Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 [WTA] Kia Forte 1.6 SX, Year 2012

views
     
TSQoMPLoT
post Dec 21 2015, 11:11 PM, updated 10y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
Hi guys,

I am planning to buy 2nd hand car. I saw forte 1.6 sx, condition quite good. But the thing is i am not sure about the parts, as kia is not producing forte anymore. So should i pursue buying forte? Or choose another? Thanks in advance
TSQoMPLoT
post Dec 22 2015, 08:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
QUOTE(squalluz @ Dec 22 2015, 03:01 PM)
Parts are aplenty here, shouldn't be a problem
*
Oh really? Are u forte user?
Appreciate ur feedback on this car.. 😀
TSQoMPLoT
post Dec 23 2015, 04:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
QUOTE(squalluz @ Dec 22 2015, 08:55 PM)
Yup, I was among the first buyers, which is the 4-speed version. 2012 version should be 6-speed, better fuel efficiency. I have no complain at all with the car for these past 6 years of ownership, clocking almost 120,000 km already
*
Wow glad to hear that, now i am more confident to get one. Thanks. But do u mind share a pic of ur forte pls?
TSQoMPLoT
post Jan 9 2016, 06:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
QUOTE(taylorskaki @ Jan 9 2016, 01:37 AM)
Mine 6 speed 2011 car.
Clocking 105k.
No complaint at all. Very recommended.
Just normal wear and tear like battery and tires which every car face.get the 2.0 ones its more powerful.
*
Good to hear that : )
2.0 should be more powerful but I'm considering the fuel efficiency as well. So maybe just 1.6 for me huhu
TSQoMPLoT
post Jan 10 2016, 07:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
QUOTE(cahayamalamku @ Jan 10 2016, 08:45 AM)
1.6 is fine but i suggest you to have test drive it first. going for 70k km service soon in February and so far so good 😊
*
QUOTE(taylorskaki @ Jan 10 2016, 12:02 PM)
Fuel is not very efficient for the 1.6 cos of the 17" rims.
I think 2.0 will be more fuel efficient on highway. In city I think almost the same.
*
QUOTE(kailord @ Jan 10 2016, 07:02 PM)
Go for 2.0 if it's within your budget. Maintenance cost doesn't differ much. Fuel efficiency is not so decent in jam-infested city driving for both variants.

You'll appreciate the extra power in the long run.
*
Hmm now thinking to get 2.0 pulak.. about the maintenance also should be similar right? But seriously FC for both 1.6 n 2.0 similar for city drive?
TSQoMPLoT
post Jan 11 2016, 11:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
QUOTE(k!nex @ Jan 10 2016, 08:40 PM)
If you can afford the 2.0, don't get the 1.6L ones. 1.6L for such a big body is underpowered. You will need to press the accelerator more to move the car. So in the end, fuel efficiency will not be much of a difference than a 2.0L which can press less on the accelerator.

The only question now is whether are you willing to fork out ~RM380 for a 2.0L car roadtax compare to a RM90 1.6L
*
Yeaahh.. u got a point there. Thanks
TSQoMPLoT
post Jan 14 2016, 04:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
266 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
QUOTE(kord @ Jan 14 2016, 03:40 PM)
Hi tS.. i own a 1.6 sx year 2012., the 6 speed version..mileage now @80+km
1st thing, some ppl mentioned that it is underpower?.. im sure ull not going to use it for weekend track days, otherwise, if ure using for normal commute/highway cruising then shud be no problem.. power is there.. if u want a powerful racing car than---- evo, gtr, lfa, wiralution etc is THAT WAY--->.. hahah JK JK..

trust me.. learn to use the pedal shift then u know how to harness the power u need from this car.  for me, i found the power is suffice enuff for normal driving or even in highways. i normally cruise around 140kmh, but if u really need to go fast, then 200kmh+ is achieveable using this "underpowered" engine. I tried that..but only for a short while, not even pedal to the metal yet, just to make point as this car is not built for racing purpose.

Performance aside, FC is good, highways im able to achieve around 5.6L/100km @ 110kmh, mix drive, around 8-10ish. compare with 2.0, i dont know, never try, never had it..but like others are saying, 2.0 wud be better in FC dept i think..i think..

So far i just changed the battery which cost around RM260 (din55 iinm.) The rest, just follow the scheduled maintenance by SC, tho i found the cost is still quite high. Normal change of engine oil (FS 5w30 petronas) is around RM300. I just changed the brake pads for ~RM500 incl w/manship. other services wud range from RM300 up to RM900. So, be prepared for that amount of cash.

Only problem with this car is, the steering tends to steer to the left, which i found it annoying, its like having a real bad alignment, altho i have numerous times sent it to SC, tyre shops to get it align..the problem is still there even until now. Other problems, none so far. Engine, gbox all still good.

For 2012 1.6SX, be sure to get the unit with full infotainment 7inch dvd, gps unit and DRL if u can, as that is the final batch of those cars which naza shoved all sorts of goodies they can find to attract buyers to clean those stocks.. Good luck.
*
Hi there, thank you for sharing. If I'm buying used forte, what are the things that i need to check? Maybe u guys have some tips?


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0143sec    1.40    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 01:20 PM