as for me, same thinkin wif bro Ichi, 1 player for each department. We shud be gud to go.

CB > Stones (can occasionally play RB). If can't get Stones, at least Varane or Marquinhos
DM > POGBA! (just kidding). Realistically someone with experience, seems like we're linked with Sneijder? 2-3 years ago I would say yes. But now Sneijder is like 31 right? Actually we need some robust box to box midfielder to partner with Matic. Maybe someone like Nainggolan and Witsel. I think they are more realistic target.
CF > Lewan! (just kidding too). More realistic target would be Cavani.

what happened in the backroom? same old story la since last transfer window.

Mou highlighted the players that he wanted. Stones. But what is board and Emelano's decision? sign Rahman (inexperienced player that has not played in PL), Pedro (unproven in other league n team since he only played for Barca), Djilobodji (not even Mou's choice).

Just look at first season Mou is back. He so quick in signing the players and position that he highlighted. His decision to sign Costa, Matic and Fab just revitalized the whole team. Rmb that?

I bet the board told him this last season. 'U've won the league with these players, so why break the bank in this transfer window? U can win the league with this set of players, surely u can do it again. So no mega signings, no Stone, no Pogba.'

I haz sad.     

I still hope he will come as our manager for the third time (i highly doubt about it though).

If company tukar boss then ok je.
Those on and off field things also contributed to it I think. The Eva incident divided the dressing room I think.

Chelsea have been rejected by Carlo Ancelotti as they look to quickly replaced the sacked José Mourinho. (Source: Sky Italia)

now managers scared to take the Chelsea job now.

summary?

^
and also, some players wanted to leave Chelsea after winning last season. Mourinho wanted to keep them and wanted major signings to secure a title defence.

before Porto game, team sheet got leaked that he was dropping Fabregas

No win situation for Chelsea, regardless.

Chelsea win, shows the players have been playing below their best efforts (as statistics have proven). Which shows them to be a fickle bunch who actually thinks they're bigger than anything and can actually choose which manager to play for. Bad for their careers, bad for Chelsea as a whole. Like the Sunderland situation, would you want to manage a club where the players have such a strong say in whether you're a "good" manager? And if they don't like you they just stop performing?

Chelsea lose, shows it wasn't Mourinho's fault. The players are just spent, and a clearout is required. At the time when Chelsea has just let go of the best manager they ever had.

i know it's painful. but for whatever reason is club comes first. not manager not player.
for a supporter who want the club to lose, sorry i find it offending.

i admit im one of fan who want mourinho to be replaced.
but not ever for once i want the club to lose when mouriho manage the club.
for me if the club win, good. i admit im wrong for calling his head.
and move on.

We never know what happen behind the scene. Maybe players at fault, maybe mourinho.

The board hv no other option, continue with mourinho and risk our premier league status or sack mourinho and hope for a fresh start from the team. The club interest is everyone highest priority after all.

didnt manage to catch the game.
so what's the verdict?? players play like normal or Sunderland too shit?
who are the snakes in the grass??

merry-go-round spinning?
Mourinho agrees a deal to take MU job. LvG getting sacked soon

apparently mourinho already signed a 5 year contract with Man Utd. LvG head already on the chopping board, waiting to get chopped