tagging this for future refrenece, i just voluntarily join the JMC.
Strata act 757
Strata act 757
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 08:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
tagging this for future refrenece, i just voluntarily join the JMC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 10:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
aurora97, thanks, is there any books/hard copy for this? easier to make refrence. previous MC, might look to have missapproprate with some funds. honestly this is cheap apartment, where many issue - parking, roof leakage, lax security etc.
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 11:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
thanks again aurora for the pdf files. problem with my place is its consist of 1.2k unit low rise apt n town house. every agm also like less than 50 ppl attend. more of peoples mentality here
i look at the collection, doesnt seem bad for previous yrs. but not sure in the near future, the devoleper just release their holding unit which is 300 units. thats about 25% of the contribution which is paid ontime. |
|
|
Aug 28 2015, 08:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
Hi all, just has my first meeting as a comittee now, i miss the first one last month. some info about our apartment currently the management agent has been there for last 4-5 yrs. i am having a situation that seem like our new chairman, secretary and the management agent trying to collude to milk the fund.
1st previous certain mc member currently been investigated by sprm(info from chairman n MA) 2nd but currently MA say/claim knowledge that they are aware of that but not involved (i believe there also collude previously) 3rd the current chairman and secretary, was previously suspended due to fraud/extortion (there are just commitee previously). egm was held to dispelled them, ended with suspension only last year. 4th when the egm held previously, it seems like tha MA ia agreeable that the 2 are doing wrong/trying to convict. 5th, but now the table seem to turn around that MA and the two is very good and kamcheng, come to agreement that previous MC did alot of wrongdoing instead and they are clean. 6th current MA not very keen to furnish all infomation that we need. such as contract agreements, MOM for past years, account informations, expenditure breakdowns. 7th i got into heated argument with MA that implying new MC is accusing them, when we requested them to furnish documents we needed. 8th chairman and secretary is defending the MA. (seems like foe turn friends) 9th parking issue, they blame the previous MC on current woes. 10th trying to propose to spend money as much as possible. while the funds are depleting. 11th all staff like caacount lerks, technicians are all under their payroll. might sabotage the accounting as well later on. i m trying to obtain all document such as contract agreement for MA, Securities, Cleaning Services, upgrading work,etc but MA decided not to relay the document to us. now the chairman and secretary warn us that we got no right to obtain the document and only should review when we started to elected, is there such rule? what are the avenue that we can do in such situation. currently only the treasurer are siding with us where she will not sign off all upgrading payment work in the future. what do you all think? All can a resident request documents like contracts and MOM for meeting to be review? or this information are PNC. many thanks |
|
|
Aug 28 2015, 10:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
cherroy,
understand and now i m one of the MC, the problem MA is not cooperating with us under the instruction of Chairman and secretary. so they dont want to furnish us past and current contracts. we want to audit and check some of the expenditure. some work done is not completed but large sum already paid out. current MA contracts already lapse, running month to monthly basis. and as i said previous egm this chairman and secretary has been suspended before. they nominated themselve into MC and no one nomination for others. we are selected from the floor during agm to fill the quota of mc - 7 person. now new MC members are requesting for the documents, but they are not allowing us to review. best part some times this 3 parties speak in their native language during meeting, so we dont understand. i believe he is teaching the ma how to taichi our questions. QUOTE(cherroy @ Aug 28 2015, 09:07 AM) To be fair, MA has not obligation to answer to everyone, they answer to the MC appointed them. As what if everyone also want to view the document, then it would be troublesome. It is better one off being revealed during EGM, although it may or may not pnc. MA should be listening to what MC want them to do, not everyone. The one ultimate or important to do is to convene an EGM and reshuffle the MC, and elected yourself into it, and form a new team of MC, by then you have all the right to assess and review all the contracts made. There is no point trying to find fault in the contracts or whatever at the moment. Also no point to 'fight" with MA in term of seeking those document as well, instead it is best interest try to "be friend" with them to get the transition of management more smoothly. |
|
|
Aug 28 2015, 11:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
Sorry for confussion, they were previously elected to MC in previous AGM 201x, then middle of tenure and EGM is held to suspend them. the latest AGM 06/2015, they nominated themselved in MC, while another 5 were elected from the floor to filled in the 7 people MC. i believe it is submitted to COB for the mom.
QUOTE(cherroy @ Aug 28 2015, 10:57 AM) MA can be sacked if not obeying MC instruction. One thing must be clear, are the new MC is appointed properly in the EGM? Because I see from the statement of the bolded part has some contradiction. The importance is how the new MC being elected and whether it is done in proper way and recognised by the COB. Every meeting minutes must be recorded properly and send to COB. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 28 2015, 02:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
aurora, noted and thank you so much for the advise. now onwards we put everything in writing.
|
|
|
Aug 28 2015, 03:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
cherroy, i believe this is overlook by the floor. previous there are nine CM in the previous term, then last term was reduce to 7. and this agm has the worse turnout, usually agm will be postponed 1 weeks, now new law is diffrent.
the first error - happen was happen to be the other 7 committee want to terminate them, but the floor opined that just suspend them till end term is enough. second error - no comment, will note this for next agm third error - i wasnt in the meeting, and it was attended by 5 person only + MA, the 3 MC are new members, and the guy just volunteered to be chairman, the lady volunteered to be treasurer but was rejected by the new MC instead, putting another member due to cheque need to be signed by treasurer and chairman. honestly i did not want to involved in this or embroiled in this Saga, i bought the apt since 2008, this is the first time been an MC member in this apt. QUOTE(cherroy @ Aug 28 2015, 01:51 PM) No offence. It is a mess caused by your side. First error, You don't "suspend" them, but should thrown out them entirely, and elect a new committee member. Second error, Why your side let them being nominated? Just reject the nomination by the floor, by then they cannot be elected into the committee. You don't have to fill committee position entirely, committee member minimum can be as low as 3 person. If there are only 5 nomination, then just fill the 5 position, and can let 2 vacant. If agree to have 7 committee member by the floor (the number can be changed as long as agreed by the floor) Third error, Also, even if they being nominated into committee, why let them become chairman again? If they have wrong doing previously, just reject their nomination by the floor through majority vote, and form a new team, by then the MA has no choice but listen to your new MC instruction. |
|
|
Aug 28 2015, 05:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
a. as mention the current chairman and thesurer are just normal MC members in the previous term, the egm just voted to suspend/bar them from meeting. b. previous mc did a considerable management work that did not raise suspicion, except we are having parking issue and some other issues. c. last agm, previous term comittee just decided not to be re-elected, and rejected the floor to re-nominate them, except fot the two suspended one d. only this year the sudden/steep on dip of funds due to upgrading works and refurbishing works. early year was 650 and now less than 220k (we are elected in June) e. we dont realy query the previous MC as they are able to answer all issue in previous few year of agm, and they are able to maintain the service charges since 2008. as long as they are doing well and attend to my complains, i dont really see a problems. most egm/agm i would attend if times permit. i do care about my investments honestly » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
|
|
|
Nov 5 2015, 04:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
Dear All, can we paste the accounts at the notice board of the management office for entire units for transparency purposes.
like table below : Unit No Maintaince Water Assesment Insurance Interest Total A1-G1-1 A1-G1-2 |
|
|
Nov 6 2015, 10:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
|
|
|
Nov 7 2015, 08:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
ic, i just visited a condo, they post all units. and also they post they monthly financial standing. just want some insight if it ok to do. then we will force the ma to proceed.
QUOTE(ycs @ Nov 7 2015, 07:45 AM) |
|
|
Nov 7 2015, 04:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
great, i would want my MA to do post at notice board the monthly account and status for all units at the notice board.
QUOTE(cherroy @ Nov 7 2015, 04:23 PM) I have seen many condo paste their monthly account on the noticeboard. There is nothing to hide actually, if being run properly. Pasting the monthly account is good for transparency as well as let all the owners knows the financial state of the JMB/MC, to avoid whenever there is deficit time, people accused something. While if needed to raise maintenance fee time to cover the deficit, it is easier to tell all the owner. Last time there was a condo pasted the defaulter list, but some complained the list embarrass them, so the MC came out a better way, put a chart with every unit with months box, once the unit paid, the box being highlighted in yellow, indicated status paid. So those unit without yellow colour one, automatically everyone knew the unit defaulted since when. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2015, 10:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
Aurora, recently our tresurer try to get againg account. i am sure we minuted in meeting last few month to request for the accounts. last week there are heated quarrel between MC and MA (management agent) as the MA did not want to furnish the accounts when we were at the office. and the chairman since to backup the MA again.
|
|
|
Nov 9 2015, 11:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
ic, do the momntly mom need to be endorsed by cob or hba? . last month meeting was postpone. wil try to change the minute taker.
QUOTE(aurora97 @ Nov 9 2015, 11:36 AM) If its minuted and confirmed in the subsequent minutes of meeting, I don't see why the Management Agent (including the Chairman) should hinder the committees request. In the next committee meeting, to request the Chairman and Management Agent to provide a reason as to why they refuse to provide the requested information. If the reason given is not satisfactory, move to terminate the Management Agent, suspend the Chairman and make a report to the authorities both police and COB. You need only a simple majority to move an agenda. In the interim, quickly identify a prospective Managing Agent and accounting firm to ensure continuity and handover of work. |
|
|
Nov 9 2015, 12:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
Thanks aurora, sorry it was typo without proof reading. wanted to write Monthly MOM (minute of meeting)
its good learning curve for us as first time been an mc member, QUOTE(aurora97 @ Nov 9 2015, 12:35 PM) What's the words highlighted in bold? I don't know about HBA but accounts and minutes need to be submitted to COB. COB does nothing. In other words, they collect report for the sake of doing it and they lack provision that allow them to take punitive action against naughty JMB/MCs. Interesting to note, last month meeting canceled, in any case:- Schedule 2 saz the following:- » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
| Change to: | 0.0198sec
0.30
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 05:22 PM |