cant wait!
Terminator: Movies Thread, James Cameron is back
Terminator: Movies Thread, James Cameron is back
|
|
May 22 2009, 12:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
741 posts Joined: May 2006 From: The City Of Petaling Jaya |
cant wait!
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 22 2009, 12:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Land below the wind |
QUOTE(ulwan25 @ May 17 2009, 09:11 AM) it was just a rumor. my speculation= star trek = 5stars out of 10...» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « how the heck you see this film?? 11 days to go! QUOTE(Ilianas_Toy @ May 19 2009, 06:58 PM) And hardcore terminator fans couldnt get by that its not directed by cameron, just look at the imdb board, its ridiculuos, everyones assuming its bad even before they've watched it. james cameron old oredi ...and you know his style in directing la he alwiz used huge budget in all his film... |
|
|
May 22 2009, 02:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,054 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Johor Bahru, Johor |
ok. majority of hardcore t-fans loved the film and gave the film 7 or 8/10. they praised for making a new start for the war, but they didn't like the editing, the sound, the character much.
but so far, this film pwnes T3 (which ALL OF T-FANS HATED IT). so that's a great one on my book. but on rottentomatoes rated at 33%? that was, ridiculous. they was expecting more of those jokes from T3 (u kiddin' me?). why they didn't understand? do we need jokes and humor in a war situations? why? star trek not that good? you're lucky because it was a reboot film. rather than T4, it was a prequel and a sequel combined. as for the waiting, I CAN'T WAIT!!! 28th, please move faster! |
|
|
May 22 2009, 03:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,403 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Johor Bahru |
QUOTE(ulwan25 @ May 22 2009, 02:38 PM) but so far, this film pwnes T3 (which ALL OF T-FANS HATED IT). so that's a great one on my book. but on rottentomatoes rated at 33%? that was, ridiculous. they was expecting more of those jokes from T3 (u kiddin' me?). why they didn't understand? do we need jokes and humor in a war situations? I'm getting ready for this, since this is a prequel and a sequel combined, which Terminator movie should i watch again to fully appreciate T4?why? star trek not that good? you're lucky because it was a reboot film. rather than T4, it was a prequel and a sequel combined. as for the waiting, I CAN'T WAIT!!! 28th, please move faster! T1 and T2? or T2 and T3? or hopefully not T1,2,3?...sighs I think the 27th night tickets are open for booking now....I'm waiting for the 28th one since oledi take leave. THen again, if Star Trek is showing, might as well watch both... This post has been edited by azbro: May 22 2009, 03:15 PM |
|
|
May 22 2009, 03:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,867 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ulwan25 @ May 22 2009, 02:38 PM) ok. majority of hardcore t-fans loved the film and gave the film 7 or 8/10. they praised for making a new start for the war, but they didn't like the editing, the sound, the character much. You really are on a crusade against the critics arent you? What happens if you agree with them when you have actually seen it?but so far, this film pwnes T3 (which ALL OF T-FANS HATED IT). so that's a great one on my book. but on rottentomatoes rated at 33%? that was, ridiculous. they was expecting more of those jokes from T3 (u kiddin' me?). why they didn't understand? do we need jokes and humor in a war situations? why? star trek not that good? you're lucky because it was a reboot film. rather than T4, it was a prequel and a sequel combined. as for the waiting, I CAN'T WAIT!!! 28th, please move faster! And no, not every Terminator fan hates T3. It was skimpy on plot and development (apart from the last act), and good in its action... which is all I'm hearing about the new movie too. I'll be pleased if Salvation is on par with T3. At least that movie has Arnold in it, and any Terminator fan who's worth his salt knows Arnold embodies the very Terminator spirit! And hardcore fans definitely do not download camrips of their beloved franchise. Also, T2 probably had as much humour as T3. |
|
|
May 22 2009, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: KL |
But this is different. Adult John Connor should never EVER utter lines like 'No problemo' (if true) and I just finished the video game on the PS3, if the dialogue is anything like the game, the scriptwriter needs to get shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 22 2009, 05:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,054 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Johor Bahru, Johor |
QUOTE(QuickFire @ May 22 2009, 04:23 PM) You really are on a crusade against the critics arent you? What happens if you agree with them when you have actually seen it? yes, not all t-fans hated that T3. i liked it also And no, not every Terminator fan hates T3. It was skimpy on plot and development (apart from the last act), and good in its action... which is all I'm hearing about the new movie too. I'll be pleased if Salvation is on par with T3. At least that movie has Arnold in it, and any Terminator fan who's worth his salt knows Arnold embodies the very Terminator spirit! And hardcore fans definitely do not download camrips of their beloved franchise. Also, T2 probably had as much humour as T3. i think T2's humor was balanced with it's action element (T3's waaayy stupid ones, it makes the T-X and t-850 looks super dumb). plus, maybe im way to overreact on the critic, so i better zipped my mouth out till it's released chillout, di*kwad.... Added on May 22, 2009, 5:57 pm QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ May 22 2009, 05:12 PM) But this is different. Adult John Connor should never EVER utter lines like 'No problemo' (if true) and I just finished the video game on the PS3, if the dialogue is anything like the game, the scriptwriter needs to get shot. i heard that game got tons of bugs, and wtf? 3hrs of storyline? but im gettin' that stuff anyway. This post has been edited by ulwan25: May 22 2009, 05:57 PM |
|
|
May 22 2009, 07:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,258 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
|
|
|
May 22 2009, 10:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,098 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
32% on Rotten Tomatoes ? I heard someone say its better than Star Trek ? Lol... that probably is something thinking Star Trek "can't be the best movie of the year" (yet).
|
|
|
May 22 2009, 10:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: KL |
I could have taken much shorter were it not for the bugs encountered. I had to start the hardest level (Act 7) three times because of 'hang' and numerous other little bugs where a spider is stuck in the wall and you can't go to the next section without killing ALL robots
|
|
|
May 22 2009, 11:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
634 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Kay Bee |
Rotten Tomatoes is not a site for be-all-end-all when it comes to movie reviews, I don't trust them anymore.
|
|
|
May 23 2009, 03:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,258 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ May 22 2009, 10:28 PM) I could have taken much shorter were it not for the bugs encountered. I had to start the hardest level (Act 7) three times because of 'hang' and numerous other little bugs where a spider is stuck in the wall and you can't go to the next section without killing ALL robots lol..talk about stewpid ai,eh? |
|
|
May 23 2009, 07:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,054 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Johor Bahru, Johor |
QUOTE(defaultname365 @ May 22 2009, 11:25 PM) 32% on Rotten Tomatoes ? I heard someone say its better than Star Trek ? Lol... that probably is something thinking Star Trek "can't be the best movie of the year" (yet). RT was stump on that film. maybe they expect TS to perform more of it. but they forgot one thing= TS is not a reboot |
|
|
|
|
|
May 23 2009, 08:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,867 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Fatimus @ May 22 2009, 11:40 PM) Rotten Tomatoes is not a site for be-all-end-all when it comes to movie reviews, I don't trust them anymore. Its not be-all-end-all, but it is generally indicative of the movie's quality though. More often than not an 80% movie will be much better than a 30% movie. |
|
|
May 23 2009, 11:27 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
Its very upsetting to see film critics who has already set their benchmark, if its not as par as the earlier ones then its complete utter fail, to have morons like ebert who thinks citizen kane or the godfather is better then the rest of the movie nowadays tells you that how much of a pompous ass moron elitist jerk that he and the others are and anyone who agrees with them are no better because they dont have a stand and that they want to join in the bandwagon so that their cool and know it all like the rest of them.
|
|
|
May 23 2009, 12:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,867 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Ebert is a populist. He's one the last critics you can call an elitist.
|
|
|
May 23 2009, 12:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
659 posts Joined: Apr 2007 From: Russia with Love |
watched it, the CGI is awesome, story line so so...typical summer blockbuster
|
|
|
May 23 2009, 01:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,403 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Johor Bahru |
|
|
|
May 23 2009, 04:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,027 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
|
|
|
May 23 2009, 08:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
aarggh, can't wait for the movie
|
| Change to: | 0.0228sec
0.75
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 10:16 PM |