tachlio still haven't remove the "Tips for CVT" section?

I've mentioned it previously as the article is for BUVs not modern CVTs found in the Honda City. Some members of this thread may find it confusing

Not content with giving out misinformation about cars, now you upgrade to dishing out unsolicited advise on relationship and marriage?

TOPKEK tahap gaban

I heard will affect your ECU

mohon pencerahan Jeffreynsx

In your case, will probably knock and cement.

Cut and weld are usually last resort where the part cannot be repaired or the metal itself is torn. That area is not load bearing, so JPJ won't be concerned unless the cut/weld goes all the way to the tulang behind that part.

Depending on the damage, Covering with sideskirts will have varying results.

In the case of honda city, cannot replace.

The whole piece in the red outline is a single continuous piece.



This post has been edited by dares: Jan 11 2016, 05:10 PM

Technically it can be done, it's an outer shell welded to the chassis and it is not load-bearing.

But it will be very expensive, you have to cut the whole thing off the chassis and weld a new one on to it, just to fix a relatively small damage. Unless the damage is very extensive (eg. the whole rear quarter panel torn asunder), otherwise it's just un-economical to replace the whole thing.

Not to mention, if the workshop botch the job, the whole piece becomes a misaligned mess.

Placement of the weights matter. The balancing weights are place far from the hub (center of the rotating mass), compared to the lugnuts, therefore those relatively weights can exert considerable force even if they are lightweight.

ie: a 5g weight placed 18cm from the center exerts the same force as a 30g weight place 3cm from the center.

Not saying who's right and who's wrong, since a 5g weight at the wrong place of the rim might also unbalance the wheel. Just wanna clarify it since you compared lugnuts to balancing weights.

kek

EDIT: picture removed as per requested by TS.

This post has been edited by dares: Feb 6 2016, 10:40 AM

Rotate tires is to spread out the wear evenly among 4 tires.

If you never rotate your tires, the front tires will wear out sooner than the rear.

Only if your policy is "Agreed Value". If you policy is "Market value", then the compensation will follow the vehicle's market value at the time of the claim.

Call your insurer to inquire if they offer Agreed Value policy for your make and model.

This post has been edited by dares: Apr 12 2016, 08:27 PM

Oh sorry, didnt see you guys were talking about HIP

No stabilizer bar? You sure anot?

Stay away from Continental.

Check here

http://www.honda.com.my/service_maintenance/product_update

http://www.zerotohundred.com/newforums/sho...ad.php?t=444822

My personal experience using CPC2 that came stock on my Ford - noisy, lousy grip, very poor tread wear. You know what they say about rotating your tires (front to back, back to front) every 10k km? Well I never did that because the front tires wear out so quickly compared to the rears.

This post has been edited by dares: May 5 2016, 12:36 PM