QUOTE(wlcling @ Aug 11 2007, 11:06 PM)
wow... hero bashing d40 in d40 thread...
but anyway isn't the d40 differently priced than the 350d anyway...

sorry if you got me wrong, my objective is not to bash D40/D40x.. just sharing my experience, if you dont like.. then dont read, simple as that right?
Yes, the 350D is more expensive than the D40, but its the same price as D40x i believe.
Cheers

Added on August 11, 2007, 11:35 pmQUOTE(Gadget_Freak @ Aug 11 2007, 10:14 PM)
1st : Both 350D and D40 have tiny bodies, u are right but the grip in D40 is much more better than 350D unless u really want a BG to help u in portrait orientation, then i said 350D win. Holding a 350D whole day without BG will cramp ur hand but not D40.
2nd : 7 focus points vs 3 focus points, i dunno others but for me 3 focus points are enough since i'll recompose anyway. changing focus point is quite time consuming for me if u want to shoot a moment fast, unless there is a camera with touch pad to move the focus point freely or at least something like Sony A100, which the focus point can be change diagonally.
3rd : Agree on Nikon have better flash system but Canon is better for high ISO performance, so depends on what kind of indoor photography u want.
re : 2nd :
you can change the settings in your camera to control the focus points using the up-down-left-right button or the scroll dial. i feel using the buttons are much faster, yes.. 350D also can change diagonally.. and your focus point is at the far end and you wanna change it back to the middle, just press the middle button.
Imagine you're shooting a fashion show, you think models gonna wait for you to recompose?
cheers.
This post has been edited by maRx: Aug 11 2007, 11:35 PM