QUOTE(aaronpang @ Mar 31 2015, 10:05 AM)
Yup never bothered with the megapixels arms race, also automation meant I'm not taking photos. its the camera.
It became very obvious when shooting with manual film camera's half my pictures exposure are off
DSLR camera's strength is their lenses.
Frankly give up on P&S that market is owned by the phone camera's. Obvious look at how standalone MP3 players have all gone extinct.
Indeed. Actually, all we need are the trinity lenses.
1) Ultrawide
2) Standard walkabout
3) Telephoto zoom
However, with Google's Project Ara already going through beta testing, it'll come a time very soon when you can mount lenses on the back of your phone. Heck, you can even swap processors and broken screens easily. You can apply for a Project Ara phone if you're a developer

Read more below
http://www.techgarage.my/introducing-modular-smart-phones/Also, Apple has patents for dual lenses, instead of a standard one. I bet we'll see an ultra wide and a 50mm equivalent on the iPhone.
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 31 2015, 11:46 AM)
Yup.
Yes, mediocre PnS like mediocre MP3 players suffer because of smartphones. But when people want something better than mediocre, then PnS like Sony RX100 MkIII / RX1R or MP3 players like Astell & Kern's Ak240 / Sony NWZ-ZX2 still have their niche.
But coming back on topic, the day that smartphone cameras would match the focusing and capture speed of DSLRs, I'll switch.

But smartphones are getting there already. Nightshots on my Note 4 are damn impressive even for holiday photos not to mention my favourite panoramic function that's just super easy to take wide angle shots.
Ah, it might never, as DSLR makers will keep pushing focusing speed and megapixels. After all, these are what newspapers and pro photogs need. However there's a few problems to consider
1) Media companies like the Star and Utusan, never buy from a shop. Rather, they get their stocks from Nikon/Canon directly and then contra via ads
2) In terms of image quality, the Nokia Lumia 1020 out resolved a high end Nikon full frame in a test two years back. The iPhone 4s improved so much that if you saw the trends, the rise of the 4s saw the drop in camera sales
3) Not everyone needs a DSLR.
The very interesting fact is this. Most of us moved to the DSLR, because we were frustrated with the state of point and shoot cameras, no? with our P&S cameras back then, focusing was bad, flash was always overcompensated and it was hard to take good shots.
Then I found out that Canikon were skimping on sensors for P&S, as they did not have a viable competitors. Thus they can slap el-cheapo sensors on the back on a P&S, better sensors and processors on the high end powershot series and then their best on DSLRs.
And it worked like a charm as they sold 120 million back in 2012 [1]. But with the iPhone pushing the barriers of smart phone photography, suddenly people had a device they could compare to. And it's easy to tell that Canikon was giving us inferior sensors with saying stuff that small sensors can't perform. That becomes untrue when you take into consideration the performance of the iPhone 4s, iPhone 5, iPhone 5s and now the iPhone 6.
The 5s superseded even the Canon 30D, a prosumer DSLR in terms of performance!

What happens the next two years would be interesting
1) Would camera manufacturers change strategy? Would we see Android on DSLRs with 3G?
2) Would they go bankrupt? Nikon's shares dropped from 2500 yen (20 USD) to 1500 yen (12 USD) in the last 2 years
3) Can camera shops adapt? Most of them are reluctant to embrace smart phones, because that's really a cut throat world
[1] -
http://www.cipa.jp/stats/documents/common/cr300.pdf