Anyone mind to explain the Aluminium and link to autism?

but no using vaccines then die liao lo...............................

especially for SARS..............bird flu........................

People with anti-vax mentality should just stay in their anti-vax group & die off lol

oic, tq doctor

vaccines are for preventing.

sick edy only inject vaccines for what?
mercury is small dosage is safe.

Heck even overdose of water can be lethal.

Maybe you are right.

Or maybe you are wrong...

Damn it, which one should I believe????

So, are you oppose the use of vaccine? and if u have children do you already inject them with vaccine?

that is fcking why the herd immunity is important!
vaccines are given at certain ages. parents would know, coz all babies born are given a small booklet and everytime vaccine the doctor will sign.

if idiots dont vaccinate when it spreads, the younger ones who are not strong enough to be vaccinated yet will suffer.
READ UP ON THE DEVASTATION OF POLIO AND SMALLPOX back before the 1900s.  i have only read them in encyclopedias and books, and already i am scared. nowadays if my kids just take a bit of a risk to prevent things like whopping cough and smallpox, it is worth it.

anyways u dont wanna vaccinate, fine. just dont let them hang around children, coz u will affect the herd immunity. lock them in the basement. i wont complain. if u put ur unvaccinated kids near my kids, i will beat the shit out of u.

if you're talking about flu then yes, it's not that effective
need to have yearly jab

but polio? tb? measles? whooping cough? you dare not to get the vaccine?

yes, but if enough of these people bring their unvaccinated kids around, they will infect the ones that are too young to be vaccinated
for me thats selfish. but i cant force other people to beat the shit out of parents who bring their unvaccinated children around.
but i will.

That doesn't sound like relevant analogy.

In any case, the whole anti-vax nonsense is overblown anyway.

the webcomic is pretty self-explanatory.

My take on vaccines:
1) are they beneficial?
Generally, yes. Too beneficial. There are too many f*cking humans on the planet today as a result of the invention of vaccines.

2) do some people react badly
Yes, but adverse reactions far less than those that can safely accept them, and also dependent on the particular vaccine

3) do we need to vaccinate?
My take is that we should have basic vaccination for the stuff that's really important. The rest only on a per needs basis. That should help balance risk out. E.g., I wouldn't want to bother taking a yellow fever vaccine since I don't need to travel to South America, but a BCG shot would make sense for a baby/child since TB is endemic to Malaysia.

My take on why some people are opposed to vaccines:
1) ignorance
-the advent of the internet has not made people smarter. Just confused and irrational.

2) religious / philosophical reasons
-similar to the above.

3) fear and distrust of authority and big pharma
- this one is the main underlying reason these days. It is true that in the past there was some industrial accident that caused a certain batch of vaccines to make people sick. Also it is potentially true that some times there's some fear mongering or profit oriented decisions by big pharma which may be construed as not being wholly beneficial to the public, but this in itself does not mean that vaccines do not work.
To make an analogy: just because planes can crash it doesn't make air travel as a whole extremely dangerous. Maybe there are some models or designs or airlines with bad maintenance records which are more accident prone, but on the whole it does not refute the fact that air travel is basically safe for the general populace. The proof is in the pudding.

There's studies on the protective titre of antibodies.

You like the story of small pox?

When Edward Jenner proved the principle of vaccination about 200 years ago, Big Pharma ™ didn't exist yet. Are you sure you are not conflating your distrust of authority/USA/Jews/CIA etc with the proven effectiveness of vaccination? The overwhelming proof that vaccines work is that there are far too many humans on this planet today.

I'm not sure what your point is here. You show me a link that effectively argues the real life correlation between vaccination and public health data and you say it's not enough.
Your arguments show to me that you are basically distrustful of Big Pharma. It's a free world I'm sure but I hope you stop conflating your distrust of Big pharma and the scientific validity of vaccination. They are 2 separate things. I'd lay off the confirmation bias Kool-aid if I were you.

Just show how shallow your knowledge on contagious disease.

T_T

I still prefer the time when AllnGap only postan about fans and less shit posting on the internet.

Just show how shallow your knowledge on contagious disease.

in african got some ppl develop immunity from hiv n aids.

u went to tiger beer uni ah bro?

there is no if, you are shallow in thinking that HPV can only be contracted via piap piap.

Well, smallpox was eradicated in the 1980s, and in Jenner's time, his work gained increasing acceptance after his work was replicated by doctors elsewhere. What's your point?
You see what I mean? (obviously you don't) Big Pharma is Big Pharma. You still can't deny vaccination as a whole works and it is a separate issue from that of HPV vaccine. Your beef against HPV has to be held separate but you are conflating it.

As for the HPV vaccine, granted it can't provide immunity against ALL HPV (roughly 40 types) but it does target the 4 most dangerous or pervasive types of HPV.
Since it is a preventive vaccine it's supposed to be more effective if given before people become sexually active. It can't cure existing infections la. That's why the target of vaccination are younger females.