QUOTE(dasecret @ Jan 3 2017, 01:07 AM)
I agree that agents exist to serve a market that need their service. But at the same time, I feel that most agents in Msia is below par. Particularly for PM, all they seem to do is to get a list of fund of the month (EQ or balanced funds only) from their upline to promote to their clients. Or when the market is heading south, advise to switch to bond or MMF as temporary measure. What about assessing client's risk appetite, even when market is going up, is 100% EQ funds suitable for most retail investors? What about asset allocation strategy?
Investors with PM are not stupid, a lot of them made good returns in the earlier years. The question is, do they pay attention to the latest developments and choices out there in the market or just trust their agent whole heartedly?
What I attempt to do here is, provide an avenue for people who are clearly not happy with their returns to see for themselves how does public mutual funds fare compared to other competing funds. If they bother to google i supposed
Simple biz thought - all else being equal (ie. gross profits), the winners are the ones with lower costs.Investors with PM are not stupid, a lot of them made good returns in the earlier years. The question is, do they pay attention to the latest developments and choices out there in the market or just trust their agent whole heartedly?
What I attempt to do here is, provide an avenue for people who are clearly not happy with their returns to see for themselves how does public mutual funds fare compared to other competing funds. If they bother to google i supposed
Unfortunately some prefer to "seek alpha" by paying that EXTRA cost for the "brand name" & hoping for alpha.
Is good, is good - else less competition in the fund managers' arena
Jan 3 2017, 08:19 AM
Quote
0.0909sec
0.55
7 queries
GZIP Disabled