx1)
- 1TB (5400rpm) HDD
rm 3.4k

This post has been edited by ASSKICKERr: Dec 28 2015, 07:35 PM

sure high spec better

Dell. Just add additional 4Gb Ram and it is good to go.

Dell much better for gaming because has gddr5 GPU

dell whd be better

This post has been edited by matkim: Dec 26 2015, 11:52 PM

if i would choose acer. Would it be any problems playing games at higj settings. It got ram 4gb ddr4 but i5 processor only 2cores. Haish. Really confuse.

Does it really diffence between ram ddr3 and ddr4?

i really love dell 7559 but only got around like rm3k

Yeah

Brother or sister, RAM has already pass the age where faster isnt gonna get you better gaming performances. DDR3 and DDR4 differs in clockrate which you are not going to see much difference when you game.

I see that you did your research which i will give kudos to you.

Using the Acer to play high settings will pretty much depends on what game. Older game sure, newer games maybe because 950M is an entry level card (for me) while 960M is entry level gaming card (if it makes sense. )

Bottomline is this

Better spec is Dell with one of the best after sale services and good cooling and best self maintenance laptop in the market.

This is my view the Acer i presume the newer model doesnt seem to be able to handle the heat very well because it is damn thin (it might throttle the speed thus negatively affect gaming experience) and its after sale services is bad compared to Dell.

If you have time, type in the model of the laptop and add in notebookcheck and see for yourself. Example dell 7559 notebookcheck and nitro notebookcheck to see.

oh dude... 960 > 950

acer and asus are banned due to poor tech support. if it works well then is fine.

what they say 960>950 in gaming so dell it is
as for cpu lots of ppl get mixed up with all those ending with U, HQ etc
if you wana see the CPU performance, those 2 are in different level..
refer here for U, find the proc model
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/mid_range_cpus.html
refer here for HQ, find the proc model and compare the 2 marks
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

the U is in Mid range, while HQ is in high range
the HQ score is almost 1.45 x better than the U so u go and decide

Note : if battery life is very important to you, U is the way to go tho, ultra low voltage but lower performance. those are the diff
as for esthetics, search in youtube for the models then you can see how good looking and feel they are..

Dell + 1
HTH
This post has been edited by Shoot@M3: Dec 27 2015, 02:39 AM

Nitro all the way bro
i would never ever buy a Dell

Ty Bro. Really helpful. So i need to work more to get del 7559. Haha

Y bro?give me reason

Thanks A lot bro. I can see the differences now haha

Wow. Ty bro

dells are made to spoil within 1 year

really? is that based on ur experience?

really? is that based on ur experience?

For play game sure have, if normal use not more different

seems like your are into a little bit of gaming because you are leaning towards the 950m and 960
well there alone is your answer because 950 is sort of an entry level gaming card

plus HP and Delll are designed to game as well as fry an egg on it
thats how hot they get during gaming

ive used the nitro. it does get a little hot aswell but mainly due to its ultrabook design and constraints

base on the spec u list, dell is way better in CPU, GPU, RAM...

Which ever model u choose, upgrade to SSD will suddenly make ur notebook 100% faster lol

be careful, some brand might void warranty... see Dell allows u to change HD in their configurator

Dell - partly because they have a service manual available for end users which can be used to repair machines without paying a lot to the manufacturer.

I just don't know why would people really want to go for manufacturer tech support - I'd rather had my laptop fixed by a third party (who knows laptops inside and out) rather than a manufacturer...

Agreed on that part, and to further reinforce the point Dell has been pretty nice with self repaired machines (there are even manuals supplied by them on how to service your machine).

As long as you don't try to mess up your laptop when servicing...

It's also worth mentioning that the Acer has a dual core, quad threaded chip (similar to desktop i3s), whereas the Dell has a quad core, quad threaded chip (similar to desktop i5s).

Not to mention that the 6200U in the Acer is a low voltage chip which trades off performance for longer battery life, unlike the Dell which has a standard, performance-oriented chip.

The CPU difference alone are already worth it.

People like me like to mess around so.......

Haha Wow. I think i would buy dell. But need to find for a DOS version. Cheaper

Yeah. U were right. Thanks bro

e.g. during warranty period.
and you bought 3 year extended warranty

If you know how to install windows or linus by yourself then it is fine if not best is to get with windows. Go to retail shops to find freedos. Happy hunting

Yeah. Third party cost lots of money

haha Okay. i'll try. Hope next year price will decrease. Haha

I prefer to buy dell because service is good. Specification which you have chosen is middle range with decent gaming and decent overall performance.

Yeah. Lots of people recommend dell more than acer. Ty all

always choose Dell no matter what if you want good after sale service

Agree with Dell, I got myself a 7559 too. That extra RM400 on better non-upgradable CPU and GPU is very much worth the money.

U got Any problem with 7559? I did some research that 7559 produce quite loud noise

I don't have other laptop to compare with, but my desktop 980Ti sounded pounder...

what is your priority, battery life or performance?