Nice
Military Thread V19
Military Thread V19
|
|
Dec 10 2015, 12:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
Nice
|
|
|
Dec 10 2015, 02:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(edwardstevens @ Dec 10 2015, 12:19 PM) sini ada jual ke military surplus macam makanan ke, kenderaan ke? food? none i heard ofmacam uk: http://www.mod-sales.com tenkiu vehicles? some yards in batu caves do have ex-army vehicles in stock, most common you can find is land rover, g-wagon, pinzgauer, some also have used dirt bikes |
|
|
Dec 10 2015, 04:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Dec 10 2015, 10:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(TheHitman47 @ Dec 10 2015, 06:34 PM) is this the first in our inventory?. the ec725 and aw109 operated by the air force and army also have a ball turret flir, but alas theyre not a tailored attack helii mean like for heli, since this would be very helpful especially at the times when the sulu attack for example. it would be much help to locate their location right?. |
|
|
Dec 10 2015, 10:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE Siege at Kandahar airport is finished – at least 50 dead Afghan government officials say the fighting at Kandahar airport is over. There are at least 50 dead, although some news outlets are reporting 70 have been killed. Another 37 were wounded in the Taliban attack. Taliban gunmen attacked the airport and a residential compound Tuesday night taking hostages. The fighting ended late Wednesday when the last of the 11 Taliban were killed, according to the Afghan government. Afghan special forces led the counter-attack. The Taliban described its fighters as “martyrdom seekers” and said they men had launched “thunderous attacks on foreign and hireling personnel.” In Brussels, a NATO spokesman for the mission in Afghanistan said there were no coalition casualties in the Kandahar attack. U.S. Army Col. Michael Lawhorn said the Taliban “never physically entered the airfield” in Kandahar, but fired toward the military air base from positions inside a nearby school. The Kandahar airport is beside the airbase. (with files from the Associated Press) http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/def...t-least-50-dead |
|
|
Dec 11 2015, 01:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(thpace @ Dec 10 2015, 10:58 PM) If want cakap.. armed those ec725 with mini guns also can consider attack heli. if want even the aw109 have option to make it full-fledged attack heli, heck they even extensively promote it to us, but bait not taken it seemsAttack heli by right like how the russian and American is for primary anti tanks roles But well at least ada something better than nothing ![]() |
|
|
Dec 16 2015, 08:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Dec 15 2015, 11:40 PM) follow maritime law, water territory is 12nm (22km) from land, but 200km from land is exclusive economic zone (EEZ) 。 if this is really jerlun, then its approximately 120km off the coast of bintulu and close to their usual anchoring site at luconiawell china patrol ship is park outside Luconia reef about 80km to miri/bintulu, because Luconia reef is most south reef claim by china in south china sea (China 9 dash line), and china use china media to publicize they already own Luconia reef and there patrol ship park there to prove they claim and monitor any activity in Luconia reef. if any malaysian military personal on Luconia reef, there media will hu-ha malaysia invade China reef, this using media tactic. Vietnam/Philipione also start doing re-claimation land in South china sea reef/island before china come to take. for now is malaysian Gov is enough brave to make Reclaimation land and setup outpost in Luconia reef to official claim our territory? is risk between economic/politic/military issue with china. so as long china don't go to Luconia reef. so to malaysia, both is happy for now. but eventually at the end China will take Luconia reef too .... we are nothing to fight with china in Economic and military。 we should do Reclaimation land now before too late. to date the whole scene is dull fanfare with both sides staring at each other, usually i can see navy and mmea ship takes turn to watch them although they do have radio warning blaring at us when we passes by to get to our sk408 oil block, but thats it msian fishermen can always land at the luconia shoal with no problem if you just forget about the radio warning they are like those crazy neighbour who always shouts at you, and provoke you to retaliate, cuz thats exactly what they wanted in luconia shoal we have a big sovereign stone planted there ady |
|
|
Dec 16 2015, 07:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(Zaryl @ Dec 16 2015, 06:32 PM) why the drone just carry only 4 missiles? why not 32 or 64, like in Ace combat games or other flight sims arcade games? drones are made to endure long flying hours at high altitude, so they are made light with lengthy wings to reach those altitudeLater habis need to go back base & re arm & refuel pulak haiyaa and they have a little but efficient and silent engine, but in turn they cant carry much of anything else thats the trade-off of using drones, they are great for recon & precision strike mission, but they are not a bomber carrying many missiles |
|
|
Dec 18 2015, 06:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Dec 23 2015, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Dec 23 2015, 02:06 PM) Philippines to Spend Big on Massive Military Modernization 56.79 billion pesos = 1.2 billion usd![]() http://sputniknews.com/asia/20151223/10321...ernization.html thats not really much even on asean military standard, but i guess its a lot for them |
|
|
Dec 23 2015, 02:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Dec 23 2015, 02:16 PM) seem better than our, we only have budget around usd 800m (0.8b) for procurement weapon in Military Modernization, thats our yearly budget, the phil 1.2-1.7bil is for 5-year plan like our rmk plan, imagine our military rmk plan is only 1bil.. remaining budget is for management budget like wages, maintanance hardware, fuel, ammunition QUOTE Aquino, ineligible to run for re-election under the constitution, promised to spend about 83.90 billion pesos ($1.77 billion) in a five-year period until 2017 to strengthen the military as China asserts its claims to most of the waters. http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-southchin...N0U40QO20151221 |
|
|
Dec 26 2015, 06:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
found it, its a tiran apc or apc-55
![]() |
|
|
Dec 28 2015, 04:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Dec 28 2015, 04:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Dec 29 2015, 06:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Dec 29 2015, 07:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Dec 29 2015, 11:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2015, 08:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2015, 06:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(enviro @ Dec 31 2015, 06:40 AM) it is equipped with K-37-800M shock-absorbing ejector seatsQUOTE For improved pilot survivability the Ka-50 is fitted with a NPP Zvezda (transl. Star) K-37-800 ejection seat, which is a rare feature for a helicopter. Before the rocket in the ejection seat deploys, the rotor blades are blown away by explosive charges in the rotor disc and the canopy is jettisoned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamov_Ka-50 |
|
|
Jan 1 2016, 07:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0630sec
0.57
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 04:34 PM |