QUOTE(blancpain4470 @ Nov 9 2019, 01:27 PM)
It is a clever solution to no neutral solution to power the smart switch circuitry. But now I think I won't buy those without N smart switches. Too much trouble and reliability risk. It is far easier just to add an N and re-route my connections in ELCB/DB box.
It is not something hard to do but when it first came out, Westerners were trying hard to figure out where the power came from and they even have discussion in their forums with several proposals by "engineers". The houses in the US have N at each switch but since we follow the UK style, there is no N. So, that is why people design this circuit. I do not see any reliability or risk in this approach. It is a fantastic idea for existing house where you not require any modification or do costly rewiring. It is just plug and play in most cases.
However, there is limitation to this approach. Since the current is split into 2 paths, the maximum power to the load is limited to a bit bit lower than the circuit with N can provide. However, most can drive up to 3kW I think. So, it is not a problem for any lighting circuit. Furthermore, the wiring to high power requirement load like water heater comes with N at the switch.
I've been using smart switch for quite some time and I do not even have to put any by-bass capacitor to any light point so far even with CFL or LED lighting. Never experience any flicker at all. My touch switch is even from China cap ayam brand
Nov 9 2019, 04:59 PM

Quote

0.3343sec
0.55
7 queries
GZIP Disabled