im taking p1, p2, p3 this coming sitting. i ve taken haneef class half way in jan, resulting deferment of fees at segi currently.... i dunno wat to do with it since im not interested in any lecturer there... any1 here would like to take up the deferred fees? rm432..... price is negotiable... my email lemontea1014@yahoo.com

its real? my mum told me, but i said she might have read wrongly.... how come? really unfair

does any1 know about the 3 lecturers teaching p1 p2 p3 at segi? any comment?

hey, congrates.. very good result... any tips on studying 2.6.. how u answer?... may i know where u study for 2.6? 1st attempt? sorry if ask too many questions.. but really interested about it...
i took only 2.6 last sitting n still fail, feel so so so useless, 3rd attempt d... a sitting b4 i blank so much, get 48, this sitting i write confidently, but 47..... dunno where gone wrong... really really wish this dec will be my final exam...

Thanks for ur golden advice guys......

- 15mins used to scan thru the case study n choose which question to be eliminated
- 4-5 profesional marks are given to logical flow of answer in section A, not on english, handwriting or grammar
- Question will not only focus on CG alone, but as well as IC + Risk + ethics
- When writing answer, we r not required to quote which code, examiner says only general knowledge of those codes is sufficient. The 3 most important code are Combined Code + ICGN + OECD
- Students are encouraged to choose a large company, Asian co is recommended, and read on the Annual Report, regarding CG through the website
- Write ur answer that can make the examiner understand
- Prof Ethics on9 module is free and can be done at time that u feel convenient
- Read on the article in Jan2007 by Gareth Owen, with title "testing testing 123"...
- to write a good answer, use knowledge + application + value recommendation to construct argument
- Mr Johnson also briefly discussed about CG and OECD principles and pilot paper question
- Pilot Qs1 (a), 10 marks expected to be broken down to 5 points with detailed explanation rather than 10 points with brief explanation as this is level 3 question.
- write sentences + para, no note form
- Qs1 (b) the key word - "and" , explain how risk can be assessed do NOT mean that u explain EACH risks u have identified...
- Qs1 (C) again key word - "and"; advantages of unitary board no need to link to case; after "and", explain reasons why unitary board + link to case...... put the most convincing case 1st
- Qs4 (a) key word - "for example" , NOT must use Turnbull guidance, u could use or not to use
- How to review scenario ?
1. who is principal?
2. who is agents?
3. relationship of them?
4. mitigate risk.

Most of them were discussed by lecturer in the class

This post has been edited by lemontea1014: Sep 13 2007, 11:15 PM

that's wat he said, n that is wat i jot down. hope got nth wrong....his slang too UK, sometime a bit slow to get his msg when he is talking... the seminar ended at 9pm... where do u take p1?