Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

56 Pages « < 26 27 28 29 30 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Skylake/Kaby/Coffee/Comet/Rocket Lake OC V1, Show off your OC here

views
     
king99
post May 4 2018, 11:32 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 4 2018, 11:04 PM)
2.0v vCore? I hope it was a typo  blink.gif
*
eh typo bangwall.gif

1.18 , 1.19 , 1.20
keyo
post May 7 2018, 10:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
345 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


Agak agak batch baru ni sedap tak oc rasa macam nak try nasib sekali lagi jer

This post has been edited by keyo: May 7 2018, 11:00 AM
TSowikh84
post May 7 2018, 11:37 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(keyo @ May 7 2018, 10:59 AM)
Agak agak batch baru ni sedap tak oc rasa macam nak try nasib sekali lagi jer
*
I heard best batches for 8700K are L739 and L740 which were manufactured last year (early batches).
Anyway, I still think that it's all about draw of luck. Batch numbers don't matter.
neverfap
post May 9 2018, 05:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,147 posts

Joined: Aug 2013


Hi guys
Is aorus gaming 5 good enough for 8700k?
hafiez
post May 9 2018, 06:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,980 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Mount Chiliad



QUOTE(neverfap @ May 9 2018, 05:04 PM)
Hi guys
Is aorus gaming 5 good enough for 8700k?
*
Haha im trying 5GHz on gaming 3
TSowikh84
post May 9 2018, 06:36 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(neverfap @ May 9 2018, 05:04 PM)
Hi guys
Is aorus gaming 5 good enough for 8700k?
*
Attached Image
Source: http://www.overclock.net/forum/6-intel-mot...ion-thread.html

AORUS Z370 Gaming 5 (RM891, same tier as ASRock's Fatal1ty Z370 Gaming K6 (RM805) and MSI's Z370 GAMING M5 (RM991).

Z370 Gaming 5 - 8+3 phases, has debug LED, 3x M.2, Wi-Fi
Fatal1ty Z370 Gaming K6 - 6+4 phases, has* debug LED, 2x M.2, no Wi-Fi
Z370 Gaming M5 - 8+2 phases, no debug LED, 2x M.2, no Wi-Fi

Gaming 5 is the best value Z370 board with the highest specs among the three.
Also, like other AORUS series it has best RGB illumination among the Z370 boards in the market.

Cons are:
1) Inaccurate voltage reading due to iTE Super I/O chip being used, rather than Nuvoton which is more superior.
2) UEFI BIOS is quite lacking behind other vendors such as ASUS and ASRock.
3) Loadline Calibration (LLC) for vDroop control offered in 3 levels only.

This post has been edited by owikh84: May 9 2018, 09:30 PM
neverfap
post May 9 2018, 07:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,147 posts

Joined: Aug 2013


QUOTE(hafiez @ May 9 2018, 06:08 PM)
Haha im trying 5GHz on gaming 3
*
Wow..hardcore
Good luck!!
hafiez
post May 9 2018, 08:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,980 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Mount Chiliad



QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 9 2018, 06:36 PM)
Attached Image
Source: http://www.overclock.net/forum/6-intel-mot...ion-thread.html

AORUS Z370 Gaming 5 (RM891, same tier as ASRock's Fatal1ty Z370 Gaming K6 (RM805) and MSI's Z370 GAMING M5 (RM991).

Z370 Gaming 5 - 8+3 phases, has debug LED, 3x M.2, Wi-Fi
Fatal1ty Z370 Gaming K6 - 6+4 phases, no debug LED, 2x M.2, no Wi-Fi
Z370 Gaming M5 - 8+2 phases, no debug LED, 2x M.2, no Wi-Fi

Gaming 5 is the best value Z370 board with the highest specs among the three.
Also, like other AORUS series it has best RGB illumination among the Z370 boards in the market.

Cons are:
1) Inaccurate voltage reading due to iTE Super I/O chip being used, rather than Nuvoton which is more superior.
2) UEFI BIOS is quite lacking behind other vendors such as ASUS and ASRock.
3) Loadline Calibration (LLC) for vDroop control offered in 3 levels only.
*

yes i do agree on the cons #1,2,3

For the vcore, i set 1.325, but in HWiNFO showing ~1.41v

In cpuz 1.296.

How to verify this yea owikh?

TSowikh84
post May 9 2018, 09:29 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(hafiez @ May 9 2018, 08:02 PM)
yes i do agree on the cons #1,2,3

For the vcore, i set 1.325, but in HWiNFO showing ~1.41v

In cpuz 1.296.

How to verify this yea owikh?
*
Most accurate is by measuring with a calibrated digital multi-meter (DMM).
king99
post May 11 2018, 09:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



Added a fan to my GIGABYTE Ultra-Gaming 2.0 VRM, temps went from 90c to 75++c. Now only dare to push it up.

Now 4.5 GHZ with max load temp of 84c during prime small FFT. This temp should be ok right ? Resit and repaste the Masterair 4 with multiple diff thermal paste also this temp, now on Kyronaught. I guess this cooler cannot <80 oc haha.

This post has been edited by king99: May 11 2018, 09:49 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
TSowikh84
post May 12 2018, 06:03 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(king99 @ May 11 2018, 09:48 PM)
Added a fan to my GIGABYTE Ultra-Gaming 2.0 VRM, temps went from 90c to 75++c. Now only dare to push it up.

Now 4.5 GHZ with max load temp of 84c during prime small FFT. This temp should be ok right ? Resit and repaste the Masterair 4 with multiple diff thermal paste also this temp, now on Kyronaught. I guess this cooler cannot <80 oc haha.

VRM overheat on Z370 Ultra-Gaming 2.0 has also been reported in OC3D's review.

Attached Image

https://overclock3d.net/reviews/cpu_mainboa...ng_2_0_review/7

Ironically, the version 2.0 is supposed to fix the same flaw found on the original release but it seems that it did not happen LOL.

This post has been edited by owikh84: May 12 2018, 08:34 PM
king99
post May 12 2018, 11:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 12 2018, 06:03 PM)
VRM overheat on Z370 Ultra-Gaming 2.0 has also been reported in OC3D's review.

Attached Image

https://overclock3d.net/reviews/cpu_mainboa...ng_2_0_review/7

Ironically, the version 2.0 is supposed to fix the same flaw found on the original release but it seems that it did not happen LOL.
*
Yeah I saw the video. Sadly I got it before the new video is out. Got it last month.

Well at least I am not aiming for 5.0 Ghz for now. 77c for the VRM seems acceptable for my case I think.





This post has been edited by king99: May 13 2018, 12:01 AM
Witchblade
post May 18 2018, 04:27 PM

We are Biker
******
Senior Member
1,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: inside toilet bowl



Guys.. My Asrock z170 pro 4 already dead. How to repair or claim warantry. Any other good mobo to oc es proc?
TSowikh84
post May 18 2018, 05:03 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(Witchblade @ May 18 2018, 04:27 PM)
Guys.. My Asrock z170 pro 4 already dead. How to repair or claim warantry. Any other good mobo to oc es proc?
*
If warranty is still valid (3 years from ASRock) I don't see why not sending for RMA.
Your second question is too general without specifying actual model of the proc etc.
king99
post May 23 2018, 01:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



Hmm, just wondering if this is a software bug or really hardware issue.

When I stressing PRIME 95, sometime HWinfo shows the vrm temps will show the max recorded temperature of 115c when I am away.

But when I stare at the reading at full load it reads 78c to 80c and never go pass 90c.

Sometimes I see unrealistic reading such as 2c Motherboard temps and negative reading.


TSowikh84
post May 23 2018, 10:47 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(king99 @ May 23 2018, 01:53 PM)
Hmm, just wondering if this is a software bug or really hardware issue.

When I stressing PRIME 95, sometime HWinfo shows the vrm temps will show the max recorded temperature of 115c when I am away.

But when I stare at the reading at full load it reads 78c to 80c and never go pass 90c.

Sometimes I see unrealistic reading such as 2c Motherboard temps and negative reading.
*
I suspect because of the iTE super I/O chip being used on the GIGABYTE boards.
This IC is reportedly not as accurate as the Nuvoton NCT.
king99
post May 26 2018, 02:59 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 23 2018, 10:47 PM)
I suspect because of the iTE super I/O chip being used on the GIGABYTE boards.
This IC is reportedly not as accurate as the Nuvoton NCT.
*
Oh i see.

Btw, I tried putting a fan on the back of my motherboard to cool the rear VRM and CPU...to my surprise.....VRM dropped by 7c and CPU by 1c. Never expected this result.

I read most ppl say 1.4 V is the max safe for a Coffee Lake. Just want to clarify is that the one set in BIOS or the one displayed in CPU-Z/Core temp.

In BIOS I set 1.320 for 4.7GHZ, but in CPU-Z/Core temp only show 1.25 average when full load. So...the 1.4V limit is in the bios or in Windows ?

Thanks.
TSowikh84
post May 26 2018, 06:28 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(king99 @ May 26 2018, 02:59 PM)
Oh i see.

Btw, I tried putting a fan on the back of my motherboard to cool the rear VRM and CPU...to my surprise.....VRM dropped by 7c and CPU by 1c. Never expected  this result.

I read most ppl say 1.4 V is the max safe for a Coffee Lake. Just want to clarify is that the one set in BIOS or the one displayed in CPU-Z/Core temp.

In BIOS I set 1.320 for 4.7GHZ, but in CPU-Z/Core temp only show 1.25 average when full load. So...the 1.4V limit is in the bios or in Windows ?

Thanks.
*

Good job in reducing the VRM temp bro, 7c is a huge figure.
I was wondering why GIGABYTE engineers are not able to fix this overheat issue on a revised board.

There's no safe voltage when it comes to OC but I'd recommend to stay below 1.5V under air/water and under 100C. Intel recommended max vCore is 1.52v:
Attached Image

Source: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/pro...heet-vol-1.html

Keyed-in value inside the UEFI is just a reading with no LLC affecting vDroop/vDrop has been taken into the account. So you can rely on the OS-based monitoring software such as HWiNFO64, CPU-Z etc, they will give you accurate voltage reading.
king99
post May 28 2018, 07:28 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



Found a buyer for my Ultra Gaming 2.0, he is gonna use it for a non-k processor which ia suitable.

Any motherboard can recommend ? Budget around 1.2k. Eying the Gaming 7 but reports on the vrm temps is like gambling.

Some say good vrm never pass 60c. Some 100+c....
TSowikh84
post May 28 2018, 02:58 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(king99 @ May 28 2018, 07:28 AM)
Found a buyer for my Ultra Gaming 2.0, he is gonna use it for a non-k processor which ia suitable.

Any motherboard can recommend ? Budget around 1.2k. Eying the Gaming 7 but reports on the vrm temps is like gambling.

Some say good vrm never pass 60c. Some 100+c....
*
With your budget, I think you can consider picking up either ROG Maximus X Hero or ASRock Z370 Taichi.
Wait till June 1st for waived GST. biggrin.gif

56 Pages « < 26 27 28 29 30 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0296sec    0.44    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 03:01 AM