(news) WSJ must produce four witnesses, Hadi says, PAS = PAS Also Songlap???
|
|
 Jul 7 2015, 08:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
5,753 posts Joined: Feb 2013  
|
QUOTE(silvertoes @ Jul 7 2015, 08:27 PM) so in order to prosecute PM n send him to jail for this crime he allegedly did, we do not need credible witnesses and concrete proof?? concrete proof is provided by wsj. all the docs are there for all to seereport from WSJ is enough??  http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysi...najibs-accounts |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 09:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
5,753 posts Joined: Feb 2013
|
QUOTE(silvertoes @ Jul 7 2015, 09:02 PM) no need credible people to back it up? all documents already there to make substantiated proof. why need credible people? and what do you mean by credible people? rosmah? documents once confirmed it is untampered with is good enough.yes they can.. u go learn the real hudud law from real clerics or PAS members instead of malaymail and wiki  This post has been edited by robertchoo: Jul 7 2015, 09:19 PM |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 09:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
5,753 posts Joined: Feb 2013
|
QUOTE(vanpersie91 @ Jul 7 2015, 09:19 PM) at this part is where this "credible witness" by Hadi Awang coming in, brah. sure. but for that to happen najib must sue wsj first. and the trial and subsequent analysis of the evidence cannot take place in msia.someone that had the reputation and credible to certified the proof is untampered and the right proof to be used in wsj allegation. |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: |  0.0198sec
 0.52
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 05:09 PM |
Quote