the number of sheeps commenting for the sake of bashing is amusing here.

*munching popcorns*

at this part is where this "credible witness" by Hadi Awang coming in, brah.

someone that had the reputation and credible to certified the proof is untampered and the right proof to be used in wsj allegation.

i'm just clarifying the part of witness as quoted from hadi, though.

cuz ya know, most of replies in this thread went apeshit as they cannot comprehend simple quote from hadi awang....and simply bashing which eventually totally derailed the thread.

but, even though najib did not sue wsj first, and trial and subsequent analysis of evidence cannot take place in msia, as long as there were reputable and independent investigation body confirmed and certified the documents is legit and untampered....najib is gone liao. even tho hes staying, number of support is greatly reduced, party fund is starved, and he is out of resource to keep his power longer..