QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ May 7 2015, 01:19 PM)
SA will not have such info and probably clueless else can ask Jim.Tan share info.
You can try pressure SC though. But they may not have the price list as well cuz still new and nobody replace anything yet.

Either one will do.
QUOTE(Johnlee0101 @ May 7 2015, 01:52 PM)
How would this car compared to a POLO 1.2 TSI? (In term of power, handling and comfort)
Anyone have a rough idea?
VW Polo 1.2 TSI cost more than Mazda 2 price tag, hence, cannot be directly compared this way.
Only VW Polo Sedan or Polo 1.6 MPI can be compared directly.
1.2 TSI engines are twin-charged engine, will produce a lot of torque for pickup because it is super+turbocharged, and pairing that to 7spd DSG transmission, you get superb acceleration feeling, like a sports car. Drawback is it is not suited for our hot climate and traffic jams.
However, looking back at VW's dark history with their 7spd DSG transmission, faulty engine and hidden 2+3 years warranty cover, a lot of potential customers shy away from VW. 2nd hand value of the car dropped 50% in first 2 years after the manufacturer's warranty expires, and from then onwards is warrantied by an insurer, hence, whether to accept repairs cost of the car is up to the insurer's discretion. Clutch pack cost RM4k/change (VW give 50% discount so now RM2k) almost every or every two years. Repair waiting period is phenomenally long, as there are a lot of other cars had the same problem.
VW had a lot of reliability issues.
QUOTE(ssyycc @ May 7 2015, 02:09 PM)
Anyone could estimate mzd parts vs T?H/N price difference? How many percent?
If the current m2 is more popular than the previous one which I am quite confidence it will, and when it's CBU from thailand, may be there is a lot of OEM parts available. So generally we just need to have faith that the maintenance should not be a lot expensive than other japanese car brand.
Being RM90k car and CBU Thailand, I guess it wouldn't cost a lot more than Vios I guess, I believe slightly would be better as Toyota concept of cost cutting is trying to match parts with different car model, hence can increase production quantity, which in turn drive cost down. Mazda 2 1.5L might not have similar parts with 2.0L, even 2.0L and 2.5L visually the same, but size both different. As scaled up model.
QUOTE(pizzy @ May 7 2015, 03:27 PM)
Polo 1.2 TSI is CBU, while Polo 1.6 is CKD
1.6 far more cheaper than 1.2 TSI with problematic DSG dual-clutch gearbox
but now DSG problem has been fixed by replacing the dry single-plate clutch to wet multi-plate clutch...
I think they didn't change it from dry clutch to wet clutch, instead just change to mineral oil based transmission fluid, and have to change the transmission fluid often as mineral based oil don't last long than synthetic oil, like Honda clutch-type CVT gearbox, new SC recommendation change every 30K km.
This post has been edited by RicoT: May 7 2015, 04:40 PM