puji mak kebijaksanaan PM kita ya suci, mulia, dan bersih!
Rahman: 'Safer' if funds in Najib's account News
Rahman: 'Safer' if funds in Najib's account News
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,715 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: KL |
puji mak kebijaksanaan PM kita ya suci, mulia, dan bersih!
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,351 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
Spinnning & lying until rakyat all pening kepala
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
363 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:01 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:01 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Aug 2013 |
UMno members agreed
Apparently ur DPM doesnt know about it which led to his sacking Bodo |
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
252 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
otak dekat lutut.
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
181 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
deposit rm2.6bill into own personal account but his former DPM/Deputy President of umno didn't even know who, where or what the money for? for god sake no one knows about it?……what BS is tis?
This post has been edited by geelim77: Aug 5 2015, 11:13 AM |
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
363 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
I wonder if he knew beforehand.
Probably not. |
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,116 posts Joined: Jun 2014 From: CatCity, Sarawak |
might as well they all empty their bank account and 'donate' to najib for safe keeping. super safe when you got the prime minister taking care of your money
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:03 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
186 posts Joined: Aug 2007 |
sudah nampak god willing in the paragraph. nice sript u got
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:03 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
279 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: Subang Jaya SS15 |
i think in my bank safer too
and which billionaire "donate" the money to his bank account? |
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
686 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(joe_mamak @ Aug 5 2015, 10:50 AM) http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2015...sident-account/ He said. As if everyone agree to put the money thereThe Star August 4, 2015 Rahman: 'Safer' if funds in Najib's account by d.kanyakumari AND hanis zainal Rahman Rahman PETALING JAYA: Umno members are agreeable with the practice of political donations being channeled into the party president's personal account. Supreme council member Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan said in the past, donations were distributed into trustee accounts, which led to a lot of complications. "When Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad wanted to hand over the party assets to Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, he faced a hard time as proxy members did not declare the funds as belonging to the party. "Some members who were going through divorce faced situations where their spouses declared that the asset did not belong to Umno," he said in an interview over TV1 on Tuesday. Rahman said he and fellow party members felt more confident with the donations being placed in the president's account as it was safer there. "In fact it is the responsibility of the party president to find funds for party activities," he said adding that he was thankful of Umno president Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak's effort to find money to sustain the party's "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)" activities. Asked on his opinion about the statement by the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission that Najib was innocent on the charges of stealing the people's money through the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), Rahman said he was relieved. "Why would I not be happy if my president has been proven innocent. "In fact, if he had committed such an offence, God forbid, there is no need for Clare Brown or Wall Street Journal (WSJ) because Umno members themselves would expose the issue," he said. Rahman, the Urban Wellbeing, Housing and Local Government Minister, said it was a noble act by donors who did not impose conditions. "On previous occasions where money was channeled to certain quarters, they were subjected to conditions and that made the arrangements illegal. However, those who donated money to Umno were well wishers. "It is the same as us giving money to Palestinians and Gaza because we believe in the cause," he added. Rahman said he hoped for a transparent way in dealing with political donations in future general elections. "All political parties should acknowledge the call of netizens for the reform of political funding," he said. On the PetroSaudi and 1MDB issue, Rahman said the public should only focus on how much money came in return from the agreement. "We invested USD$1.9bil and got back USD2.38bil so that means we made money for the country and that is all that matters. "Matters like Jho Low and Paris Hilton in a champagne party should not even be made an issue," he said. Rahman said netizens should be rational when it comes to such sensitive matters. -------------------------------------------- Any UMNO members care to comment on the bolded part? Where were u fuckers when this issue comes to surface? Why dont answer it then like u answer it now quickly? |
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:06 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
56 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(joe_mamak @ Aug 5 2015, 10:50 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « PETALING JAYA: Umno members are agreeable with the practice of political donations being channeled into the party president's personal account. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « - See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysi...h.RtN5PWY4.dpuf This post has been edited by rolling2014: Aug 5 2015, 11:06 AM |
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:07 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
50 posts Joined: May 2013 |
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:07 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
113 posts Joined: Apr 2011 From: Seven Nation |
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,725 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: In /hardware/ |
http://www.malaysia-today.net/why-malaysia...-cost-billions/
Raja Petra Kamarudin If the RM200,000 per candidate limit for the parliament seats and the RM100,000 per candidate limit for the state seats is strictly observed, as the law requires, this would mean, first of all, that Barisan Nasional would not be able to win the elections. This is because ‘tanpa minyak jentera tak jalan’. Translated into English that would mean ‘without fuel the machinery will not move’. Hence without money no one is going to do any work for the party. That, unfortunately, is the Umno and Barisan Nasional culture. There are no volunteers. You pay to get people to work. In fact, I have personally seen in some places in Terengganu where the PAS markas received its packed lunch by 1.00pm while by 3.00pm the Umno markas still did not receive any food deliveries. So the Umno machinery walked over to the PAS markas to join them for lunch and the PAS markas was crowded with workers from both political parties while the Umno markas was totally deserted. Is it not the saying that an army fights on its stomach? So, if there is no food, drinks, fuel allowance (petrol chits), T-shirts, caps, cash, and so on, then no one is going to fight for you. Then there is the cost to put up the flags, posters and banners, which are paid based on per unit. And if it rains that night then they need to put them up again the next morning and that would involve another payment. So, yes, the parliament candidates personally spend RM200,000 for the election while the state candidates spend RM100,000. This is the official statement of accounts that is submitted to the Election Commission within six months after the election (if not then the candidate would be disqualified). But that RM200,000 or RM100,000 is what the candidate personally spends and is what is officially declared in the accounts and submitted to the EC. That does not include what the party spends. Technically, it is a grey area and the EC is fully aware of the violation of the election law and has known so for decades. But as long as the candidates submit their accounts within six months and the accounts show that the limit has not been exceeded then well and fine. But what about all that ‘lain-lain’? The party flags and banners? The candidates’ election posters? The T-shirts and caps? The RM100 million worth of mineral water with the party logo printed on them? The packed food and petrol chits for the thousands of workers? The rental for vehicles to ferry the voters to the polling stations on polling day, with the drivers’ allowance thrown in? Then there is the cost to set up the markas plus the stage for the nightly ceramah with PA system, chairs to be rented, and so on, thrown in. You also need tents and canvas in case it rains. The logistics is crazy and the cost of all that even crazier. And when you detail this and total up the cost, RM1 billion is nothing. It hardly covers the logistics on the ground and then there is still the TV, radio, and newspaper advertising plus billboards and more to pay for. Hell, the election manifesto alone in 2013 cost Barisan Nasional almost RM100 million to print and distribute all over Malaysia. That means the cost of the election manifesto alone cost more than the RM95 million maximum limit that is allowed under the law for the 222 parliament and 505 state seats. In short, kalau kira halus (if audited with a fine-tooth comb) all Barisan Nasional’s candidates should be disqualified, as would the opposition candidates as well because the opposition, too, exceeded the limit. The EC does not know this? Of course the EC does. The EC has known for a long, long time. And the EC knows that both sides of the political divide are equally guilty. So the opposition cannot complain because it, too, broke the election law although maybe not as bad as Barisan Nasional. Nevertheless, the opposition exceeded the limit as well. Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad knows how much a general election costs. And Dr Mahathir knows that Barisan Nasional needs to spend more than a billion each election and that the cost goes up every election as the number of voters double and as it becomes harder and harder for Barisan Nasional to win the election unless they pour money into the election campaign. Let me put it this way, never mind whoever that Prime Minister is. Even if Dr Mahathir himself were still Prime Minister today he would need to spend RM1.5 billion to RM2.5 billion if he wants Umno and Barisan Nasional to win the election, even with just a simple majority minus the two-thirds majority. Using RM2.5 billion in a single election would breach existing rules governing limits on poll spending, said Dr Mahathir today. “If Umno needs RM2.5 billion for elections, it violates the election laws and regulations,” he said. Actually, spending RM1.5 billion on an election like what Dr Mahathir used to do during his time is also a breach of election rules because the amount should not have exceeded RM95 million. So whether Najib spent RM2.5 billion while Dr Mahathir spent ‘merely’ RM1.5 billion makes no difference. Both are equally wrong. Well, at least now Dr Mahathir admits that he is aware that the RM2.6 billion that was alleged to have been banked into Najib’s personal bank account was to finance the 2013 general election. Actually, Dr Mahathir was aware from the very beginning and that is why he lamented that Najib won the 2013 general election because he spent so much money. If Najib had spent just RM1.5 billion like what Dr Mahathir did during his time, instead of RM2.6 billion, would that have been okay? Does not RM1.5 billion still exceed the RM95 million allowed under the law? Dr Mahathir also admitted that Umno’s assets are held in trust under the names of three nominees that include the party president. However, said Dr Mahathir, the funds were kept in a designated bank account controlled by three people. (The issue here seems to be ‘controlled by three people’ as opposed to ‘controlled by one person’). “Not a single sen from donations for elections were deposited into my account. I am prepared for all my personal accounts for 22 years to be vetted by impartial parties to verify if my claim is true or otherwise,” Dr Mahathir said in his blog posting today. Yes, Dr Mahathir is right on that one. Trustees were used who in turn used nominees and proxies who in turn had sub-nominees and sub-proxies. And this is why RM100 billion or maybe even more of Umno’s wealth has disappeared. Anwar Ibrahim claimed that a certain ‘trustee’ walked away with RM60 billion while another sapu RM40 billion. That is not what I say. That is what Anwar said. Maybe Anwar can repeat that allegation for the benefit of those who may have forgotten that he said that back in 1998. Or is Anwar now going to deny he said that? |
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:08 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
43 posts Joined: Nov 2009 |
Kalau PM tiba2 dipanggil mengadap Allah tu duit donation saper punya?
umno pun tak tahu ada donation. lepas 1 bulan baru jumpa jawapan. |
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:09 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
all this penjilat comment can give other people cancer
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:09 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
13 posts Joined: Jul 2014 |
So bodoh jilat...still task to serve Rakyat.. makan najis lor this time
|
|
|
Aug 5 2015, 11:10 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
194 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
mari kita menabung dalam akaun najib
|
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0200sec
0.28
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 04:27 PM |