QUOTE(V12Kompressor @ Feb 16 2012, 10:15 PM)
some ING panel clinic has a special device to swipe the card only instead of filling out forms.
hi V12, thanks for the clarification. after many years only i know what the layer means for..
QUOTE(MaxWealth @ Feb 17 2012, 01:37 AM)
Sorry for the late reply..
hi Max.. thanks for the reply..
QUOTE
Hmm, actually you know what? actually waiver is a decreasing CI term. Usually waived up to age 70 only. That means, age 71, you still need to continue to pay for the premium. But suppose not a big problem...
Yes. so far, only ILP has this kind of waiver thing. However, you can consider decreasing term (death/tpd/CI) but the cost is higher than the cost of insurance of the waiver in ILP because it covers death and tpd as well. Waiver in ILP doesn't provide any benefits on death and tpd.
i thought the waiver provide benefit for both tpd and life when u declared got CI and cover CI and death once u declared TPD. isn't it the it works?
QUOTE
Let me see, your concern is, let say the insured utilize RM 200k payout from the CI as medical/ living fund due to XYZ reasons, when this insured pass away, he will not have any money left for his next kin and this is the purpose you want a waiver?
true.. that is the reason
QUOTE
Let say your premium is RM 3k per year. what if the insured pass away after 2 years?
He will get the fund value + extra 6k from waiver?
Why not increase the life portion to 100k or 200k extra.
Make it life RM 400k, CI 200k.
That means (example)
death,tpd: RM 400k+ fund value
CI: RM 200k first, upon death another 200k+ fund value.
I think this can settle his problem in a more effective way. However, the relative cost is slightly higher.
Yes, a 20 years term and a term up to age 70 has big difference in the premium.
Because 20 years term, you are averaging the younger 20 years cost and calcualted it into premium
And if up tp 70 years old, you are averaging the total cost up to age 70 ( the older, the higher the risk (as well as cost).
yups.. that is the reason i'm looking for ILP to give thorough study whether it really can solve my difficulty and worth or not. if i want to stay with my current protection but meet my new requirement, i can increase both the sum assured and extend the years but the cost is very expensive. so now i'm comparing this cost with the ILP for long term one. i know if comparing it with current time ILP will win definitely but how will it be after many years. i've never involved with this ILP thing so all things are vague now. need to study all the ILP plan to see whether i really need it and which plan suit me most.
anyway many2 thanks for ur input. gives me a lot of different ways to think about the options and clarify many doubt.
thanks..