I think UOA always sell more expensive than others.
But since the rental are same, buying from UOA command low rental yield.
Not sure about long term appreciation though, probably free hold is better.

Huh?? Y u think I m an agent? Or u are an agent? Maybe u guys always like to attack among each other so that u will think I am the one.

By the way, I am just a person who just went to the showroom as I mentioned. I would like to purchase my 1st hs and I have no knowledge & experience on property, so can anyone give some advice to me what issue should I looking for this project or the other new project?

Normally I go to the website call "propsocial" to get some info. There have lots of info, including the facilities and fee those that. But I am nt sure whether their info accurate or not. I saw the other properties have lots of facilities, around 0.30psf. If nt mistaken, inspirasi is 0.40psf but look like the facilities not that much, or actually they still have the other facilities but haven launched yet so that they haven list out all of it?

Actually have what difference between freehold and leasehold? The agent told me nth important because leasehold is 99 yrs, is very long time after, no need to worry, some more he said after 99 yrs still can renew one.

In reality, no difference. Period

In fact, as askarperang example above has shown, fh buyers lose out on rental yields compared with lh buyers.

It's a psychosis leftover from our Cina grandfather's time. Seriously, get over it. It's losing u money!

The last time I checked with the SA, the maintenance is 0.30 psf

if you talk to an agent that sell FH property, would he say 'no point of buying FH popety. LH is better'.

I can only say that LH popety is better if there is NO FH popety in the area.

Monoland and MKH same same.

they will launch the cheapest in an area with inferior finishing. Investors don't care as they see there is opportunity to make money as their cost is lower than others.
tenants don't care as they are paying lower rent and still get 4 walls. Win win situation.

the name still maintain as saville...or has it chg to inspirasi?
mkh workmanship hasnt been that good....look at saville range of quality to decide...

Titiwangsa Saville also like

Anyone sign LO from bank for this IMK project?

Heard from agent the master model arrived in their show room in OKR.

I went to the showroom last Monday. The master model and each unit layout has arrived and there are 2 exit for this project, JK3 and JK4.

Do they have the dbkl approval on the extension works in jk4?

But which one is the main one.

can anyone share the model.

Not sure, didn't ask the SA there

The main is JK4 according to them, dunno how true

Should ask them to provide proof on jk4 road extension. Otherwise owners sign spa with verbal promise and in the end it doesn’t materialise full of disappointment.

.. Our Group has to pay property development charges of RM15.40 million to
Kuala Lumpur City Hall as part of the conditions for approval in respect of a
property development project undertaken by our Group in Mont Kiara, Kuala
Lumpur by way of instalments from February 2016 to November 2017. As at
the LPD, our Group has settled around RM11.17 million of the development
charges payable.
Our Group intends to use up to around RM3.59 million for part payment of
the remaining development charges whilst the balance will be funded by our
Group’s internally-generated funds.

MKH discloses above in a public document in May last year.

It does not form part of the SPA. Not a fair request.

finally you appear! strangely this project gets so much doubt about the main road JK4. even the osc submission already stated JK4!

maybe you can post some official plans that shows the condo and the roads to be built from where to where, because all this doubts flying around is not helpful.