Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Condominium Facilities, Need to pay for using condo facilities!?

views
     
aurora97
post Sep 7 2015, 06:44 PM

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,789 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



Whyvdelay so long for common property to be ready? Common facility not ready also can get CF??? Lol... Something funny going on.

Is it a service apartment or Condo?

Wat does schedule five of your spa say?
aurora97
post Sep 8 2015, 01:03 PM

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,789 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



QUOTE(kochin @ Sep 8 2015, 08:21 AM)
few scenarios.
it could be cost of maintenance indeed exclude wear and tear of specific facilities.
hence collection only from the residents who utilise such facilities.
and it could be utilisation of these specific facilities directly incurred additional cost (eg. spotlight for tennis at night).
anyway, the problem i feel is developers nowadays provide a lot of useless facilities. and all these adds up in terms of maintenance fees. sigh!
*
i can't see anywhere in the SMA that there's a specific carve out for the term "common property".

it is the duty of the JMB/MC to maintain the common property using funds from the "maintenance account".

in relation to wear and tear or whether the floodlights should be turned on, it should be inclusive within the term of common property. In this respect, factored into your maintenance fee.

that being said, JMB/MC can restrict the use of floodlights, say until 10pm because it can be nuisance to other owners.

I think the most tricky part of the question is when you have a mix development, how do you apportion maintenance fee between commercial and residential parcels?

Then the question of separate charges may arise.

this issue then again is resolved by setting up a subsidiary JMB/MC, to split the cost and function of certain common property.
aurora97
post Sep 8 2015, 03:42 PM

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,789 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



QUOTE(kochin @ Sep 8 2015, 01:10 PM)
under new act, sub-mc can be formed, no?
eg. if they really want, selected facilities can be parked under sub-mc maintenance and thus incurred separate charges.
and for mixed development, yes, differential charges is possible plus different weightage for the share unit as well.
*
In a perfect environment, when laws are effective, immediately everything overnight is expected to switch over to the new law.

That of course, as I emphasize and re-emphasize, we live in an imperfect world and knowing Malaysia... it just gets better.

I couldn’t agree more with your example but from what I gather from COB, the debt collection of maintenance fees for instance, COB has advise to use existing avenues of recovery rather than go to tribunal (this seem to suggest that they themselves are not ready). Am not sure about subsidiary JMB/MC but I gather it will be Malaysian time as well.


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0158sec    0.41    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 10:40 AM