Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Strata act 757

views
     
Hunter_Ho
post Jun 28 2015, 05:38 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
Can i ask two question here.

1.From the act 663 i still can see conflict of interest but cant found in 757 and also called to mpsj to verify.
Mpsj replied no longer act 663 and act 318.

So how we refer back to conflict of interest?

2. If management decided to closed the access system with unreasonable implemented and deny any owners if not follow.
do we have any act to refer and know owner right to entry own premies?.

Or we need to follow whatever implemented term?.

Its services apartment.

Thank you
Hunter_Ho
post Jun 28 2015, 06:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(aurora97 @ Jun 28 2015, 06:01 PM)
1. Quote the section is act 663, maybe i can find the equivalent.

2. What is conflict of interest to you?

3. To answer no.2 question, u may have your owners right over  unit. Your ignoring the fact that common areas fall under the care of the management. My next question would be how is it unreasonably implemented?
*
Thank for the reply.
Sorry again for misunderstood your reply just now.

Since we new to this act 757 and hopefully we are covered owner fund if there is any conflict of interest act or law to protecting owner.

Sorry the quote is here. Thank in advance.
QUOTE
disclosure  of  interest 9.  (1)  A  member  of  the  Committee  having  any  interest  in  any  matter  under discussion  by  the  Committee  shall  disclose  to  the  Committee  the  facts  of  his interest and its nature. (2)    A  disclosure  under  subparagraph  (1)  shall  be  recorded  in  the  minutes of  the  Committee  and,  after  the  disclosure,  the  member  having  an  interest  in the  matter  shall  not  take  part  nor  be  present  in  any  deliberation  or  decision of  the  Committee.



For the access its about access card implemented with fee to renew the card and also forced to pay the admin fee, otherwise will deny any entry or even exit.

How can we refer to law or act to counter this?.
else i just stand outside of my apartment?
is there any law protection to enter my own premies?.

Thank you.

Maybe we need lawyer for this issue and i need to know which law or act i can refer to.

This post has been edited by Hunter_Ho: Jun 28 2015, 06:52 PM
Hunter_Ho
post Jun 28 2015, 11:02 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
About the disclosure is related to other matter already happened with our jmc/mc.

But i want to know its replaced by act 757 or left out from act 663?.

Thank you
Hunter_Ho
post Jun 29 2015, 08:42 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(aurora97 @ Jun 28 2015, 11:45 PM)
I can't take a partisan view on this issue.

I will advise you based on the facts you have presented and what I can sight in the Act 757 itself (which supersede Act 663).

Other than that, u will need to do your own research and fight your own battles.

I will write more when i get to office.
*
Wait for reply and thanks

Thank you.

This post has been edited by Hunter_Ho: Jun 29 2015, 09:39 AM
Hunter_Ho
post Jun 30 2015, 07:06 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
About the questions for Jmc/Mc,

Can they replace anyone as they liked and even chairman, secretary, treasurer also?.

And without any votes or Egm?.

If they want to remove committee due to not same voice, do they need to have Cob approval letter or just issue termination letter to the member without any legal approved? .

Thank you

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0155sec    0.40    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 08:12 AM