Anybody using this tyre? Currently using it for my honda jazz...195 50R 16.....cant review much since using it for less than 400km at the moment....

The tyre quite good in wet and dry performance compare with continental cpc2 and dunlop sp sport j5 and good year duraplus using with my old hyundai getz....

Sharp cornering.....value for money tyres....but a little bit noisy....as.noisy as the standard tyres provide by Honda Malaysia.....

With the price, i dont think any tyres manufacturer in Malaysia can beat it except some unknown China brand imported tyres....

Already using this tyres for more than 2300 km....good cornering and wet traction....but a little bit noisy....

No thread pattern view? Sincera seem entry budget category, so noisy is expected

Picture from internet....


Attached thumbnail(s)

From the picture of tyre thread immediately can identify why its noisy.. It doesn't have small2 line to absorb vibration.. The 3 line in the middle is for disperse water on wet road, and its symmetrical tyre not rotation tyre so can't swap left to right..

thats the main reason why i choose sp sport j5 in the end, some how I get cheaper price

My ex-car Hyundai Getz is using sp sport J5....not so good at cornering and wet performance.....this sincera is better in that department...however its noisy than j5....however since the new jazz is used by my son and he dont bother the noisy tyres....then decide on this tyres...

Are the J5 that u use is 195 50 R 16 as well? If yes, how much tjhat you get?

mine is 175/70R/13, frankly speaking, I dont choose Falken 832 is because it give me bad impression on 828, I nearly accident due to 828 during raining, Lucky that I am driving a manual saga blm, so still manage to handle back even is start to drift at Jalan Duta

Means puddle too deep that it aquaplane, tendency higher for smaller vehicles.

If the puddle too deep, any tyre would be aquaplaning , but the tendency is higher with tyre of higher width rather than small width.....

Oh interesting. How so that with differing wideness (not side profile width), the tendency greater as it goes wider? Do explain. I thought once once water evacuating channel is overwhelmed, aquaplaning is a given already. Marvin's case was because possibly one side lost traction. But also depends on tyre suitability for rainy conditions too and if there's oil on the road esp when initial downpour after a hot sunny day which somehow contributes to higher incidences of traction loss.

I am not expert on this, but through my reading and experience small / skinny width tyres such as 155 will be easily cutting through the puddle easier than 255 width of tyres....the result is that skinny tyres is less prone to aquaplaning compared to wider tyres.....pls google on this .....

Already used it with mileage of 6200 km.....quite good for wet traction as well....dry grip also good....but a litle bit noisy.....but for its price...its value for money....

this tyre having threadwear of 500.

walaoehhhhhh

sure very hard compound and low rolling resistence

Low rolling resistance is yes since its eco tyre....design for better mileage....quite hard but not very hard.....

This post has been edited by mym123: Apr 5 2016, 04:37 PM

I think the fact of Getz is really an unstable car during medium and high speed, is the reason for "slightly buang" feeling driving rather than the tyre la. Hehe

Before using sp sport J5, the getz is using good year duraplus and dont feel 'buang' at all during cornering and wet drivng.... I think getz suspension if not better, its is equal to current jazz model....its feel stable during high speed above 160km/h....

Have bought 2 pcs Falken Sincera SN832 before (it's for my brother car).
Though I never drive the car & no commend on it's performance, but I don't like this tyre. Main reason is it's side wall very thin, too thin that when you use your finger to poke the side wall from the inner side, you may feel your finger tip on the other side.
I seriously doubt if you accidentally rub the tyre side wall with any hard object during parking, it'll burst.
The only good point of it is it's very cheap.

yup ..
for wider (eg 205) tyre, the water need to travel more distance compare (eg 155)..

I dont understand ur point....thin side wall is based on aspect ratio of your tyre....e.g tyre of 215 45 17 will have thinner side wall as compared to 215 60 17....its got nothing to do with type of tyres....after all this tyre is silica based as like most tyres....however this tyre really dirt cheap....anybody can get lower than RM175 per piece for 195 50R 16 ? I doubt it except for unknown China brand....

I'm referring to the tyre material, not sizes. The side wall of this tyre is very thin, if you at tyre shop, try to touch this tyre and you'll know what I mean.

I'm referring to the tyre material, not sizes. The side wall of this tyre is very thin, if you at tyre shop, try to touch this tyre and you'll know what I mean.

Most of the tyres material now is natural.rubber with the mix of highly dispersible silicas whereby the silicas will bond with the rubber matrix to enhance the reinforcement of the tyres as most current tyres manufacturer do now
..this Falken tyres using this technology as well...this bonded rubber and silica is much stronger than the natural rubber matrix itself and have greater pliability and thus have the bending or flexibility than ordinary rubber....so the strength of the tyres depend on the thickness of the tyres is already a past equation.....technology do wonders now.....

This post has been edited by mym123: Apr 6 2016, 10:24 PM

any update from this tyre user? planning to change to this tyre this week..
got offer for 205/55/r16 RM 210/pcs (before GST and before trade in) at kuantan..
they want to trade in with my old michelin XM2 (end 2012) for RM300-4pcs..
my XM2 thread is still about 50% but i'm not confident to use it since already 4 years from date of manufacture..

This post has been edited by ashralph7: Nov 9 2016, 09:23 AM

just change to this tyre from ze912.. got a very good deals.. for december 2016 made tyre.. only 120 per piece.. 195.55.15...

Is this better than 912?

i think not better compared to 912.. i use 912 for 4 years.. cornering very sharp. This tyre i try at 140 kinda wobbly..

this is budget tyres....dont expect too much on the tyres...however quite good on wet condition....already using at abt 21,000 km....still have half thread....maybe good for another 20,000 km...value for money as its cheapest at RM170 per pieces for 195 50R 16....

This post has been edited by mym123: Apr 29 2017, 04:17 PM

than something wrong with your tyres.

Thread wear of 520 (if not mistaken) should last for 56-60k km. If only for 40000 km the threadwear should be around 320. But its all down to your driving style also.

i normally used up to 70% of the thread or 5 years whichever come first....so if i used it up to 40,000km which is translate into 70% of the thread, the tyre can possibly go up to 40,000 km / 70 x 100 = 57,000 km.... however i dont believe in manufacturer rating on the thread-wear.... i remember the gimmick of GoodYear Duraplus of 100k km mileage...after 70k , there was practically no grip at all....i believe more on my instinct rather than marketing gimmick...

Falken cheap series really drift king in wet road

Do this tyres come in 235/45R17 size ?

falken 914 available.i have seen this size before.

Hi, I'm planning to change my tire to falken 832. any review on it? my car is a Vios 2005. I will leave Malaysia after 1 year hopefully. So, was looking for something cheao but fuel economic and good gripping. One of my friend is selling his car, I planed to swipe my tire with his. agreed four tyres for 350rm. he drove his car around 50Km after buying the tyre so its almost brand new. Any suggestion? or should I buy other brand tyre?

Installed 4 pcs of 185/60/15 Falken 832 at rm120 each including gst, balancing, valve, and alignment. Free alignment every 10k km.

Overall good wet braking, decent wet and dry grip, plus comfort tire. Low noice at low speed. Noisy tire above 60km/h though.

Pls share location. TQ.

Stamford tires in Glenmarie U1.

Already using it at 33k.....maybe good for another 10k...

Really as good as CPC2?

already ditched the tyres since last May....good for about 55k km....overall good value for money if you dont mind the noise....but good during wet season...

I choose back cpc2

Im spirtied driver but not those fella make suddent brake while cornering(newbie only do that and they complain the tires have bad grip). Previous tires I used were Michelin Certis to Goodyear Duraplus to Falken SN832i. 28psi is car original air pressure but I prefer 33psi,tires size is 185/70R14 and Im more on balance grip between dry and wet.
Falken is 3.5years old now and it is still very balance tire between dry and wet, handling and response is above average than all of my 14inch tires. I have no comment on noise because my car is more noisy than my tires noise.
Michelin was comfortable but abit sluggish on slalom turn. Duraplus was quite ok during dry but wet traction decrease quite alot when passed its 3years old even though still left 50% of tread on it.
3 different kind of tires mentioned above were not tested for aquaplaning because I avoid standing water as much as I can. Hope this help.