Mind to share what's misleading?

interesting,.....
yr posting,..."They show return(%) by using the lowest & highest NAV of the year instead of the distribution(%)."
I may have missed seeing it...can you pls provide a screen shot of the word or any indications that the "RETURNS %" are by using the lowest & highest NAV of the year...."

I got this from PM site...
http://www.publicmutual.com.my/LinkClick.a...ug%3d&tabid=248

yr posting...."The distribution is shown but in cents, unlike previously got % as well".
they announces distribution in SEN per unit.
http://www.publicmutual.com.my/LinkClick.a...jQ8%3d&tabid=87

Sometimes and in many cases, it is the wrong expectations or understanding and quick of making assumption that caused misunderstanding then blaming others for what we failed to see. 

you are implying,....
1) UTs investor can gauge how much they earned from the distribution if the distribution is in %?....
2) you are "regular UTs investor"....
3) FHs cannot use Annual returns to gauge the fund performance over a period of time...

I  ,...saving some breath....after all that I said.


sorry, I cannot answer more of your questions, because
1) I don't gauge how much I will earned from the UTs distribution, be it if the distribution is in % or in SEN...as a matter of facts I don't bother with UTs distribution...b'cos it makes NO different to my investment value.
2) I am not a regular investor......therefore what can I tell you as u are a "regular UTs investor".
3) I NOT only use annual returns to gauge the fund performance over a period of time....but I also use peer to peer annual return and annualized returns comparison of it performance and its RR ratio too....

bro - on the distribution (it's called distribution, NOT dividend, for a reason), it doesn't matter

T231H is stating the obvious and this mis-assumption on UT distribution is common - it is literally of  no impact other than diluting units. Total total - one will still hold the have value on the VERY INSTANCE before and after

eg.
1:00pm NAV $1 / unit before distribution, held 1000 units,
value held = $1*1000 units = $1,000
VS
1:01pm $0.10 distribution per unit, thus i get $100 and reinvested at NAV $0.90, that's 111.111111111 (infini)
NAV become $0.90,
now i'm holding $0.90 *(1000 ori +111.11111infini) = $1,000 value STILL HELD

pardon my rounding/infi 1s

Of course if U insist that people should invest with the focus on distribution (no, there is no dividends per say given by UTs), then no harm/foul - that's your reality  Those who know the maths/logic will just silently smile