well lin00b, basically agents earn more on traditional products than ILP
INSURANCE TALK, ok let start
INSURANCE TALK, ok let start
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 03:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
well lin00b, basically agents earn more on traditional products than ILP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 07:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
maybe different companies have different commission scheme. As i know traditional products like Critical Illness and whole life products yield more commission. But anyway, starting from next year every insurance company will have to disclose agents commission in ILP products. Better for the customer!
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
emm co-insurance actually not a plan. its just part of the expense that you will need to pay urself during claims. For example: medical cards they have 10% co-insurance and some companies have max cap like RM 500. As HHalphaomega said its all depends on companies.
|
|
|
Dec 28 2009, 04:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2009, 11:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
There's a product from GE called MediCare 100 which offers whole-in-one medical benefits until age 100 but it's more like a whole life policy than a a standalone medical card.
Actually GE does have standalone medical card ---GMC 2 |
|
|
Dec 31 2009, 12:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
i think covers till 80 would be safer. As our lifespan is bout 72. And true PruHealth is only a rider, it must be attached to a life policy. if you finding for cheap medical card. look for General Insurance company.
However, you must take note of few things, 1) whether its is guaranteed renewal 2) Make sure u take a higher limit coverage ( lifetime and annual limit) This is because if your coverage is very low, what you want to do if your limit is finished? buy another one? No life insurance company would accept you by then. 3) Check the co-insurance charges and also the range of room and board fees. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 1 2010, 04:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
QUOTE(poolcarpet @ Dec 31 2009, 02:18 PM) is this true? if i buy a medical insurance from one company, then finish the limit and i won't be able to buy another medical insurance? what about if it's with the same insurance company? Yea, Morning is true. Well, you might end up loading ( extra premium) or they will not accept you. From the same company? You just finished their limiits. Some dont even let you renew the medical card every year if they know your health are getting worse and do you think that time other company will accept you? Thats why guaranteed renewal is important also. |
|
|
Jan 4 2010, 01:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
QUOTE(poolcarpet @ Jan 4 2010, 12:44 AM) say someone bought the lowest medical coverage, just take pruhealth 100 for example. coverage is rm50k annual, rm500k lifetime. coverage till 70. btw, 500k is already not a low coverage. If it happen that the person only encounter 3 accidents and after that he is fully recovered ( without any fractured or broken body parts), then the company might consider accept him. However, normally people will not use up so much in accident without serious permanent injury. say this person is 30, but someone is very unfortunate and encountered 3 accidents (nothing work related, say maybe road accident) before he's 50. and say the surgery and related costs came up to RM510k. assuming he could make claims more than 50k annual (pru has some option for that, i understand) and he finished his lifetime rm500k and wanted to get another medical insurance at age 50. are you guys saying insurance companies may not want to accept him? and prudential itself may not accept him? can't be, right? yes, maybe he has to go through medical checks, yes, maybe the premiums will be higher due to his history of claims. but surely he will still be able to get some cover? if this is the situation, everyone will be scrambling to get the highest possible medical coverage, e.g. pruhealth 400 (1.5 million lifetime). just wondering out loud On the other hand, if it happens that the person used up the limits not because of accidents but illness such as leukemia, kidney dialysis, or cancer treatment, etc. Those illnesses need continuous treatments and when he used up all the limits, do you think any companies will sell him and then they need to prepare to settle the bills more than the patient ever pay? (lets say RM 500 a year, 50 years cost bout 25000, just a claim might cost away 30k). Let say for the same situation you given above, company has right to not accept you, you have no legal binding that company has to accept you. It may just happen that no companies wanted to accept you. I have a lot of customers unable to buy medical cards because of that. Not that you need to buy the highest, but normally people always have the mindset that ' i just want the cheapest and lowest protection only'. More than 300k would be fine. This post has been edited by weikian: Jan 4 2010, 01:30 AM |
|
|
Jan 4 2010, 07:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
|
|
|
Jan 9 2010, 12:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
QUOTE(solarwing @ Jan 9 2010, 08:02 AM) My friend offer me one plan as bellow attachment, looking for somebody advice on it. Nice plan. Just make sure with the agent about the savings. Because i think the benefits they put in is quite a lot. And the insurance charges will increase with your age. Maybe your premium and savings will not be able to cover the high insurance charges at high age.[attachmentid=1389576] |
|
|
Jan 10 2010, 02:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
We are not supposed to say the plan is not good. The plan actually had its own benefits. The problem is whether is it what you need or want. PA and medical might be good enough but the protection is still not complete. Insurance is like umbrella, when raining heavily, you will hope that the umbrella would be bigger. However, when you do not have an umbrella then its already too late to go home and get one.
Get the most protection from what you can afford. Insurance is a lifetime commitment, so think twice. |
|
|
Jan 11 2010, 06:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
H & S might able to pay for CI medical fees. But CI main purpose is to replace the income during the diagnosed or treatment of CI. Consider tha PA and Life only pay out when death. I wouldn't say that 50k is worthless cover, but 50k is definitely not enough. Besides, we should allocate 10% of our income for insurance.
Remember no body ever went bankrupt from paying premium, however people do went bankrupt for not paying the life insurance premium. |
|
|
Jan 11 2010, 10:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
Pjusa, 10% is the maximum amount and all the insurance is included in it. As i know, we got 5 main parts to cover,
1) Death 2) Total Permanent Disability 3) Medical card or H&S 4) Critical illness 5) Personal Accident Each parts are equally important and short of one you will still considered under insured. Some of the products in market cover all the protection with only RM 150 per month. Consider your income of 3k , RM 150 is only 5%. Although 10% might not enough but try to cover all with it. Maybe you all prefer PA and Medical Card but my opinion is that even though the chances might be little, i wouldn't wan to gamble with my life. This is just my opinion and i totally respect your choice. This post has been edited by weikian: Jan 11 2010, 10:54 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2010, 04:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
Separate investment and insurance is good provided that you have the discipline to invest the rest of the money and also if you were familiar with other investment method. My opinion. Term insurance and invest the rest would be good for those who have knowledge and time to do the investment.
|
|
|
Jan 13 2010, 10:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
QUOTE(vandoren @ Jan 13 2010, 09:31 AM) may i know what is the differ between tranditional insurance and investment link insurance in terms of advantages and limitation. Traditional and ILP both have their benefits.i've compare my insurance package with my friends. Mine is tranditional where i have to pay a fix amount till the end of policy (if not mistaken) while most of my friend buy investment link insurance. i found that normally their payment is cheaper than mine for same coverage, let's say 200K life insurance. Next, a friend told me that she only need to pay for 20 years, after that she no need pay for the insurance but she'll still be under protection. ILP you can get big protection in young age with cheap premium. However, when we are getting older, the insurance charges will increase drastically. Thus, if you were paying quite a low premium for that, your cash value inside the policy might not sufficient to cover the insurance charges and riders. Traditional policy might be more expensive compared to ILP. However, the premium is fix because it do not have insurance charges for that. Another benefits is that the death benefits will continue to increase with age. Lets say you buy 100k protection at age 30, the amount of protection will increase with the cash value and it might reached 400-500k, and with the same premium you pay. Like me i bought a life insurance at age 1 about RM20 per month, now i still paying RM 20 per month and the protection is massive. Besides, traditional and ILP both have premium holiday. Means you still can do the same thing as your friend after paying for a certain years. After all, Traditional or ILP is both depends on your needs. |
|
|
Jan 13 2010, 05:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
QUOTE(vandoren @ Jan 13 2010, 02:13 PM) Can you explain on the highlighted part? Insurance charges are charges that they charge on your protection and also riders attached. Lets say RM 100 monthly now and his age is 25. Insurance charges and commission will be deducted from the RM 100 and the left will be used to buy units for investment. Because his age now, his insurance charges will be lower than the premium, and therefore you can see some growth in your cash value as there are money left to buy investment units. However, insurance charges might increase with your age just like medical card. You can still continue to pay RM 100 premium, but if the insurance charges is more than RM 100 a month, then company will sell off your units to pay the insurance charges. So now, you can still pay RM 100 BUT your cash value will decreases consequentially until there are no more investment unit in your policy. That time, you can choose to pay higher premium or lapse your policy. That's why its better to pay higher premium now to build up your cash value. Just an example, my friend bought an ILP let's say my friend paying 100 monthly for a coverage of MC - 90K, life - 100K, accident - 50K. so, by the age 40 or late 50, she will still need to pay 100 monthly only to maintain the same coverage? sounds like ILP is good that we pay cheap to get big protection? then, i'm still not sure what's the traditional insurance's advantages over ILP. Can explain on the below case? ILP: Pro- Able to enjoy higher protection with low premium at low age. Cons- The insurance charges will increase along with age, and your value inside might be eroded. Traditional : Pro- The premium will never increase, no insurance charges incurred. The death benefits and cash value will increase with your age. Cons- Premium of the same protection might be more expensive than the ILP Conclusion, traditional and ILP run together would be the best. Just my opinion. This post has been edited by weikian: Jan 13 2010, 05:13 PM |
|
|
Jan 13 2010, 05:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
QUOTE(vandoren @ Jan 13 2010, 05:34 PM) thanks all for the explaination Yea, there are no best products in the market. Agents are the most important factor to cater a plan that will suit their clients' need and affordability. Most importantly, client should be able to get to the agent when they need them the most. That's why they get the commission for!i understand that the best insurance is the coverage that suit our needs with affordable payment. however, I'm not sure how many agents out there are sincerely recommend suitable insurance to their clients. i believe that some agents only wish to get high commision regardless if the customer really need the insurance/saving plan. just my 2 cents~ |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0595sec
0.51
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 04:09 PM |