QUOTE(Ah SiAnG @ Oct 22 2015, 06:54 AM)
you did mentioned these right? --> "its not really a "sekatan"" and "even if u apply, it dont guaranteed to be approve", aren't your statement contradicting and misleading?
how can you say that it is not really a sekatan when in fact it is a sekatan where you are required to make an application for State Authority's consent to transfer or charge your property?
you do note that your application for State Authority's consent to transfer and its subsequent appeal against rejection may be rejected causing you not to be able dispose of your property right? if it is not really a "sekatan" then do you mind telling me what it is actually?
what it meant by sekatan kepentingan/restriction in interest is that your interest over your property is restricted when you require the State Authority's consent to transfer or charge your property.
maybe my level of understanding is low but do you mind to enlighten me why you said that it is not really a sekatan when in fact it is a sekatan kepentingan?

debating just only for the sake of term really wasting time. how could i explain word definition in a layman term, without mentioning my word subjective??!
i am telling him that it is not totally unsellable or cannot sell at all, compared to MCL restriction.
that is why i put "" at the first place!your level of understanding and my level of my experience dealing with these two might be different.
so my argument stops here. u want to debate of term? go on proceed with three or four pages with list of wikipedia links or malaysian bar council links.
This post has been edited by suadrif: Oct 22 2015, 08:13 AM