Important to tell also if your reload with CC is subject to service charge and if yes how much.

I still dun understand why reporting in first page that kinrara petronas got 1% surcharge is not allowed.
The reason stated "BY LAW surcharge/fee on CC usage is illegal"... then this means it is this petrol station that has violated the law. The user who reports this did not violate the law by telling the truth of what he/she experienced.

In addition, since this petrol station charge 1% is not classified as OSA, what is the rationale that this point cannot be shared in page 1?

The only reason i can think of is that this petrol station is owned by the moderator who block this issue.

This post has been edited by trojant: Apr 14 2016, 06:22 PM

Not challenging u being the TS.. in fact really appreciate the sharing spirit & keep the list updated.

My point is, all page 1 info were also merely online statement by forumer, i doubt u go to each and every merchant to confirm b4 posting.
So, what's wrong believing the forumer that mentioned 1% surcharge?

In fact I got "conned" by believing the first page info on the MCC thread. So, should I sue the TS or go beat the forumer that said those wrong info?

Why so afraid?

This post has been edited by trojant: Apr 15 2016, 09:39 AM

read thru, but did not find any rationale about prohibition to mention 1% surchage.
In fact in the thread you mentioned - post #3, it also specifically mentioned about "... AirAsia and their "Convenience fees..."

This post has been edited by trojant: Apr 15 2016, 10:39 AM

Pls enlighten me how u comprehend the context.
A T&Cs suppose to allow a person to comprehend what is meant in words, and not ask a reader to read the context set in the mind of the writer.

This post has been edited by trojant: Apr 15 2016, 10:57 AM

Agree with WhitE LighteR. No intention to find fault of TS, but do not understand the prohibition to inform about 1% surcharge.

Success reload with cc... does that means successful get CB too??
I understand the list in page 1 consider both success reload + success CB.

When you said "recommended cards to use", you are sharing 2 info at same time 1) merchant accept CC for TnG, AND 2) particular transaction may benefit u getting a CB with the recommended card.
In this case, only point 1 is informed by the forumer and point 2 is no at all mentioned, but u "assume" if 1) true, then 2) true.
This make the list misleading then.

I don't agree. There could be possibly that particular terminal has different MCC.
Unless the cardholder called and confirmed in the forum.

Also, by assuming 1) is true, hence 2) is true, then cybpsych is against his own principle that he will usually "ensure info is proper and correct" before posting in the list. In this case, forumer reports 1) is true (reload using CC), but did not mention 2) is true (get CB).

Of course, add whatever like/dislike/trusted/not trusted... just tat these will defeat the purpose of the forum, i.e. to keep forumer informed of the "verified" info - as what I have been told earlier.
I fully understand and aware that we cannot 100% trust the info available from the internet.

Compare these 2 statements:

(A) "Add Jaya Grocer @ Evolve Concept Mall into the list. Successfully reload with cc without any problem."

(B) "I have been getting cash back every month by reloading TnG and paying my bills in Sam's Groceria"

I believe u see the difference.

What benefit to have 1 lumpsum credit card transaction vs split to multiple transactions?
Does it really matter?

do you know if the credit card charge is "RM1 for any amount" or "RM1 for every RM100"?
Let say i reload rm200 card 1 + rm200 card 2, will be charged in credit card RM400+RM1, or RM400+RM4?
Any idea?

TQ