Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Personal Financial Management, Are you always lacking $$$$?

views
     
SUSjasonhanjk
post Feb 23 2009, 02:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


Money is just an idea, it was never real.
SUSjasonhanjk
post Feb 25 2009, 02:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(Syd G @ Feb 25 2009, 02:19 PM)
wa.. lots of posts missing
*
The one from Jason, I had not completed reading.
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 1 2009, 04:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


There are people out there who are really afraid, they cling to their money as if it's real.
Security is everything. They don't see the freedom.

Back to sleep.

This post has been edited by jasonhanjk: Mar 1 2009, 09:23 PM
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 2 2009, 05:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(Andrew Lim @ Mar 2 2009, 08:46 AM)
I wouldn't say clinging on to money is necessarily wrong. Better than those who purchase frivolous things. As they say, a bird in hand is worth two in the bush.

Anyway most people who do investment also invest in things they think are safe - properties, unit trusts, etc. So it's only a lesser degree of laziness.
In this economic climate, I don't really blame them. The "reality" of money isn't worth the paper it's printed on, but rather the potential things it can be exchanged for.

Anyway those people who do investment, are also trying to get more of this "unreal" stuff.  laugh.gif
*
I am using those "unreal" stuff to hang infront of those who still believe those are real.
Or exchange with something that is tangible. laugh.gif

For those who still think having a safe secure job is smart and investing is risky, they are just the opposite of us. I still find them everywhere including here.
Had argue with them until I got fedup and leave. Which I should have done earlier.
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 3 2009, 08:56 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(Andrew Lim @ Mar 2 2009, 10:14 PM)
My Dad told me an unfortunate story of a relative of ours. Was earning 45,000 SGD per month because he was working for some GIC company in Singapore. Even got 8 months bonus.

He was a heavy property investor, bought many properties, but not enough cash savings. He figured his high salary would last for a long time, and would be able to make all the payments.

But then the financial crisis happened. He got a paycut and now he's earning only 11k, still a lot to most of us, but because he overstretched many things, he can't afford to make payments, and housing prices in Singapore plummeted, he had to sell off properties at a loss.

So... I guess the moral of the story is - investment is good, but don't go overboard.
*
I only see a failed investor who speculate for capital gains.

There are 6 basic steps to become a succesful RE investor.
You should ask more details of why he failed instead of believing it outright.
1 or 2 of the steps are missing will make the whole deal go bad.


Added on March 3, 2009, 9:13 am
QUOTE(jasontoh @ Mar 2 2009, 11:15 PM)
That's why I never really encourage property investment. One of the reason being we never know whether recession will hit us or our tenant. If it happens, who is going to pay for the loan? Another thing being I'm not that familiar with property investment. I believe if your relative hedge on stocks, hence he will not need to sell off property at loss. Anyway, it's been an illusion to almost everyone that I know that property investment will earn more as they thought that the price of property will not collapse. I always believe in one thing....what goes up will eventually come down. So......I will only invest in equity, but not property.
Just my 2 cents
*
Tenants will come and go. It will always happen.
If everyone you know believes property price would not collapse, it is advise that you go to an environment where people think differently about property prices. Birds of a feather flock together.

This post has been edited by jasonhanjk: Mar 3 2009, 09:13 AM
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 3 2009, 05:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(Pai @ Mar 3 2009, 05:39 PM)
Hehehe, like phoeni, I gave up reasoning to you as well. Another man's meat could be another's poison. wink.gif
*
I agree. Just let them be.
It's easier to change ourself than to change others.
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 4 2009, 09:55 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(aichiban @ Mar 4 2009, 05:03 AM)
While discussion is nice
but the several pages invasion is not very nice
*
Just watch and you'll see. It's like 2 chess players leading the third one.
The third have potential but is he willing to take the path?
Is he willing to let go the doubts and accept the fact of macro-economics and micro-economics.
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 4 2009, 11:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(aichiban @ Mar 4 2009, 11:52 AM)
he's playing checkers and he seems comfortable with it
u can win medals too in checkers
so let him be

chessers have chesser thread
checkerers have checkers thread

this is an entire different thread
*
I believe the problem started when checkers say something chesser don't like in a board game thread. sweat.gif
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 5 2009, 10:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


The truth is, subprime have little affect on housing / rental price in other parts of the world.

This post has been edited by jasonhanjk: Mar 5 2009, 10:36 PM
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 5 2009, 11:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(jasontoh @ Mar 5 2009, 11:18 PM)
The truth is....the aftershock of subprime has a lot to do with the housing/rental price in most parts of the world.
*
Both of our statement are correct.
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 25 2009, 09:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


There are 2 types of debt, good debt and bad debt.
Most people have only bad debts and that makes them poorer by the day.

If you want to be rich, expand your means but learn to delay gratification.
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 26 2009, 12:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 25 2009, 10:56 PM)
Agree... Good debt is necessary for everyone. I don't think the richest man in the world is free from debt. The more important thing is that he is able to earn a lot of money from his debt...
*
The poor only knows 1 type of debt and they try not to have any. blush.gif
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 28 2009, 12:17 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 27 2009, 09:03 PM)
Agree. That's why only 10 % of the world population are rich people...
*
The correct statement would be:
"10% of the population control 90% of the world's wealth."
SUSjasonhanjk
post Mar 28 2009, 10:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(lcl832002 @ Mar 28 2009, 12:30 AM)
You say like that also... smile.gif
*
Hehe... rclxms.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0475sec    0.43    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 08:08 AM