Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Aircon Discussion V3, Home Appliance

views
     
Richard
post May 3 2016, 10:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(supersound @ May 3 2016, 12:17 PM)
If still confuse, check out Panasonic's website and see their detail spec. Then you will understand.
A ceiling fan only consume <100W while inverter air cond running on lowest output still 2**W, that's with all the power saving features turned on which you may not like it sometimes. By turning off some of such features, it won't consume minimum as it stated.
Inverter only shine when it running on ramp down state, else it will consume more power.
*
Seriously, you are the most confused person.. your post holds no technical merit with zero basis..

Wtf is "ramp down state" ?? Something you made up?
Richard
post May 3 2016, 11:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(keyser soze @ May 3 2016, 11:02 PM)
Inverter is still better than non-inverter in term of efficiency (full /part load) and comfort. The drawback of inverter is the repair cost and the first cost. If you need to choose between 1hp inverter and non-inverter, my suggestion is always go for inverter, since price difference between both is not much. (around RM200)
The energy saving for inverter at full load is still better than non-inverter but the difference is unable to justify for the higher first cost. Means, if you know your AC is going to under size and you expect it run for full load most of the time, also you are not going to use it so often, then go for non-inverter. Especially the price of 2hp inverter is going to be much more expensive (around RM650-700) due to lower demand.
Of course, you can go for inverter to save our earth from global warming or get ready for higher TNB tariff.

There are no way to size one AC to be perfectly accurate in real life, if you under size your AC, then it will always run at full load and unable to cool down the room to your desirable temperature. If you over size your AC then non-inverter AC will keep on start and stop which consume more electricity. Inverter AC will help if you over size the AC, it will tune down it cooling capacity to suit different situation.
*
you're right ..

Cost wise its the DOL (direct online starter) with its start and run capacitors and various contactors and on/off nature of electrical motors that consume the highest amps (6 to 10 times of run amps)..

The inverter circuit board (which is the only difference and what you're paying extra) can modulate the voltage and frequency to vary the motor speed (i.e. variable speed) so you don't get that heavy current draw of the DOL..
Richard
post May 4 2016, 12:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(eddyann @ May 4 2016, 11:33 AM)
newer A/C nowadays has a low starting amp and most if not all for 1-2 HP A/C don't have or need the switch contactor. I use my clamp meter with Max hold function for 1.0 HP the highest amp recorded was 3.5-3.7 Amp, starting amp was about 2.0 Amp and slowly increase to the the max 3.7 Amp. I use the 10A light switch to fully ON/OFF my A/C which is more than enough to cater the 1.0-1.5 HP A/C
*
First a technical reply that makes sense..

ok.. your AC clamp meter measures RMS AC current which isn't the proper way to measure inrush current i.e. ac motor starting amps..

Please watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rM2EtkXCbE its a youtube video by mjlorton..

I've watched it and do not pretend to understand his whole technical explanation but the gist of it is an ac motor inrush current* cannot be measured with a hall effect type clamp meter (the basic clamp meter we all know and love) which can only measure AC RMS amps

rather you need to have an oscilloscope to capture/record/playback the dc and ac inrush current form as basically he says this is where the 6x to 10x inrush current is present.. It's almost an instantaneous current spike at the peak of your ac sinosoidal voltage .. mmm.. maybe getting too technical here ..

basically he captures the inrush at above 22amps with 4amps being the run current..

but anyway have a look at the video and see if you can agree..

As a side note the EER of an inverter type motor will always be higher than a typical DOL start/stop as the input power gets lost as heat during the start/stop stage..

An inverter circuit bypasses this with its ability to control the frequency/voltage i.e. starting motor starting torque thus variable speed drive of the motor..

On any motor controlled via a thermocouple sensor (like your ac unit) having an inverter circuit is a no brainer as it pays for itself very quickly as we live in a hot humid country..

edit* typed motor when it should be current

This post has been edited by Richard: May 4 2016, 05:55 PM
Richard
post May 4 2016, 01:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(cherroy @ May 4 2016, 12:49 PM)
The risk of reliability part of inverter is on the inverter board (that convert AC to DC and control mechanism), which if spoilt can be quite costly.
*
ok.. here's the thing with electrical/electronics reliability its heat that destroy the components(shortens its life)..

An inverter circuit cuts down your current draw meaning reduced heat losses, smaller cable..

Discrete electronic component are to control voltage/frequency/current and the 90% main failure is poor installation and low quality source material.. The other being poor design and where Made in China gets a bad name..

But seems like they improving due to to the copy/produce from brand name manufacturers.. which is a good thing as we all can buy German design Made in china goods.. lol


Richard
post May 4 2016, 01:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(cherroy @ May 4 2016, 01:08 PM)
The major risk is potential harsh environment of the compressor like rain, heat as the circuit board is placed with the compressor side.
So placement of compressor can be a key factor as well as the quality of the board itself.

Inverter /= cut down current draw.
Inverter draws the same or full current when full blast time (which is identical to non-inverter), it is the ability to be under partial load afterwards, that cut down the current draw, which is the major different between inverter and non-inverter.
*
it's more the start/stop nature of the air con motor that differentiate an inverter unit cost savings to non-inverter..

An inverter only functions for starting a electrical motor with lower amps, lower torque and lower losses.. once on full load it has no relevance.. its out of the picture..

but for an aircon unit controlled via thermocouple (temperature sensor) an analogue device, that's where your inverter units gets back saving money matching power input to the load..

a conventional motor will stop/start .. there's no inbetween.. wasting heat during starts every single time..
Richard
post May 4 2016, 01:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(supersound @ May 4 2016, 01:46 PM)
1st time in my life heard of air cond motor, another troller that know 0 basic but try to troll and baseless personal attacks doh.gif
Also, if running on low load and full load has no relevance, then why the power consumption they are putting a range for it? Again, by your statement, it still proves you know nuts on how an air cond works.
And just to slap your self with your limited knowledge, for the same HP air cond, inverter are drawing 3.6A while non inverter drawing 3.7A, but I do understand what you are trying to say 0.1A are still lower doh.gif
And I do like to know what does wasting heat means? Did you actually did temperature measurement and compare? But looking at the way you reply, you never but jus simply spit out doh.gif
*
wow.. sorry to offend you.. you're 100% correct..
Richard
post May 4 2016, 05:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(cherroy @ May 4 2016, 01:55 PM)
I don't know how the newer inverter being designed nowadays, but inverter means AC to DC conversion.

Hence the inverter compressor is a DC motor , even with the full load, the inverter still need to function by converting the incoming supply of AC to DC, so that the motor can run.

We can't by pass the inverter (aka leave the inverter out of picture), and take in incoming AC current to run the motor.
*
bro.. There is no newer inverter design.. i only repeat what i know

Read this maybe a better explanation than me.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_conditioner_inverter

motors can be ac or dc ..

Read this maybe better for you..http://www.ohioelectricmotors.com/2015/07/what-is-the-difference-between-an-ac-motor-and-a-dc-motor/

What i mean "by pass the inverter (aka leave the inverter out of picture), and take in incoming AC current to run the motor" is just that take an inverter aircon you take the 240V 50Hz AC voltage direct to the AC motors contacts..

What you will get is a non-inverter air conditioner.. And I'm refering to both the electrical fan motor and the electrical Compressor motor.. I realise I'm explaining basic electrical systems to non technical people so I'd leave out most of the details as you need a solid electrical background to continue this discussion..

Anyway understand what you will its just that Inverters whether AC via variable frequency or DC via PWM (pulse width modulation) both improve efficiency which is otherwise loss as heat..

It holds true for electrical motors or also LED lamp drivers.. (i.e go for a PWM driver rather than a linear voltage regulator driver)
Richard
post May 4 2016, 08:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(swgiant @ May 4 2016, 07:57 PM)
why inverter aircond failure rate is higher than inverter refrigerator, especially inverter aircond's pcb ?
*
Is this you expressing a personal opinion or quoting an actual data reference ?
Richard
post May 4 2016, 09:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(swgiant @ May 4 2016, 08:42 PM)
By reading 2 threads, aircond and refrigerator. Former mostly board failed, latter mostly compressor failed but still less issue than aircond + personal experience.
*
ok.. inverter vs non-inverter is inverter has extra circuitry, most are dry components but capacitors are basically wet,

Electrolytic capacitors (the main contributors to failed circuit boards) are sensitive to heat and moisture.. over time they dry up and starts acting crazy usually killing a transistor or at least contributing to oxidizing his next door neighbour

dust and moisture build up on a circuit board then you get stray voltages.. this small lightning strikes from surface stray voltages around that part of the board.. again hurting his teen aged neighbours

but all in all you just need to replace them ..

if you know how.. hehe..
Richard
post May 5 2016, 01:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(supersound @ May 4 2016, 10:26 PM)
Well, I also having hard time to find how the test being done. But by taking the numbers on the label, back calculating is ~4 units used a day. The question is, are we really getting 4 units only by following our setting?
Most of the time the test temperature would be 23-26°C.
Just check out on Panasonic's website, they only publish outdoor temperature and not the room temperature. I feel this is quite misleading.
*
What is the confusion?
Richard
post May 6 2016, 07:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(i_bony @ May 6 2016, 01:55 AM)
Hi all masters.

I'm new here. After reading back pages back. Most of the recommendations are Daikin and Panasonic? I am considering to buy one.

How about Mitsubishi Heavy Industries SRK10YL-S? I saw it was selling at RM1999 for 1.0hp with installation

Another model I surveyed was the Sharp Jtech Inverter
Sharp 1.0HP Inverter PCI Air Con [AHXP-10SHV1] this one around RM1700 with installation .

Another one is Beko BKO-BMLX090 Inverter. Which rated at 775 KwH. Half of Panasonic Inverter series.  What I read from their Facebook page was poor after sales service ? Is it reliable in the long run if anyone knows? The sales person claimed that it is reliable in the Europe. This one is RM1620 with installation.

Any comments from sifus for the above mentioned? Which one is more reliable? Or should i just go for Daikin or Panasonic ? Thank you in advance! biggrin.gif
*
If you are looking at initial selling price, consider this ..

Based on their Energy Star rating, for the same 9000 btu/hr cooling load, a non-inverter unit uses 1000kWh units more annually than an inverter unit. Cost wise thats (at rm0.50/kwh DM1 tariff charged by my SESB) thats rm500 more a year..

Putting it another way you save rm500 a year using inverter, that should give you enough reason..

In terms of reliability, Panasonic has a long history(more than 50 years) of good consumer products be it Air conditioners, refrigerators or ceiling fans.. They're also known as National Panasonic which is reputable and known reliable brand in Malaysia.
Richard
post May 6 2016, 01:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(supersound @ May 6 2016, 10:59 AM)
Nope, you are wrong, already have a member posted but the bill still high.
So is not like you said. Good try on your personal attack, but you failed puke.gif
Not to mention, already came out in the news that inverter does not really save electricity bills.
*
This guy definitely talking out of his ass.. Every single thing he types is totally unfounded or basically technically wrong..

A real danger to those of us looking for factual data to better understand our local market availability and save some money..

All of his post shows a person with no technical foundation, lacks the ability to understand and accept published online data by reputable authorities and a real danger in the way he vomits out nonsense as if its the gospel truth.

Please look up the Wikipedia definition of "Idiot" and compare it to his post.. "Supersound" = this definition..


Richard
post May 6 2016, 02:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(keyser soze @ May 6 2016, 01:53 PM)
rclxms.gif That's why I always think his post is danger to other forumer who try to look for info. Those who didn't read his previous nonsense post might thing he is right and choose to trust him.
*
Seriously..

I quote his past post..

QUOTE(supersound @ May 6 2016, 09:34 AM)
If were to talk about EC's accuracy on power consumption, non inverter that falls on 2-3 stars are more accurate than inverter's 5 stars.
If your usage are < 6 hours, just get non inverter, else get inverter. Prolong period of usage only justify the initial cost of inverter. If the savings only 1kwh a day which translates to rm0.5(depending on which tariff bracket you are in), 1 year you only save rm182.5. But for same HP, inverter are rm200 more expensive than non inverter, not to mention the service cost also double.


Talking about EC .. Energy Commission (Malaysia)

This is wikipedia's article for our EC..

The Energy Commission (Malay: Suruhanjaya Tenaga), abbreviated ST, was created under the Energy Commission Act 2001 as a new regulator for the energy industry in Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah. The Commission was established to ensure that the energy industry is developed in an efficient manner so that Malaysia is ready to meet the new challenges of globalisation and liberalisation, particularly in the energy supply industry.

The Energy star Label for 5 stars..
Guideline on Energy Efficiency Labelling for Electrical Appliances
Based on Electricity Regulation 1994 (Amendments 2013) Regulation 101A (3)
"Any equipment that meets all the requirements of efficient use of electricity under subregulation (1) shall be affixed with an efficiency rating label in such form and manner as may be determined by the Commission."

The lab which does all this test is SIRIM.. SIRIM answers to EC and this guy is talking about EC's accuracy??!!!

Can't even string sentences for a proper answer or sequence a logical line of thought and still talk shit..

WTF ?? !! Really nonsense...

This post has been edited by Richard: May 6 2016, 04:14 PM
Richard
post May 9 2016, 08:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(ozak @ May 9 2016, 12:30 AM)
My best prove is the tnb bill. And I already run the inverter for 8yrs.

The amount of saving in 8yrs compare previous non inverter is enough for me to get a new aircon.

And I laughing at people who still arguing till now.
*
well said..

As pointed out per Energy Star label eg. Panasonic 1hp inverter (vs non-inverter) saves 1000 kwH a year (at 8 hrs/day, 365 days/yr), at RM0.45/kwH (>300kWh for SESB tariff DM1) that works out to RM450 savings annually.

Even if you don't use the same number of hours my opinion you will get back the cost difference within 3 yrs and then start savings from then on.. its a no brainer..
Richard
post May 9 2016, 08:44 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(KageBunshi @ May 7 2016, 08:45 PM)
Guy. Is the any problem if i install 1hp aircon on a copper piping for 2hp? Will it function as normal?
*
Depends on length of the copper pipe.. More refrigerant means basically higher cooling capacity which might overload the 1hp compressor..

If you experience compressor thermal overload this might be one reason..
Richard
post May 9 2016, 09:16 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(ozak @ May 9 2016, 09:02 AM)
I use 8hr everyday.

Use more or less is just save more or less. Longer or shorter payback. It is still saving.

Most of the people cannot understand the saving is because

1)they don't have old aircon to compare the bill.
2) the initial cost is difficult to pay. Different a lot compare.
3) not enough budget if you renovate the house.
*
Yes.. I actually given up trying to explain to this forum..

My English very poor.. I have trouble in communication.. i get too technical or too aggressive ..
Sad.. so I keep quiet most times..
Richard
post May 9 2016, 12:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(Cruxs @ May 9 2016, 11:00 AM)
My bedroom size = 17 x 10 x14 feet. 1hp aircond is enough? Most of the time will use it since my room got big glass wall. Only 1 can open for ventilation. Others are fixed glass panel & will get direct sunlight after 2pm to 5pm. Other gadget that generate heat are 24hours running pc. Should i get inverter or non inverter model? Aircond usage more than 12hours a day.
*
Sizing based on rule of thumb (standard 12' high ceiling)= area x 60 btu/hr
Add 20% for large windows or glass walls exposed to sun light.

9000 btu/hr = 1 hp..

Richard
post May 9 2016, 05:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(munlok30 @ May 9 2016, 11:57 AM)
sadly i just know the brand but not the model  bangwall.gif  bangwall.gif

my room is not really big and i am install 1.0 HP air cond ..

it is a new air cond , but the cooling process really really slow @>@
*
What's your room size, ceiling height, number of people in the room and heat sources into the room?

A correctly sized and located air conditioner will cool the space within 10 mins..
Richard
post May 9 2016, 06:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(KageBunshi @ May 9 2016, 05:41 PM)
Means compressor is taking more current to cool down all the extra gas in the bigger piping?

*
Means the compressor is now under sized, it has a higher volume of gas to compress making it run hotter than normal..

QUOTE(KageBunshi @ May 9 2016, 05:41 PM)
In that case short pipe is ok?
Mine piping is short, around 6-8 feet
*
Yes.. keep the copper piping as short as possible..
Richard
post May 9 2016, 06:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(munlok30 @ May 9 2016, 06:19 PM)
Room size is just a normal size. .

Number of people just me .. Only one ..

And I think is not all about how power is my air cond .

The location of the air cond is really bad ..

The stupid air condi man is really dumb as he install the air conditioning on the side without telling me @.@ .. When I back home I was really surprise .. No wonder my room never get cool ..

How much did you think I need to pay to re-install the air conditioning and plug at center ?
*
If you're in kota Kinabalu relocation Non Inverter 1HP is rm180-rm200, Inverter is rm220-rm250..

They might just relocate the blower unit only unless you clearly instruct them what you want..

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2737sec    0.58    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 07:24 AM