Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
What to do in an accident in Malaysia, Everything about m/vehicle insurance
|
Valkyrie0227
|
Jan 31 2017, 06:53 PM
|
New Member
|
If an accident happened between a car and a motorcycle. The car driver went to make a police report and obtained the receipt of the report. The police convinced the driver that it is the driver's fault. But the police did not charge the driver RM300, what does it means? According the comments here, seems like police will charge RM300. Anyone knows why? The police report did not state which party is at fault as well.
This post has been edited by Valkyrie0227: Jan 31 2017, 06:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valkyrie0227
|
Feb 1 2017, 10:56 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(loui @ Feb 1 2017, 08:41 PM) Theoretically police have to compound who ever at fault But malaysia police sometimes work out of theory If you need police compound to succeed in your claim, and you have strong evidence to prove your claim, such as video or witness you need to constantly harass the police in charge If still not work, submit your complaint to bukit aman on the said police The whole process is tedious and bukit aman is very pro police Your complain will most likely go no where I understand that the police will have to state who is at fault but in the paper i received, it did not state who is at fault. The motorcyclist did not make a police report according to the police.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valkyrie0227
|
Feb 2 2017, 05:32 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(loui @ Feb 2 2017, 12:37 AM) Not necessary There are three type of investigation outcome You at fault The other at fault Or no one at fault Again, theoretically the party who fail to lodge police report by default surrender But too bad Malaysia police work out of common sense in some occasion The best way is to sit face to face with the police in charge and demand explaination on his investigation outcome Did the motorcyclist injured? Sometimes police refuse to compound the injured parties so that they can sell the case to lawyer with better price Minor injury. Its been more than 2 months already. The police in charge did mention it was my fault. But the explanation given by the police is somehow not logical. For example, explained to the officer that the rider violently knocked on car window with his helmet when car was about to enter roundabout. The officer asked which exit do the car intend to exit. Replied the intended exit to the officer and the officer said the rider knocked on the window because car entered wrong lane into the roundabout. Weird thing is, how would the rider know which exit the car is going to use? Either lane could be right. The car WAS about to entered roundabout not exiting. Clearly the rider motive is intentional but the reason given by the officer sounds like they just want to conclude the case quickly.
|
|
|
|
|