Clicking the picture links you to flickr which tells you everything

found this on GS, very good price i would say

https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=3657910&hl=gh3

show an example maybe?

What aperture are you using when panning? The DOF should be enough to cover a lot of distance I guess?

You don't have the care about the fence if you pan correctly, the slow shutter speed with blur out the fence with movement. the smaller sensor of m4/3 makes at hard to blur out obstacles, but at the same time provide more DOF so that the AF system is more forgiving.

my suggestion is turn off AF, use MF, use smaller aperture, and pan. a proper pan will render everything other than the car blurry.

actually you don't have to modify. on my em10, i used the rf603 from my previous canon system. just mount it on hotshoe leaving the last 2 pins out and it will work. not sure if nikon version works the same way though

which part of it that you feel not satisfied?

not sharp comparing to x100s something to do with the lens i guess? because last time when i use the olympus 12-40mm on my em10 the sharpness is crazy so i don't think it's the limitation of sensor.

yeah for the other 3 points I can agree with you. I don't think the em5 mkii improved a lot in terms of dynamic range and high ISO, if you really need these 2 you have to go for bigger sensor.

A7 II should be around 5k? best value would either be a7 ii or d750. 6D isn't really worth to get because of the weaker features compared to newer FF cameras although the high ISO is still good.

haha u need donations

When it was new the only competitor was the d600 but the d600 suffered from dust issues so the 6d had advantage. but nowadays as FF sensor improves and you have mirrorless like A7 series, the 6D became a weak camera in comparison.

the sensor from both sony and nikon have a lot better dynamic range but suffers a little in high iso compared to 6d, for me dynamic range matters more than high iso most of the time. and canon was once the leader of good video quality but now it was so far behind compared to sony/ panasonic. lastly the AF system which was really basic and dated.

This post has been edited by mingyuyu: Sep 20 2015, 12:00 PM

your pricing is alright to me, so is your topic. it's just that em5 is not that demanded by people now so you have no choice but to wait until the right buyer appears

m4/3 cameras generally are quite hard to sell as 2nd unit compared to dslrs/ sony mirrorless.

just get extension tubes/ raynox. they are more than enough for beginners

u can get the lower magnification version anyways. and to be honest for flowers kit lens is more than enough.

anyone here knows how much the panasonic fz1000 roughly costs?

i went from dslr to m4/3 to dslr and i think i know what you mean

time to unleash GAS

Anyone here tried lx100 before? Thinking to jump back into the m43 ship as my nikon is too heavy to carry around when cycling

nope, the price for that lens increased so much basically if i were to buy that lens used i can buy a new lx100.

as a ex owner of 12-40mm i can agree with this, i shoot at f2.8 90% of the time using that lens

changed system, i realized i need more than 24-80mm of focal length since I shoot a lot of landscape + macro. Got myself a UWA and telephoto macro lens afterwards.

but still it's a really good lens and for the price there is no other better choice.