Actually sgpv originally plan to have s100 uav.
They even tested it on the French gowind ship.
Later malaysia did not proceed as it might go above budget.
There are some rumors it might some sponsor for uav system.
So many twist and turn. 

Oto Melara 76mm Super Rapid Gun with stealth cupola finally installed on the Indonesian Navy first Sigma PKR 10514.



Credit to antifamous & kruk.

looks like the MMEA refuse to share with Army
even though they just can order new ones from DRB

West does not need Isis to justify military spending.
They even spit tons of bs in buying f35 but they never include Isis inside those bs.

because many new toys being displayed there.
Libya and Nigeria only have your standard AA gun on a toyota

it's because it's mostly RU news/propaganda sites boasting Russia's power and the threat of ISIS/Turkey/Nato/US.
and most of the time only RU news site spam military stuff that much because Russian population like the Russia stronk image......while most of the West cares more about Mariah Carey than the next nuclear missile. 

I mean seriously........how often do you see CNN or BBC boasting Nato's latest guns and stuff ? compared to RT and sputnik.

intresting...

seems Europe is not bothered with developing a Stealth Eurofighter
all forced to buy f35

Of course, but it's extremely dangerous. Imagine trying to kill something that solely designed to kill you. Get something wrong, and it's essentially a suicide mission for any attack airplane.

Very well-planned air defense coverage can nullify even a powerful air force. In 1973 Yom Kippur war Egyptian SAM system very effetively limited IDF air force ability to launch attacks. While the IDF still dominated the air-to-air battle due to its superior US-made fighters, but found it very hard to launch ground attacks in the face of Soviet-made SAM and AA gun batteries.

From some sources I read said out of IDF 303 aircraft lost in battle (not counting accidents and crashes), only about 12 were lost to air-to-air combat while the the rest were lost from SAM and AA fire.

It's not like air defense tech also stayed still from the 70's. Fighter tech moved hand-in-hand with anti-aircraft tech. It's kinda inevitable. Any advantage each side has will inevitably be countered by the other.

Back then the Phantoms and Skyhawks were state-of-the-art fighters and still they got shot down by the SAMs of their generation. So it's not outside possibility today's latest-generation fighters can still fall victim to the latest-generation SAMs.

Can be consider as attack heli meh?

At best light attack heli, but should just be light scout heli right?

That depend on how effective it is on the layer defense.
For example Russia s-400 will have pantsir as point defense. If they decide it is not enough they could add combat air patrol, aew, signit aircraft and so on.
As for stealth fighter I think it will be hard for them to get close around 100km as they will get higher chances to be detected.
F18G will have tough luck to get close enough to jam those radar.
Defeating those s-400 will be toughest sead mission ever.

I  prefer both.
You still need SAM to protect your airbase.
What the use of the runway being blast off.

that the issues.. all come in one but all we have is the bits and pieces

MRSS suppose to enable fast deployment of force but also tak ada

SPH suppose to support tank but 10years until now tak ada

MRCA suppose to enable better ground attack and the mkm will solely focus in air to air combat but also tak ada

Medium air defense to support advancing force.. but until now still with manpads. Starstreak is still a point defence system

attack helo.. aiyo... kesian also tak ada

I don't get why people are scared of heavy tanks in tropical environment. The tank's caterpillar tracks spread out its weight over a larger area. Instead of concentrating all of its weight on a few road tyres like a normal wheeled vehicle, a caterpillar track spread the vehicle's weight over a significantly larger surface area, lowering the ground pressure.

A 65+ ton M1 Abrams tank has a lower ground pressure (100 Psi) than an average 1 ton family car (190 Psi). The main problem tanks have on soft ground or off-road situations are the tracks themselves, which are made from hard metal that will do damage to driving surfaces by churning up the soft ground, but that is the inevitable effect of using tracks on soft ground, not due to the weight of the vehicles themselves. Even a 1 ton vehicle using a caterpillar track will do this type of damage, so the weight of a tank is irrelevant in this matter.