Does Malaysia’s military need a Mistral-class ship?
tiger-talk-2zOnce again, rumours abound of yet another purchase by the government that aims to augment Malaysia’s defensive capabilities, funded by taxpayers. Right now, the question remains: Does Malaysia need an amphibious assault ship?
For clarity’s sake, Tiger is going to start off with this: the Mistral-class is not an aircraft carrier, at least, not in the traditional sense of the term; it is actually an amphibious assault ship. The Mistral has the ability to serve as a mobile base of operations for helicopters, rather than being one of those great ships with two or four catapults that launch fighter jets and cost a bomb or two to maintain.
And no, the Mistral has no way of launching the Rafale fighter jet. Yes, the Rafale has a variant that is meant for operating from an aircraft carrier, but the Mistral class is unable to support fixed-wing aircraft.
All right, now that Tiger is done being a military geek, Tiger will reiterate a key point: Why does Malaysia need one of these warships?
Of course, it is all well and good to declare that it is “for the defence of the nation!” and all that, but still, there is also the matter of compatibility, is there not?
As far as Tiger knows, the Mistral does not fulfil any specific role in the Malaysian defence forces. In the short term, the most Tiger can see it being used for is as a mobile helicopter base off the coast of Sabah to deter incursions. However, this is, to Tiger, the equivalent of using a high-calibre rifle to shoot the cheat opposite you at the poker table.
Even looking towards the long term, the funds used to procure, maintain, and train up the people to man the Mistral would be better served by building up a defence presence in Sabah and Sarawak.
Not only would this serve as a deterrent against incursions due to the bases or garrisons, but it would show that the government is concerned with the defence of Malaysia as a whole, rather than having everything concentrated in Peninsular Malaysia.
Mistral calss helicopter carrier in-storyWhether or not the funds are enough, well, let’s just put it this way. The procurement cost of the ship was estimated by Pandan member of parliament Rafizi Ramli as RM3 billion. Note that this is just the procurement cost – which is only the cost of buying the vessel – and does not take into account the costs to equip, maintain, and train people to be able to operate the vessel.
Furthermore, it should be noted that it is not possible to just dump helicopters already available on the warship, and expect them to function. Operating from a carrier is very different from operating out of an airfield, with the carrier bringing its own environmental issues that have to be guarded against.
First and foremost in this scenario is the issue of salt water. Salt water is corrosive, and the helicopters assigned to the carrier will have to be able to function properly and reliably over time in an environment where the air is highly humid and exposed to sea spray.
Next, is that these helicopters would then have a quicker “expiry date”, so to speak. While there are definitely steps that can be taken to harden the helicopters against the harsher environment of a carrier, there is only so much that can be done, and the helicopters will eventually succumb to corrosion.
As such, these helicopters would then have to be replaced. Of course, this means further expenditure, either by obtaining helicopters and refitting them for naval aviation purposes, or right out purchasing helicopters meant for naval aviation. And what about the cost of procurement, equipment, and maintenance of the helicopters, as well as the training for pilots?
The cost over time of the amphibious assault ship just seems to keep mounting, does it not? And what would the ship actually contribute in the long term on its own?
Note that the key phrase there is “on its own”. The ship on its own, without the requisite support elements, infantry, and hardware to use it with, would stand useless.
Tiger hopes that the government will look into overall costs and benefits thoroughly when making its choice for defence procurements, rather than acting like a child walking into a toy store. There really is no point having a big fancy ship if there is no money to maintain it, no people who know how to use it, and nothing to use it with.
GRRRRR!!!
http://www.kinibiz.com/story/tigertalk/187...class-ship.htmlThis post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Sep 5 2015, 08:16 PM