The Oil & Gas industry’s next crisis is not about oil price
Oct 1, Tobias Read
According to a general consensus, 200,000 professional grade jobs have been lost from the upstream industry in the last twelve months. With new capital expenditure as rare as hens’ teeth, 2016 is shaping up to be another tough year.
My expectation is that the overall number of losses will go over 250,000: Obviously, this is not an encouraging statistic. There is also a longer term impact to consider, alongside the awful cost to individuals and families whose very real struggles make up the top line statistics. The headline figure only charts job losses; it does not take into account jobs that are not being created. Budding graduate engineers who are not being hired will have a real, long-term impact on the industry’s talent pool – a point I credit to Bill Thomas of the SWCC. This deficit in new entrants to the talent pool will continue to mount until there is a clear recovery and mothballed graduate schemes are restarted. That may be two to four years out.
Those that have exited the industry in the mid to later stages of their career are good people, often some of the most qualified. Those lucky enough to be at the right age for retirement, probably have retired. Those with mortgages and car payments are the most battered and bruised by all this and many have had to find options outside the sector.
So what of the great crew change? This was the name given to the impending retirement of large numbers of oil & gas professionals. According to a recent article in the Oil & Gas Financial Journal, 71% are over the age of 50, and they will have prospered during the boom years. Their departure would create a skill shortage that would pose real problems if the recruitment and development of young engineers couldn’t keep pace. This used to preoccupy everybody in the business. Right now, you don’t hear much talk of it. Not surprising really. Who wants to talk about skill shortages when major employers are trying to decide which 20% of their businesses to lay-off? People are retiring? OK. That alleviates some pressure.
You’ll have spotted the problem here. It concerns me greatly, and frankly it should concern every CEO of every oil related business:
Losing significant numbers from the older end of the workforce, while not bringing in anyone at the younger end will have two main impacts. Firstly, you’ll see a reduction in the pressure to downsize your workforce. You don’t have to lay off people who are retiring, or who were never hired. So that’s comforting. Secondly, you’ll create a massive skill gap in the future workforce.
I know that everybody is preparing themselves for longer term low oil prices and recruitment and rebuilding the talent pool is not on anyone’s list of priorities. This is woefully shortsighted. I’m reminded of the story of the man who fell off the roof of a skyscraper. As he looked at his reflection in the glass on the way down he said to himself. ‘Well, so far so good.’ The moral of the story. It’s not how you fall, it’s how you land.
This industry will land. In the upstream sector we are in for an extended period of at least three years of under-investment following the recent six years of over-investment and, before we know it, global demand will accelerate, reserves will deplete and productive assets will atrophy.
At that point, and I’m thinking now of 2018, the market will rebound, slowly at first but then with a vengeance. At that point the industry is going to kick in again only to find that it has lost much of the talent required to deliver projects. The war for talent will return, contractor rates will rapidly increase regaining recent lost ground and achieving new highs. This may tempt retirees back from their beach retreats and a return to the oil patch for those not too battered by the experience of being forcibly removed during the current cost cutting.
While the great crew change was much talked about until last year, it never really bit. Yes wages and day-rates accelerated but never to critical levels. Next time it will bite hard. There is no magic wand and there is nothing we can do about it. This is a market of supply and demand. We can’t force oil companies to invest in graduate schemes or to retain non-critical staff when the market is down. If you are an employee there may be good news ahead; job security for another cycle beacons.
If you are an employer then your situation will be more difficult. This will be the actual ‘great crew change’. Talent will be in short supply, supply chain costs will increase, raising break-even and lowering profits. Future talent will come from wider afield.
Where once the US and the UK exported ex-pats, those destinations will now become key sources of talent, subject as always to visa restrictions. Other than that there are not many answers.
As an employer, look to your behavior now while the tide is out. People have long memories. If you have to fire people, fire people nicely and leave the door open for them to return when you need them. Maintain your contacts in staffing and work closely with key suppliers to secure access to future talent. If you don’t, then you will be forced to simply revert to fundamentals and pay more than the next company.
It may not feel like it now, but 2018 is not far away. New years bring new problems and in our industry, the pace of change is rapid. The days when we worried about $145 oil may seem a long way behind us, but I assure you they are right behind us. Just as the next burgeoning crisis is right in front of us.
______________
Tobias Read is the CEO of Swift Worldwide Resources, a world leader in Oil & Gas staffing with thousands of employees across the global industry.Source