QUOTE(puchongite @ Mar 29 2015, 10:46 PM)
Developer Foul Play On LAD, LAD
Developer Foul Play On LAD, LAD
|
|
Apr 1 2015, 08:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,230 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
|
|
|
Apr 1 2015, 08:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,230 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(gks @ Apr 1 2015, 10:19 AM) Before you even thinking of going to tribunal, please check and make sure the project is under Schedule H. From your LAD 8% i am quite certain this is another version of SOFO/SOVO that u bought. MCT sold a lot of such projects. Schedule H the LAD is 10% for parcel + another 10% of balance 20% purchase price for the common area deliveries. MCT The Place is SOHO which is under HDA. I hope I'm not wrong.Otherwise you might just waste gas. If that is the case, you can't go to tribunal. It is either you group together with all buyers and bring them to court (after the risk vs reward analysis) or just accept the payment and move on with your life. This post has been edited by 1282009: Apr 1 2015, 08:39 PM |
|
|
Apr 1 2015, 08:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,230 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Mar 26 2015, 10:53 AM) Bro, is the dev willing to pay full 5 mths late charges based on discount price ? I agreed. If it is, then I advise u to take it. Else, legal process delay longer and u have to pay legal charges and the processing period also unable to get the key while paying the full bank installments. Not advantage as a buyer. Btw, I feel its fair if they give LPI based on discounted price since that was the actual purchase price. If it reflected into the S&P, then all purchasers kenot pay 2% and enjoy 8% disc while obtained 90% loan dy. If TS is getting the LAD payment for 5 full months (up to the registered VP letter or there about), it's already good. I got LAD recently from 1 developer who only paid the LAD on the property but not on common facilities claiming that the facilities are already completed on time (but I can't use them because the overall property is not ready yet!). I saved my time arguing because the amount different is <2k. However if MCT only pays TS 50% of his deserved LAD then it's really bad! Such practice should be highlighted & made known to all. This post has been edited by 1282009: Apr 1 2015, 08:48 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0168sec
0.32
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 11:35 PM |