Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 LYN Nissan X-Trail 2015 Club, Innovative Premium Crossover

views
     
small-jeff
post Jun 22 2015, 11:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,646 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
QUOTE(adriankhoo153 @ Jun 19 2015, 10:33 PM)
Btw, what you guys tint your car? Leather seat sure very hot under sun. I am thinking vkool elite with security 5 mil price at rm2200 or 3m Crystaline 70 for rm1,500
*
bro..how come ur 3M so cheap? i got mine at rm2.2k cry.gif cry.gif

is it the one with 98% HR?
small-jeff
post Jun 22 2015, 11:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,646 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
QUOTE(neo1024 @ Jun 22 2015, 03:24 PM)
yeah weih. give some feedbacks on rides, noise, satisfaction, problems etc etc.
*
here're my 2.5 experience earlier:

1. The audio is pretty bad for a car at this price; or perhaps i'm comparing with the Kia(s) i have

2. The best FC i got was 6.9litre/100km - from Puchong to KL and vice-versa, via MEX - without Eco mode gets 7-8 litre/100km

3. ECO mode really drives like turtle. need to press hard to make it to 110km/h

4. Without ECO, kind of powerful, 80-140km/h with a breeze - after 140 not so powerful, but not struggling

5. Tried the voice command thing, doesnt really work too well.

6. Was reading through the manual, i think a lot of applications are missing - since TC replaced with their own shakehead.gif

7. Suspension not the best in town (i guess), kinda noisy but not really too bumpy. Maybe the tires are too full.

8. Tried using manual shift - just realized it actually has 7 speed sweat.gif since it gets to 140km/h pretty fast, very busy shifting without peddle shift

9. Not too noisy. Engine thinks its a boxer, wind noise starts around 100km/h, somehow bike's sound comes in easily

I had a test drive on the 2.0 too, really feels kind of under power. Once i sat on the 2.5, loved the feeling and power
small-jeff
post Jun 23 2015, 10:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,646 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
Ya.. the engine is indeed loud. I read that its the same engine as teana, maybe they purposely made it louder for vroom vroom feel? Lol
small-jeff
post Jun 26 2015, 05:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,646 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Jun 26 2015, 10:55 AM)
Not a very good comparison article. There's hardly a comparison to begin with.

Some more, any competent reviewer will not get confused between L/100km which is clearly shown on the odometer and km/L figures that they achieved.  laugh.gif
From a casual read, people might get the impression that the reviewer's got pretty close to the claimed figures on the brochures which is incorrect. So what they achieve as 12.3L/100km actually translates to a poor 8.13 km/L. Very far from brochure figures.
*
Normal driving 30% with morning city jam, 70% 110km/hr highway = ~8 litre/100km

If smooth drive at 90km/hr = lowest 6.9 litre/100km

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0173sec    1.26    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 12:29 PM