This residensi seri wahyu must be oversubscribed already now.

Heard my friend said dev comes out their "own rules" to urge for loan done and required to pay 10% to be qualify for ballot day, without securing the unit and knowing the unit/level/facing at all. Wonder how buyer's interests is protected in this case. Lol

Hmm.. Wonder where and how this rules is approved or monitored (if there is pointer)?

In fact, vendor cannot collect DP till SNP is signed. It's only legitimate to accept booking fees and refundable with agreed % in penalty.

HAHA 。

Pay first, there's a need to cancel and ask for refund if you doesn't like the balloted unit.

Pay later, there's no need to cancel and ask for refund if you doesn't like the balloted unit.

And dev didn't state in black in white there will be 100% refund, unless it's rejected by dbkl.

No wonder.. you're agent..

Why don't make it transparent here..

Hehe.. then post something reliable and consistent la..

No worry bro.

Two questions:

1) The leasehold land remains to expire on 2102, and left 85years only?

2) How does the incinerator affects this area?

Thanks

I heard the same whereby they gonna renew it to be 94 years, but not so sure for Lakeville though both resides on same parcel/plot.

Finally, I decided to drop my buying decision for this project.

There is already confirmed plan to build new incinerator within 2km. Just beside the Taman Metropiltan (aka Layang-Layang Park) or beside the petrol kios.

if draw strait line actually only 600m radius from PPA1M and about 2km from Lakeville, yes if you drive out Jalan ipoh turn up mrr2 is about 4km
but pollution go strait line.

even the incinerator success oppose and drop like Bukit payong incinerator that place also not a nice place to stay
the waste transfer station is terrible managed by alam flora




This post has been edited by honesty tan: Mar 21 2017, 11:40 AM

Bro,

We are talking on the incinerator, whereby the pollution is usually air borne (besides the waste).

Plus, there is no assurance of continuous efforts to sustain the lake and even it is, the factor from burning furnace is already killing.

It is an issue actually, just that whether you can accept it or not.

Yes you are right there is one at metropolitan lake, and another one per screenshot shared above (which is located at north west from eco sky) and becomes our interests for lakeville project. Those are new and work in progress/proposals to finalise its deployments.

Alternatively, you may google up or go to this facebook page for more insights.
They have 2k followers to join the topics.



This post has been edited by honesty tan: Mar 21 2017, 11:19 PM

It's sensitive to discuss further (in tender stage) I think the info is suffice for us to analyze and hedge our interests than knowing minimal and in the dark. All the best bro.

No problem bro, in today's digitization - those things ought to be transparent as we are end retailers / purchasers who eventually make commit into loan facility and paying for long term.

I did walked in to the sales gallery yesterday to double confirm on this, and guess what, their staffs only admit to me now. But shifting the topic a lil that Eco Sky gets more impact than us.

The fact is, in overseas, the guidance for heights of the furnace / incinerator needs to be higher than residential of surroundings, or at least certain radius of displacement. But what we foresee with the condo / apartment block heights of 30-40 floors, the pollution factor will be there as the dispersion of smoke is going up.

Also to note, for now all cars / traffics need to go to Batu Caves roundabout in making U-turn to KL, every morning. Let's just count the volume of 1900 unit from Lakeville plus 660 unit from Residensi Seri Wahyu alone.

For investment, any high density like this will suffer to get tenants / resell quickly as there are just plenty of choices.

Yes that one I know. But it's just mitigation plan as the effective one should link directly towards jalan kuching itself.

The point is with the capacity of 2500 units, the traffic is already created no matter how's the diversion. Just study on the # of people per acre. Developer would have that prelim data before submitting to KPKT for land clearance.

You were not wrong, it is a relief hence I said is mitigation. I didn't said all cars coming out at the same time, but it served a reference for benchmark to other residentials / areas if just 30% of it coming out at the same time. The prediction should be straight forward.

IMO, developer already tried to accommodate some key concerns - e.g. link road, water cleaning etc. but it's not for free hence the price point is trending high at that leased land since 2013/14. And incinerators issue and external traffics is something they can't really control since acquisition of land is already done, they just want to squeeze the profits to maximum and pay for your salary too.

Nobody's opt-in no traffic or heavy jam - but moderate traffic is something ppl prefer and will benefits all. Again this tied back to what / how many had been approved / built on the same piece of land. I think no one will agree with 1909+660 units is considered medium or low density. Plse note current traffic / landscape is already congested enough.

Juz my 2cents worth.

This post has been edited by honesty tan: Mar 22 2017, 01:42 PM

Yes the main reason I drop the booking also bcoz of incinerators. Jam is already a known issue even now.

Does the 0.33 cents psf covers or partially contributes to the maintenance of lake?

As I run JMB / RA before, with the provision of shutter bus to mrt station, is actually part of residents money, unless there is arrangement done with the authority.

Can @meraboy confirms who funds that?

Meanwhile, rumahwip maintenance fees is around 0.25 psf.

Both sitting on commercial lands, luckily developer absorbs the GST. But again absorbs implicates it is part of the SPA price.

I'm not the lead for incinerators but I was informed by those NGO people, I'm purely buyer and only interested whether this is good buy for my kids stay.

Anyway, It's not really secretive for now as it is sort of approved. Just pending to start works and in tender stage. 3 companies is awaiting the final awards.

That's the reason developer and agents didn't deny it as they know they can't deny it.

This post has been edited by honesty tan: Mar 22 2017, 01:55 PM

Buying properties is a forward-looking exercise, nobody's going to know whether it's a good buy or bad buy.

The pre-requisite is - basic research is important so that we understand the associated risks. I don't trust if everything is just good or perfect.

And different people perceived different acceptance / tolerance to risks, thus risk management is a skill we need to acquire.