Any1 can tell me the fC of this car? 1 tank can go how many KM?
Thanks
LYN Mazda 3 Owners/Fans Club V7, Zoom-Zoom w/ Kodo
|
|
 Jun 22 2015, 07:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Aug 2012 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 02:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
QUOTE(KennyKB @ Jun 26 2015, 11:35 PM) 9.0 to 9.5l/100km is considered average but not bad fc. The baseline is 10l/100km. Above that is bad. Below that is ok or good depending on how far below.. Bro, 9-9.5L/100 km for a 2L car is consider quite bad FC eh. The reason is my 2L Turbo car is getting 9-10L/100km. For a skyactiv engine car, I was expecting 6-7L /100km in city drive. Not really interested in highway drive as most cars have good FC on the highway . I am also considering this as my 2nd car. .....hmmmm |
|
|
Nov 23 2015, 09:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
Guys what is thefuel consumption of this car? City driving. Pls give honest answers . Tq
|
|
|
Nov 23 2015, 09:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
QUOTE(avenger242 @ Nov 23 2015, 09:54 PM) Really depends on your driving style... if your pedal always meet the metal... then it wont be good. So the skyactiv thingie nothing to shout about. FC seems very normal. If can get 5-6L /100km city drive then its greatFor myself, 8-10L/100km pure city driving. A city driving whereby i can hardly reach 80km/hr even if i want to LOL. |
|
|
Nov 23 2015, 10:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
QUOTE(toonny @ Nov 23 2015, 10:25 PM) Lol bro.. I am thinking are you joking here? This figure is somehow comparing with the Axia.. Even the City also cannot achieve this FC. Dude go and check the average FC of the 2.5 Camry Hybrid. That is what i call good la.Btw, pure city driving here too.. 20km distance (daily would be 40+ km), from Puchong to TTDI, extremely heavy traffic. crawling with average speed 25km/h, 1 hr drive to reach destination. Each refuel around rm 80, last me for +- 500km.. |
|
|
Nov 23 2015, 11:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
QUOTE(toonny @ Nov 23 2015, 10:39 PM) Great! It's a hybrid. Wondering why you compare that with Mazda 3.. Its a 2.5L ..lol |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26 2015, 12:42 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#7
|
|
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
Guys, whats the best deal for M3 now? Looking at getting one.
|
|
|
Nov 26 2015, 11:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
QUOTE(dares @ Nov 26 2015, 08:29 PM) Its a 2.5L petrol engine that makes less power than a 2.0 Camry ..lol Errr... whr u pluck u figures from? |
|
|
Nov 27 2015, 11:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
QUOTE(dares @ Nov 26 2015, 11:27 PM) u sendiri go Toyota website see. the Hybrid's 2.5l petrol engine makes 160 PS, the 2.0NA Camry makes 167 PS. U shud go n brush up ur knowledge first b4 making urself sound like a moron.Before you go "it makes 205 PS with the Hybrid system", let me just remind you that you are the one who highlighted it is has 2.5l engine when another member said it is a Hybrid powertrain. |
|
|
Nov 27 2015, 01:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Junior Member
304 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
QUOTE(dares @ Nov 27 2015, 12:59 PM) Why don't you enlighten me instead of resorting to insults? Stewpid, its detuned to a lower HP since there is a electric motor to support it. Hybrid is all about saving fuel, surely they will detune the engine to a lower hp to save fuel and put more of the load on the electric motor. Common sense. U want to compare u go and see the old camry 2.5 produce how much HP. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0575sec
 0.92
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 05:29 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.