The scaneagle is actually used by the army via DRB
so the experience is there, maybe there is another reason they chose the thales
nanti modern war"fair" expert mati meroyan
They offered, seems like we are not really keen on it

looks like the MMEA refuse to share with Army
even though they just can order new ones from DRB

The reality is everyone need isis. 

Assad and the gang need isis to blow his opposition to kingdom come and sec war with sunni under fighting terrorism flag

Turkey need for oil money to down assad and syiah sec

West need to justify military spending

Arab need for sec war with syiah. 

And people keep asking why thet so resilient

how about using sulu threat in malaysia, so can justify buying MPA, MRSS, MBT, Attack helicopter，Amry transport helicopter etc..... 

well went your dominate air power， just time mater to taken out ...
jet fighter can flight close to your missile/radar base to release missile ( anti-radiation missile) or air-ground missile，even GPS/satelite precision guided glide bomb。 about 100-120km than leave the area, and your missile still not able to attack enemy jet fighter, your only can fire if jet figther close to half missile range. so after detect enemy missile depend how many missile your have to kill in coming missile. usually need fire 2 to counter each missile coming.
If have stealth figther more better，they can coming untill 80-90km release missile.

yes,  technically latest-generation SAM can take down modem aircraft.
but is not easy compare to last time, aircraft much easy to take down SAM from far distance,
SAM just take a beating, deplete war, depend how long can sustain. 
compare technology, aircraft have more improvement in technology in aircraft also to air-ground missile, more type and more range
also jamming from aircraft.
if no have choice between defense SAM/ Jet fighter i will choose Jet fighter.

the tracked is preference for the formation of our armoured brigade

our army is still very much conventional, tank for support, sph will be back support and must be able to keep up with the tank regardless of the ground terrain. the personal carrier is wheeled because they need to fast to deploy upon successful assault

that the issues.. all come in one but all we have is the bits and pieces

MRSS suppose to enable fast deployment of force but also tak ada

SPH suppose to support tank but 10years until now tak ada

MRCA suppose to enable better ground attack and the mkm will solely focus in air to air combat but also tak ada

Medium air defense to support advancing force.. but until now still with manpads. Starstreak is still a point defence system

attack helo.. aiyo... kesian also tak ada

Malaysia just signed contract for 6 MD-530G Little Bird.

they already have a layered defence placed there.. making any SEED operation super hard

now they only need eyes in the sky and that would complete their air defense system.. sadly the US have a better system in this section (E3) compared to the russian (A50)

The lahad datu incident also the same. Being poke also like no effect on the political

they more trigger happy on opposition having dinner with kiram daugther than to beef up security

even the recent beheading have little or no impact 

and best they epeect the armed forces to perform 110% with all those bits a pieces 

According to Marhalim's previous article the 6 helicopters will be jointly operated by RMAF & PUTD.

but the s300 and s400 is still not battle proven. The s200 is have shown it effective especially cold war era fighters

nevertheless,

it deployments along side pantsir is gonna make US and other flight more difficult except france and the jews
it a heli tailored for special operation from it birth.. i doubt they will use it by any tom dick and harry even in the RMAF and PUTD

Is it really necessary for Russia to go to China for missile tech? I still have the impression Russia is king in all things related to ICBM.

why need df21d.. they already have K-300.. even making coastal landing in syria.. a danger for ships.

one need one russia boat sink to deploy haha

Whatever is said about it, I'm somehow still not convinced an ICBM warhead from orbit has the necessary accuracy to hit a moving target.

Brahmos? Moskit? Cold War era AS-5 Kelts*? Tak ingat the rest
*edit: AS-4 Kitchen, AS-16 Kickback

No lar both sides trying not to provocate. Rusiya also didn't deploy medium air-to-air missiles until that stupid SU-24 incident.