A chairman who never paid his maintenance fee was wrongly elected as chairman. how to remove him?

any guide on what the reasonable fee is paid to MO office, i saw in the account we paid staff salary and agent/MO fee of RM5k each mth...

Can funds from maintenance fees be used for festive and religious events? Eg New Year celebrations and Jade emperor prayers etc? Christmas parties

Hi all,

I have a question related to Strata Management - owner vs developer.

This is an old property, completed before 2013, freehold, walk up with level LG, L1, L2 and L3, but the developer called it Villa style.

Not sure what is in the 1st buyer Sale and Purchase Agreement with developer, but in a SubSale, a search in the land office system PTGs, the assessory parcel listed 2 plots but the keluasan is only 4 meter square. S&P listed 2 parkings which should be 25 meter square, but with 524 units in total, the total parkings in the whole development is less than 2x524=1048 parkings.

Recently, an ex employee of the developer related company told our JMB that the parking is under deed of covenant, which normally used for leasehold property, and meaning that once JMB achieve MC, all parkings are under MC as a common property.

Any experts here can explain to me how this scenario is possible?
Anyone in this forum has experienced similar scenario?
Isn't this scenario will post serious consequences since every subsequent subsale will be selling parkings in S&P which the main parcel does not possess?
What kind of dispute this scenario will create in the future?

Thanks,
Sepilok

Here is the situation at my condo somewhere in Klang Valley. After latest MC election, we got a new treasurer.

1. RM4.5k for repainting a small common room (6 x 5 x 3 meters). The old committee approved it. New treasurer thought the cost was ridiculous. After complaining, the contractor reduced it to RM1k (over 70% lower).

2. Nearly RM70k for a new reserve water tank on ground floor was approved by old MC. This new tank replaced an old one. New treasurer was told to pay the invoice. On inspection, he found two problems:
a. the new tank doesn't look new at all
b. the invoice quoted a tank 7.7 times (in volume) larger than it should be

We can only catch these problems if there is something that the new treasurer needs to pay. Trying to get details on other past expenses is impossible as the Chairman has total control over the MC and property manager. The treasurer is alone and cast as 'troublemaker'.

The same contractor was involved in both cases. I see is a pattern of contractor overcharging and MC approving.

What is our best course of action?