QUOTE(yinchet @ Dec 21 2015, 12:38 PM)
But but those MIG21...ooopss... J17 cheap cheap wor
Military Thread V19
Military Thread V19
|
|
Dec 21 2015, 12:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
|
|
|
Dec 21 2015, 01:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
|
|
|
Dec 21 2015, 02:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
|
|
|
Dec 21 2015, 02:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Dec 21 2015, 02:49 PM) JF17 is oversea Pakistan AF project, is fund by Pakistan Gov, so not related to China airforce. sure china PLAAF not ordr it. plus FC17 never design to meet spec PLAAF requirement in mind. same to J-31/FC31, also not funding by PLAAF. just purely AVIC own project. QUOTE In June 1999, the contract to jointly develop and produce the Chengdu FC-1/Super 7 was signed. The project was to be a 50:50 partnership; the air forces of both countries would be committed to ordering the fighter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAC/PAC_JF-17_Thunder |
|
|
Dec 21 2015, 03:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Dec 21 2015, 03:03 PM) well oversea people just read wiki is not correct what china term. Those military talk (kok) show on TV in Taipei also say the same.... that its JV between the 2 gomen and paki tak syiok PLAAF not buying.is just chengdu aircraft sign with Pakistan,not even PLAAF present. chengdu it self invest 50%, not related to China Gov or PLAAF reality is every familiar with china military will know. |
|
|
Dec 23 2015, 03:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
|
|
|
Dec 23 2015, 05:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Dec 23 2015, 03:35 PM) as many people said, if get second hand than you not get new 1 anymore. so better not get old one. also old more more cost to maintenance. On the other hand, there's the risk we won't see any replacement and a dwindling force in the future. Ie the pinoys after Marcos.also we more prefer twin engine aricraft |
|
|
Feb 5 2016, 02:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
|
|
|
Feb 17 2016, 06:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Feb 17 2016, 06:04 PM) but with SK tech and their equally large mobile infantry, surely hard to penetrate even tho only 30+ miles right Not fast enough to prevent Seoul turning into a barbecue.nukes and artie should be easy for SK to neutralized given the fact that NK af wouldnt stand chance when SK sent in the birds, unless the ruskie have been giving away their S400! haha |
|
|
Feb 23 2016, 04:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
QUOTE The Chinese Hunting Eagle military Gyrocopter from the Defence Company Shaanxi Baoji Special Vehicles. A gyrocopter is a type of rotorcraft which uses an unpowered rotor in autorotation to develop lift, and an engine-powered propeller, similar to that of a fixed-wing aircraft, to provide thrust. The Hunting Eagle is also used by Government agencies in the world for traffic observation duties, search and rescue coordination. The gyrocopter Hunting Eagle can also to be used for military and security application as border control, anti-riot, aerial reconnaissance missions and Special Forces Operations for deploying soldiers behind enemy line. http://defence-blog.com/news/photos-of-chi...gyrocopter.html ![]() ![]() |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0653sec
0.63
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 09:45 AM |