QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Nov 19 2015, 09:19 AM)
Yes, long term 8% IRR is consider good. Just that these few years market is considerably "good", I expect more that what I am getting with 90% EQ in my portfolio...
It is the last mile that can pull the average to above average. Exclude the 10% in MM or bond, and consider it as part of your total asset in FD and cash. Maybe then you could see the reason of having money in equities instead of having it lingering in lesser risk MM and bond funds; and having every dollar set aside for investment in UT to work harder.
===========
The culcalation in IRR needs only 3 pieces of info: the date and value of the capital outlay (including any service charges/commissions), and the total current value of the portfolio.
One can make switches and trade as often as he likes, and not affect the IRR. (As mentioned above, the IRR needs only 3 pieces of info.) The switches can only affect the IRR if the switches can change the total value of the portfolio.
The million dollar question is how to time the switches. And if the timing is right, how bold one must be to make HUGE switches such that the total value of the portfolio will be GREATLY affected.
Get the timing wrong, the total value of the portfolio (and the IRR) will be negatively affected. When switches are done over a long term, maybe sometimes getting it right, sometimes getting it wrong... which is same as not doing any swithces.
So it all goes back to the basic of regular investments and putting money that was set aside, for the purpose of UT investment, into Equity (not MM or Bond) funds...
(Getting the first several steps correct is important... if one begins on a wrong footing, the next money/purchase will need to work extra hard to craw back and pull the IRR up and above average.)