Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Nikon D40/D40X, finally, dslr for noobs

views
     
sinister
post Jan 5 2007, 08:14 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
wat u mean flaws? it looks ok to me..
sinister
post Jan 5 2007, 12:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
same here... i juz couldn't live without d lcd at d top of d camera.. everything looking at d back LCD.. looks a bit weird for me..
sinister
post Jan 5 2007, 02:24 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(wkcheang @ Jan 5 2007, 01:42 PM)
For those who are used to other SLR's, the lack of a top LCD will be a major issue, it really makes adjusting settings much faster.

However, for those who are moving up to SLR's from compacts and bridge cams, they won't miss the top LCD as they would be more accustomed to using the main LCD for settings.

To each, his own.

hands.gif
*
yeah i know... wat to do.. can't teach an old dog new tricks mah... biggrin.gif

But i like d wallpaper on d D40 though biggrin.gif

sinister
post Jan 7 2007, 01:34 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jan 6 2007, 09:15 PM)
hehe. i know my usage........ wink.gif

even my S7000 last me nearly 2 years, since photography is just a hobby i don't intend to buy many lense.

my type of photography is usually landscape / scenery so sticking to a lens or 2 will be fine until later on when i have more $$$$ allocated to spend on lenses. smile.gif
*
He he he... den u get more $$$$$ u buy D200... biggrin.gif

sinister
post Jan 8 2007, 11:26 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
shinchan.. wah 10-24mm... dats gonna kill his bank balance
sinister
post Jan 30 2007, 08:04 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Jan 29 2007, 02:48 PM)
i think no need to go la
just start shooting urself

next to invest

prime lens, telephoto lens and macro brows.gif
*
I'm suprised u didn't recommend him to buy d 600mm prime lens cry.gif

sinister
post Feb 10 2007, 10:07 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(clemong_888 @ Feb 9 2007, 06:40 PM)
warranty warranty. there's also tax issues which makes it more expensive smile.gif
*
I thought camera was 0% tax..
sinister
post Feb 11 2007, 09:40 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
330 for 1 charge? i thought ard 1k..
sinister
post Feb 14 2007, 01:38 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Evirober @ Feb 11 2007, 10:05 PM)
sinister: what battery are u using that can take 1k shots ??? hehehehehe

littlegreen: Dude u can still set it to Auto Mode even when you upgrade your lens bro. Its not meant for kit lens only .. = ))
*
It's call D70s biggrin.gif

sinister
post Feb 15 2007, 10:53 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(littlegreen @ Feb 15 2007, 12:22 AM)
ic.. d40 cant do this rite... and d40 need afs or afi lens rite to do ,,,autofocus
can d40 fit the 300mm lens and other lens more than 300 and able to used with manual atleast..
*
not sure if 300mm has AFS support.. need to check at nikon
sinister
post Mar 7 2007, 12:50 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Mar 7 2007, 12:02 PM)
AF-S 105mm VR F/2.8

macro ~ brows.gif
Rm2650
*
I rather get d Tamron 90mm one.. biggrin.gif
sinister
post Mar 7 2007, 02:32 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
hmmm.. didn't consider dat
sinister
post Mar 9 2007, 09:35 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
go for D40.. or if u can get D50
sinister
post Mar 9 2007, 09:47 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
here...

this guy uses D50.. u can ask him..

d50 blogger
sinister
post Mar 11 2007, 10:09 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Mar 7 2007, 01:35 PM)
if u ve tried the focusing speed on 105
u wont look at sp90 already
*
I thought it was for macro.. why need speed? sweat.gif
sinister
post Mar 12 2007, 08:26 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(maRx @ Mar 12 2007, 08:12 AM)
guys, i really recommend you to save more and get the sb-600.. the sb-400 is pretty useless.
*
whilst ur at it.. save for SB800 biggrin.gif
sinister
post Mar 12 2007, 03:22 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(harrychoo @ Mar 12 2007, 08:31 AM)
who dunno mother is woman  laugh.gif

i wish i have 18-200mm VR also  drool.gif
*
how much is d 18-200mm VR by d way?
sinister
post Mar 12 2007, 08:54 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Mar 12 2007, 03:41 PM)
Rm2.9K lol
*
hmm... need to add to things to buy
sinister
post Mar 13 2007, 03:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Mar 13 2007, 02:54 PM)
get the 55-200mm VR version
*
Poison at work rclxub.gif
sinister
post Mar 14 2007, 01:14 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
963 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(polkiuj @ Mar 13 2007, 08:30 PM)
For long zoom lenses u really should look into VR. It'll help temendously.


Added on March 13, 2007, 8:36 pmFor long zoom lenses u really should look into VR. It'll help temendously.

"Forget the old non-VR 55-200mm. This 55-200mm VR lens costs little more, and VR makes a huge difference with teles." -kenrockwell.com-
*
Does 80-200mm f2.8 got VR?

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0190sec    1.35    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 09:00 AM