Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

56 Pages « < 30 31 32 33 34 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Skylake/Kaby/Coffee/Comet/Rocket Lake OC V1, Show off your OC here

views
     
EarlyBirdy
post Jul 11 2018, 05:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jul 11 2018, 05:02 PM)
Each mobo has different VRM configuration and sensors, hence you will likely have different OC experience when changing board.
*
Thanks sifu
Gonna get a better board to test it out
neverfap
post Jul 11 2018, 05:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,147 posts

Joined: Aug 2013


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jul 11 2018, 05:17 PM)
Some software and games like Chrome and BF1 use AVX, so yes.
*
Okay. Cause saw the link u shared
Many of the chip stress test without AVX haha
But i will stick with the AVX smile.gif
wongtheboy92
post Aug 8 2018, 08:29 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


To all 8700k users, which motherboard would you suggest aside from Asrock (i know they are good boards)?
keyo
post Aug 8 2018, 11:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
345 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(wongtheboy92 @ Aug 8 2018, 08:29 PM)
To all 8700k users, which motherboard would you suggest aside from Asrock (i know they are good boards)?
*
Asus
x-1o8-x
post Aug 8 2018, 11:31 PM

Prosekaist
******
Senior Member
1,250 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: the land before time


QUOTE(wongtheboy92 @ Aug 8 2018, 08:29 PM)
To all 8700k users, which motherboard would you suggest aside from Asrock (i know they are good boards)?
*
https://www.overclock.net/forum/attachment....achmentid=99753 you can get some ideas here
wongtheboy92
post Aug 8 2018, 11:54 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(x-1o8-x @ Aug 8 2018, 11:31 PM)
hows ur z370-f? the vrm isnt that on par even with extreme 4. Asus boards are really pricey for me. I guess I might end up getting asrock.
x-1o8-x
post Aug 9 2018, 12:29 AM

Prosekaist
******
Senior Member
1,250 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: the land before time


QUOTE(wongtheboy92 @ Aug 8 2018, 11:54 PM)
hows ur z370-f? the vrm isnt that on par even with extreme 4. Asus boards are really pricey for me. I guess I might end up getting asrock.
*
heh it isn't the best board out there but it was the only decent one available when the 8700k launched

i've had several bumps maintaining 5ghz and the biggest one is the fact i didn't delid the cpu tongue.gif

I feel like doing it now tho biggrin.gif
wongtheboy92
post Aug 9 2018, 10:45 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(x-1o8-x @ Aug 9 2018, 12:29 AM)
heh it isn't the best board out there but it was the only decent one available when the 8700k launched

i've had several bumps maintaining 5ghz and the biggest one is the fact i didn't delid the cpu tongue.gif

I feel like doing it now tho  biggrin.gif
*
So far you are satisfied with the board capability. The better brother would be the maximus x hero with premium quality VRM and Mosfet Chokes etc. That's really a premium board. ASUS UEFI is known to be user-friendly and I think you pretty much easily can overclock.
JoBigShow
post Aug 11 2018, 06:56 PM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


Hi!
Came out of retirement (stop OC'ing since socket 1151) and got myself 8700K + MSI Gaming M5 biggrin.gif

Woah so many new features since last gone into the bios years ago lol, pretty cool really, with LLC can now be tuned specifically for example.

Managed to stabilize 4.8ghz @1.220v (in bios). A little bump in voltage in CPU-Z because LLC @ Mode 3.
Attached Image

Anyway about this AVX thing, it's not really necessary for stress test is it? Specifically Prime95, where you can disable it in local.txt.
And what's the point to offset it where in real application 0 AVX machines won't do extreme load like with all the stress test? Perhaps for Benchmarking purpose?
My system requires 3D rendering and heavy Photoshop usage, prefer to keep the clock fully optimize.

Temp is okay, maxed 75~ish Celsius with prime95 Small FTT with AVX disable, over 2 hours. Can do better when I get some liquid metal TIMs like Thermal Grizzly. Using 240 AIO cooling.
With AVX enable straight gone into 95C wacko.gif


TSowikh84
post Aug 11 2018, 11:06 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(JoBigShow @ Aug 11 2018, 06:56 PM)
Hi!
Came out of retirement (stop OC'ing since socket 1151) and got myself 8700K + MSI Gaming M5  biggrin.gif

Woah so many new features since last gone into the bios years ago lol, pretty cool really, with LLC can now be tuned specifically for example.

Managed to stabilize 4.8ghz @1.220v (in bios). A little bump in voltage in CPU-Z because LLC @ Mode 3.
Attached Image

Anyway about this AVX thing, it's not really necessary for stress test is it? Specifically Prime95, where you can disable it in local.txt.
And what's the point to offset it where in real application 0 AVX machines won't do extreme load like with all the stress test? Perhaps for Benchmarking purpose?
My system requires 3D rendering and heavy Photoshop usage, prefer to keep the clock fully optimize.

Temp is okay, maxed 75~ish Celsius with prime95 Small FTT with AVX disable, over 2 hours. Can do better when I get some liquid metal TIMs like Thermal Grizzly. Using 240 AIO cooling.
With AVX enable straight gone into 95C  wacko.gif
*
For me, AVX is necessary to be tested as some of the software that I use and games that I play are using AVX instructions. Chrome and BF1 for example. I want to make sure that all my applications are running at the highest CPU frequency possible, without any reduced speed. Hence, I prefer to have AVX offset to be set at 0.

Also, your daily applications might not cause extreme load but stress test is about the worst case scenario and you could use it test your thermal capabilities. In this case, AVX offset can be used to reduce the CPU temp within your cooling limit.

For Prime95, rather than Small FTT it is recommend to use custom blend 1344K with the RAM capacity stressed up to 90-95%.
wongtheboy92
post Aug 17 2018, 02:38 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(keyo @ Aug 8 2018, 11:22 PM)
Asus
*
Are you using any Asus Z370 board? drool.gif
keyo
post Aug 17 2018, 08:29 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
345 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(wongtheboy92 @ Aug 17 2018, 02:38 PM)
Are you using any Asus Z370 board?  drool.gif
*
no money to buy asus sad.gif
naqib0307
post Aug 26 2018, 07:43 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
730 posts

Joined: Nov 2013
Hi all sifu,
Idk if im doing the right thing or not . My first time using prime95 sweat.gif sweat.gif



just assemble 8700k with maximus hero.

First i OC to 4.8 with 1.2V, run cinebench and prime95. all looks good. Then i tried 5.0 @ 1.2V --> BSOD biggrin.gif


and finally i try 5.0 GHz @ 1.25V and run for few hours still no bsod. but the temp quite hight

[attachmentid=9992293]

Is this the right way to test the cpu?

This post has been edited by naqib0307: Aug 26 2018, 09:05 PM
TSowikh84
post Aug 26 2018, 09:27 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(naqib0307 @ Aug 26 2018, 07:43 PM)
Hi all sifu,
Idk if im doing the right thing or not . My first time using prime95 sweat.gif  sweat.gif
just assemble 8700k with maximus hero.

First i OC to 4.8 with 1.2V, run cinebench and prime95. all looks good. Then i tried 5.0 @ 1.2V --> BSOD biggrin.gif
and finally i try 5.0 GHz  @ 1.25V and run for few hours still no bsod. but the temp quite hight

Is this the right way to test the cpu?

Nice try but I could see that your prime95 at 5.0GHz is not stable (3 workers has stopped running) probably because of insufficient core voltage.
I'd like to guess the required voltage but first of of all may I know your stock VID? (clear CMOS and check the core voltage in UEFI)

naqib0307
post Aug 26 2018, 10:07 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
730 posts

Joined: Nov 2013
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Aug 26 2018, 09:27 PM)
Nice try but I could see that your prime95 at 5.0GHz is not stable (3 workers has stopped running) probably because of insufficient core voltage.
I'd like to guess the required voltage but first of of all may I know your stock VID? (clear CMOS and check the core voltage in UEFI)
*
oh you're right. I didnt even notice it cry.gif
naqib0307
post Aug 26 2018, 10:12 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
730 posts

Joined: Nov 2013
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Aug 26 2018, 09:27 PM)
Nice try but I could see that your prime95 at 5.0GHz is not stable (3 workers has stopped running) probably because of insufficient core voltage.
I'd like to guess the required voltage but first of of all may I know your stock VID? (clear CMOS and check the core voltage in UEFI)
*
Here my core voltage after clear cmos.
[attachmentid=9992484]
TSowikh84
post Aug 26 2018, 11:02 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(naqib0307 @ Aug 26 2018, 10:12 PM)
Here my core voltage after clear cmos.

1.104v, good chip you got there.
I'm guessing it needs about 1.296v for 5GHz OC.
Also use CPU Load-line Calibration (LLC) level 6 to minimize the load voltage fluctuation.

naqib0307
post Aug 27 2018, 08:59 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
730 posts

Joined: Nov 2013
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Aug 26 2018, 11:02 PM)
1.104v, good chip you got there.
I'm guessing it needs about 1.296v for 5GHz OC.
Also use CPU Load-line Calibration (LLC) level 6 to minimize the load voltage fluctuation.
*
Is it okay to increase the voltage and use it for long term. Last night i change back to 4.8 @ 1.2V the temperature at 100% load looks good around 60+ . but for this 5.0 GHz @1.25 the temperature quite high. max at 90 celcius and most of the time at 80+ at full load. Should i just let it run @ 4,8?
cstkl1
post Aug 27 2018, 09:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(naqib0307 @ Aug 27 2018, 08:59 AM)
Is it okay to increase the voltage and use it for long term. Last night i change back to 4.8 @ 1.2V the temperature at 100% load looks good around 60+ . but for this 5.0 GHz @1.25 the temperature quite high. max at 90 celcius and most of the time at 80+ at full load. Should i just let it run @ 4,8?
*
keep it under 80c.. not that it harms the cpu but above 80.. theres like a wattage leakage which requires higher voltage for stability.

naqib0307
post Aug 27 2018, 09:21 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
730 posts

Joined: Nov 2013
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Aug 27 2018, 09:17 AM)
keep it under 80c.. not that it harms the cpu but above 80.. theres like a wattage leakage which requires higher voltage for stability.
*
Currently just using the X62 out of the box. Should i reapply new thermal paste? i still have my thermal grizzly kryonaut.

56 Pages « < 30 31 32 33 34 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0323sec    0.16    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 04:07 AM