QUOTE(j.passing.by @ Oct 11 2015, 04:40 PM)
Further comments:
The total growths in the above post looks fastastic; with at least 50% more than EPF's 74.3%. But when annualised, the figures look normal and within the expected rate of any UT and investments which comes with added risk.
10-yr total growth, and annualised rates:
130.60% 8.71%
144.37% 9.35%
185.04% 11.04%
144.81% 9.37%
144.47% 9.35%
179.35% 10.82%
180.33% 10.86%
The extra 3-5% each year makes the big difference in the long term.
Thank you sharing. The total growths in the above post looks fastastic; with at least 50% more than EPF's 74.3%. But when annualised, the figures look normal and within the expected rate of any UT and investments which comes with added risk.
10-yr total growth, and annualised rates:
130.60% 8.71%
144.37% 9.35%
185.04% 11.04%
144.81% 9.37%
144.47% 9.35%
179.35% 10.82%
180.33% 10.86%
The extra 3-5% each year makes the big difference in the long term.
I'm not frequently visiting here .....
I heard from others that Public Mutual is living in previous glory and that's the reason the total return is good ... however the last 3 years returns are not there ...
Can sifu sifu comment on this? Is this short term issue? or overall public mutual fund managers are not performing over last 3 to 5 years. Appreciate for your comments / sharing. TQ.
Oct 11 2015, 10:05 PM

Quote
0.0867sec
0.25
7 queries
GZIP Disabled